One-step synthesis of homochiral O-aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic acids and their use as efficient 1H NMR chiral solvating agents

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2009.08.002

Job and Buchwald's one-step copper-promoted arylation of hydroxyl groups was explored and modified so that it could be applied to the coupling of mandelic acid with several halobenzenes and haloheteroarenes. A number of new homochiral O-aryl and O-heteroa

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.tetasy.2009.08.002

Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tetasy
One-step synthesis of homochiral O-aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic acids
1
and their use as efficient H NMR chiral solvating agents
*
Maria Maddalena Cavalluzzi, Claudio Bruno, Giovanni Lentini , Angelo Lovece, Alessia Catalano,
Alessia Carocci, Carlo Franchini
Dipartimento Farmaco-Chimico, Università degli Studi di Bari, via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Job and Buchwald’s one-step copper-promoted arylation of hydroxyl groups was explored and modified
so that it could be applied to the coupling of mandelic acid with several halobenzenes and haloheteroa-
renes. A number of new homochiral O-aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic acids, generally presenting high
enantiomeric purities, were obtained. Although yields were moderate at the best, ranging from 9% to
41%, the reaction was convenient enough to prepare new mandelic acid derivatives, some of which per-
formed as efficient chiral solvating agents (CSAs) for the direct 1H NMR ee value determination of several
clinically and pharmacologically relevant amines.
Received 29 June 2009
Accepted 4 August 2009
Available online 2 September 2009
Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
cally15–18 or pharmacologically15,16,19,20 relevant amines. In
particular, (S)-O-(p-chlorophenyl)mandelic acid 3a was successfully
Mandelic acid O-derivatives and analogs are well-known chiral
solvating agents (CSAs) for the direct 1H NMR determination of the
enantiomeric composition of several classes of homochiral
compounds.1,2 Commercially available O-methyl mandelic acid
used to assess the ee values of mexiletine and two of its ana-
logs,15,16 para-hydroxymexiletine, a major mexiletine metabolite,18
a prolinoxylidide acting as a voltage-gated sodium channel blocking
agent,19 and some 4-methylpiperidine derivatives reported as
r-
(also referred to as
yl mandelic acid (OAMA, also named
1b),3–6 and
-trifluoromethyl-O-methyl mandelic acid (also known
as
a
-methoxyphenylacetic acid, MPA, 1a),3 O-acet-
-acetoxyphenylacetic acid,
receptor ligands.20 (R)-O-(2-Naphthyl)mandelic acid 3b was used
as an alternative to chiral CZE analysis to assess the ee value of
the so-called hydroxymethylmexiletine, one of the major metabo-
lites of mexiletine.18 Homochiral forms of 3a were obtained in
yields ranging from low to moderate by chemical,21 lipase-medi-
ated,22 and dynamic kinetic23 resolution of racemic 3a, 3a methyl
ester, and the 3a imido derivative of (S)-4-isopropyl-1,3-oxazoli-
din-2-one, respectively. The two latter procedures are less time-
consuming than the former, but gave only poorly enriched optically
active forms (ee values 25% and 47%, respectively). Compound (S)-
3a was also obtained by Mitsunobu oxidoreductive condensation
of 4-chlorophenol with (R)-ethyl mandelate followed by hydrazi-
nolysis of the thus-obtained 3a ethyl ester. However, partial race-
mization occurred (3a enantiomeric purity 41%) and the chemical
yield was low (17%).24 Recently, Durst’s four-step procedure25 was
applied to the preparation of highly enriched forms of (S)-3a,15
and (R)- and (S)-3b.26 Looking for a more straightforward entry to
O-aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic acids 4a–h, we considered Job
and Buchwald’s one-step copper-promoted coupling of alcohols27
and aminoalcohols28 with iodoarenes. Here we report the statistical
experimental design (DoE) assisted exploration of Job and
Buchwald’s procedure. Optimal experimental conditions were
found and used in a modified Job and Buchwald’s procedure to ob-
tain highly enriched homochiral 2-substituted phenylacetic acids
4a–h which were tested as 1H NMR CSAs to afford good chiral
a
a
a
-methoxy-a-trifluoromethylphenylacetic acid, MTPA, or
Mosher’s reagent, 2)7–14 are generally used as CSAs for the deter-
mination of the enantiomeric purity of amines.
OR
OAr
COOH
F3C
OMe
COOH
COOH
2
3
1
a: R = Me
b: R = Ac
a: Ar = p-ClC6H4
b: Ar = 2-naphthyl
However, when applied to the formation of diastereomeric salts
with mexiletine, an antiarrhythmic drug, and related compounds,
they caused only poor chemical shift non-equivalences and were
unable to offer sufficient chiral discrimination for ee value determi-
nations, regardless of the experimental conditions used.15 Over the
last few years, O-aryl mandelic acids 3 have been reported as effi-
cient CSAs for the determination of the ee values of some clini-
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 080 5442744; fax: +39 080 5442724.
E-mail address: glentini@farmchim.uniba.it (G. Lentini).
0957-4166/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tetasy.2009.08.002

