Organic Letters
Letter
H bond activation of isoxazolidin-4-ones,10 although the
substrate scope is limited (Scheme 2, eq b). Therefore, a
new method for synthesizing β-homoproline derivatives is still
in demand and will be useful for scientists in related areas.
Carbonylation is an effective and important strategy for
constructing various compounds with carbonyl functionality;
meanwhile, carbon monoxide as a cheap and approachable
carbonyl source has been widely applied in synthetic
chemistry.11 We have been attracted by CO chemistry as
well and been interested in using CO as a carbonyl source to
synthesize various heterocyclic compounds.11d−f We envisaged
that a low-cost metal-catalyzed carbonylation of N-fluoro-
sulfonamides to give β-homoproline derivatives might be
realized by the intramolecular cyclization and intermolecular
carbonylation of free radicals.
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
b
entry
catalyst
ligand + base
solvent
MeCN
yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OAc)2
CuI
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + LiOH
L1 + K2CO3
L1 + pyridine
L1
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + Li2CO3
L1 + Li2CO3
L2 + Li2CO3
L3 + Li2CO3
L4 + Li2CO3
L5 + Li2CO3
L6 + Li2CO3
Li2CO3
38
32
26
28
trace
35
20
nd
46
44
31
50
42
51
56
52
48
28
71
76
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
THF
Inspired by the previous achievements (Scheme 2, eq c)12
and to achieve our hypothesis, we chose N-fluoro-4-methyl-N-
(pent-4-en-1-yl)benzenesulfonamide 1a as the model substrate
and MeOH as the nucleophile. Combining the recent research
progress of N-fluoro-sulfonamides13 and our previous experi-
ence on cheap metal-catalyzed carbonylation,14 we initiated
our study by using Cu(OTf)2 and bipyridine as the catalytic
system and Li2CO3 as the base under pressure of CO (30 bar)
in MeCN at 80 °C. To our delight, we observed the desired β-
homoproline ester 2a in 38% yield (Table 1, entry 1). After
comparing different copper catalyst effects, Cu(OTf)2 was
found to be the most effective catalyst among these copper
catalyst precursors (Table 1, entries 1−4). Different base
sources were then tested, including LiOH, K2CO3, and
pyridine, and the yield of the desired product was decreased
in those cases (Table 1, entries 5−7). In the case of LiOH, the
decreased yield might be due to the reaction between the
target ester and the hydroxide. In the absence of base, no target
product was detected (Table 1, entry 8). Then, we examined
other various solvents, including THF, PhCF3, and DCE;
however, the starting material 1a could not be better
transformed into 2a (Table 1, entries 9−11). The use of
DMAc or DMF as the solvent also lead to a low yield.
Delightfully, when the reaction was performed in a mixed
solvent of THF/PhCF3 (4:1), a 50% yield of the target product
2a could be obtained (Table 1, entry 12). Afterward, we turned
our attention to explore the ligand effects (Table 1, entries 12−
17). A 42% yield of the desired product can be produced with
1,10-phenanthroline used as the ligand, and the reaction
efficiency can be improved when it is substituted with a methyl
group (Table 1, entries 13 and 14). Improved yields can be
obtained when 2,2′-bipyridine is substituted with an alkyl
group, and a 56% yield was achieved with L4 as the ligand
(Table 1, entries 15 and 16). However, a decreased yield was
obtained when 2,2′-bipyrimidine was applied as the ligand, and
the yield of the desired product was further decreased to 28%
in the absence of ligand (Table 1, entries 17 and 18).
Additionally, we considered adjusting the temperature and the
CO pressure of the reaction as well. Satisfactorily, the yield of
the target product could be improved to 71%, when the CO
pressure was increased to 50 bar (Table 1, entry 19). On the
basis of this reaction condition, the reaction yield could be
improved to 76% when we changed the temperature to 100 °C
(Table 1, entry 20). Subsequently, we continued to increase
the CO pressure to 60 bar, and only a small improvement in
the reaction outcome was observed (Table 1, entry 21).
Finally, we assessed the substrate scope of this reaction with 5
mol % of Cu(OTf)2, 10 mol % of 5,5′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine,
CuF2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
Cu(OTf)2
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PhCF3
DCE
c
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
THF + PhCF3
c
c
c
c
c
cd
,
ce
,
L4 + Li2CO3
L4 + Li2CO3
L4 + Li2CO3
cf
,
cf
,
g
79 (73)
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), MeOH (0.1 mL), catalysts (5
mol %), ligands (10 mol %), and base (1 equiv) in solvent (1 mL) at
80 °C for 20 h under CO (30 bar). Yields were determined by GC-
FID analysis using n-hexadecane as the internal standard. THF/
PhCF3 4:1. 80 °C, CO (50 bar). 100 °C, CO (50 bar). 100 °C, CO
(60 bar). Isolated yield. nd = no detection. THF = tetrahydrofuran.
b
c
d
e
f
g
DCE = 1,2-dichloroethane.
and 1 equiv of Li2CO3 under CO pressure (50 bar) in a mixed
solvent of THF/PhCF3 (4:1) at 100 °C.
With the optimized reaction conditions established (Table 1,
entry 20), we then explored the scope of this reaction with a
range of N-fluoro-sulfonamides and alcohols. As shown in
Scheme 3, the starting materials of 1a−d bearing electron-
donating or -neutral groups were smoothly converted into the
corresponding N-sulfonyl-β-homoproline ester products 2a−d
in good yield. The aromatic ring of N-fluoro-sulfonamides with
no functional group or ortho-chloro substitution can be
prepared as well, and the desires products 2b and 2e were
obtained in 70 and 46% yield, respectively. Notably, different
alkyl alcohols as nucleophiles including ethanol, propanol,
isopropanol, and n-butanol, were reacted with 1a, and the
desired products 2f−i were successfully obtained in moderated
yield (51−57%). Furthermore, the alcohol bearing a terminal
alkenyl or trifluoromethyl group was well-tolerated as well,
forming the desired products 2j−l in 32−41%. We scaled up
the reaction to a 1.0 mmol level under the optimal reaction
conditions. To our delight, the desired product 2a could be
prepared in a 60% isolated yield when the reaction of 1a (1.0
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX