thiacalixarenes in supramolecular chemistry is limited by the
absence of general derivatization methods that are otherwise
well established for classical methylene analogues.
Scheme 1. Regioselectivity of Duff Formylation in
Thiacalix[4]arene vs Classical Calix[4]arene Series
Although direct electrophilic substitution represents the
most common upper-rim derivatization method for the
classical series, the same reactions are scarcely used for
thiacalixarenes. Most electrophilic reactions carried out so
far (nitration, bromination) have been based either on the
lower-rim unsubstituted parent thiacalix[4]arenes6 or on
partly substituted derivatives.7 The weak point of this
approach is that the products are not immobilized in specific
conformations; hence, subsequent shaping of the molecule
(alkylation/acylation on the lower rim) is needed. Unfortu-
nately, these reactions frequently lead to unwanted conform-
ers, and in fact, no upper-rim substituted derivative of
thiacalix[4]arene immobilized in the cone conformation has
been reported so far.
In our previous work we have shown that the formylation
of thiacalix[4]arene in the 1,3-alternate conformation leads
surprisingly to meta-substituted products.8 In this paper, we
report unusual regio- or chemoselectivity of formylation
reactions carried out with the cone conformers. These
reactions clearly indicate a remarkably different reactivity
of the thiacalix[4]arene system compared to the classical
calix[4]arene analogue.
Starting compound 1 was prepared from the corresponding
dipropoxy derivative by a known procedure9 (PrI/NaH,
DMF), and its upper-rim substitution was carried out using
the Duff procedure: reaction of the aromatic compound with
hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) in trifluoroacetic acid
(TFA) (Scheme 1). These reaction conditions are well-known
from classical calixarene chemistry where they are used in
the preparation of para-substituted formyl calix[4]arenes.10
Thus, tetraalkyloxy compounds can be smoothly transformed
into tetraformyl derivatives as documented by the transfor-
mation of compound 4 to derivative 5 in 87%.11
showed the presence of two products in an approximately
3:1 ratio which were separated using preparative TLC on
silica gel plates. The main product 2 (isolated in 51% yield)
possesses a rather simple H NMR spectrum, reflecting the
high symmetry of this compound (Figure 1).
1
The Duff formylation was carried out by reacting
thiacalix[4]arene 1 with an excess of urotropin in refluxing
CF3COOH overnight. Analysis of the crude reaction mixture
(6) (a) Lhota´k, P.; Mora´vek, J.; Stibor, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
3665. (b) Shokova, E.; Taffenko, V.; Kovalev, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
43, 5153. (c) Hu, X.; Zhu, Z.; Shen, T.; Shi, X.; Ren, J.; Sun, Q. Can.
J. Chem. 2004, 82, 1266. (d) Desroches, C.; Parola, S.; Vocanson, F.; Perrin,
M.; Lamartine, R.; Letoffe, J. M.; Bouix, J. New. J. Chem. 2002, 26, 651.
(e) Desroches, C.; Lopes, C.; Kessler, V.; Parola, S. Dalton Trans. 2 2003,
2085. (f) Agrawal, Y. K.; Pancholi, J. P. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 2446.
(g) Kasyan, O.; Swierczynski, D.; Drapailo, A.; Suwinska, K.; Lipkowski,
J.; Kalchenko, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7167. (h) Lang, K.; Proskova,
P.; Kroupa, J.; Moravek, J.; Stibor, I.; Pojarova, M.; Lhota´k, P. Dyes
Pigments 2008, 77, 646.
Figure 1.
1H NMR spectrum of compound 2 (CDCl3, 298 K, 600
(7) (a) Lhota´k, P.; Himl, M.; Stibor, I.; Sy´kora, J.; Cisarova, I.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7107. (b) Hu, X.; Shi, H.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Li,
Y.; Yang, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005, 78, 138. (c) Kasyan, O.; Healey,
E. R.; Drapailo, A.; Zaworotko, M.; Cecillon, S.; Coleman, A. W.;
Kalchenko, V. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2007, 58, 127. (d)
Kroupa, J.; Stibor, I.; Pojarova, M.; Tkadlecova, M.; Lhota´k, P. Tetrahedron
2008, 64, 10075.
MHz).
The presence of just two singlets (8.07 and 6.06 ppm) in
the aromatic part of the spectrum indicates that only para-
substituted aromatic rings are present. The reasonable
difference in their chemical shifts (2.0 ppm) is known as a
typical feature of the so-called pinched cone conformation.4c
The intensity of the singlet corresponding to the formyl
groups (9.98 ppm) points to the fact that only two carbonyl
(8) Kundrat, O.; Cisarova, I.; Bo¨hm, B.; Pojarova, M.; Lhotak, P. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4592.
(9) Himl, M.; Pojarova, M.; Stibor, I.; Sykora, J.; Lhota´k, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 461.
(10) Lhotak, P.; Shinkai, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 645.
(11) ondoni, A.; Marra, A.; Scherrmann, M. C.; Casnati, A.; Sansone,
F.; Ungaro, R. Chem.sEur. J. 1997, 3, 1774.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 18, 2009
4189