M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
1985
discrimination on amphetamine 5, mexiletine 6, two newly synthe-
sized mexiletine metabolites—the so-called N- and m-hydroxymex-
iletines 7 and 8, respectively, and other biologically relevant amines
11–13 (Table 3) as well.
used inorganic bases were screened for the coupling reaction. In
summary, we found that the use of Cs2CO3 was crucial for the suc-
cess of the reaction (entry 3), Rb2CO3 was considerably less effec-
tive (entry 9), while CsHCO3, Li2CO3, K2CO3, K3PO4, and BaCO3
afforded no product at all (entries 4–8). The organic base iPr2NEt
was ineffective under our conditions (entry 10). With the best base
determined, in an effort to understand how certain changes in the
reaction conditions would affect the outcome of the coupling pro-
cess, a statistical experimental design (DoE) was used in order to
achieve both higher enantiomeric purity and yield. This allowed
us to search for the optimal experimental conditions while per-
forming a relatively low number of experiments. A two-level full
factorial design was used and the influence of selected variables,
namely, the molar ratio between mandelic acid and aryl iodide
(0.8–1.2), temperature (60–100 °C), and time (5–40 h), was inves-
tigated. The results showed that temperature and reaction time
were the key variables influencing the yield and enantiomeric pur-
ity, while the mandelic acid/aryl iodide ratio had no effect. In par-
ticular, we found that temperature and time were directly
correlated to the yield but inversely correlated to the enantiomeric
purity. A reaction time of 15 h and a temperature of 75 °C provided
the best compromise between the two conflicting goals giving the
desired product (R)-4a in a small amount (17% yield), but enough
to be used as a chiral solvating agent, and with the highest ee (en-
try 11), which could be increased further to 98% by recrystalliza-
tion. When 2-acetylcyclohexanone was used as a ligand,29 the
coupling reaction afforded no product (entry 12). The established
optimal reaction conditions, namely, 5 mol % CuI, 2.0 equiv of
Cs2CO3, and 1.0 equiv of iodobenzene in butyronitrile at 75 °C for
15 h, were then applied to the synthesis of a series of O-aryl and
O-heteroaryl mandelic acids (Table 2). A variety of aryl and hetero-
aryl halides 10a–h were used, with F, Br, or I as leaving groups.
Both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents
were tolerated on the aryl halide reactants giving almost compara-
ble yields of the corresponding O-alkyl derivatives (entries 2, 3, 5,
7, and 8). Generally, when a nuclear nitrogen atom was present at
the 2-position with respect to the halogen, the highest yields were
observed (entries 4–7). In particular, 2-iodopyridine (entry 6) was
at least twice as reactive as iodobenzene (entry 1). It is notable that
the coupling proceeded even with the sterically hindered substrate
2-bromo-3-nitropyridine 10g (entry 7).
R1
R2
X
O
Y
R3
R2
O
R1
NH2
N
COOH
H
6: R1 = R2 = H
5
4a-h
7: R1 = OH; R2 = H
8: R1 = H; R2 = OH
2. Results and discussion
2.1. One-step preparation of O-aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic
acids
Job and Buchwald’s conditions used for the copper-catalyzed
coupling of aryl iodides with aliphatic alcohols27 were initially
examined. The previously used catalyst system for carbon–oxygen
bond formation consisted of copper(I) iodide, 1,10-phenanthroline
as a bidentate nitrogenous ligand, and cesium carbonate as a base
in refluxing toluene. In our initial screening experiments, homochi-
ral mandelic acid (R)-9 and iodobenzene 10a were chosen as test
substrates and subjected to the conditions previously established
for enantiospecific cross-coupling of aryl iodides with aliphatic
alcohols, namely, 10 mol % CuI, 20 mol % 1,10-phenanthroline,
and 2.0 equiv of Cs2CO3, in refluxing toluene for 40 h (Table 1, en-
try 1).27 Unfortunately, the reaction afforded the desired product
(R)-4a in low yield (24%) and partially racemized form (24% enan-
tiomeric purity). To avoid partial racemization, the reaction tem-
perature was lowered to 80 °C but unreacted (R)-9 was recovered
(entry 2). Job and Buchwald’s procedure for O-arylation of amino
alcohols28 was then applied: our first attempt to couple (R)-9 with
10a in refluxing butyronitrile for 14 h resulted in good yield (80%)
but poor enantiomeric purity (36%) (entry 3). Several commonly
Table 1
Selection of ligands, bases, solvents, temperatures, and times of reaction in the O-arylation of (R)-mandelic acid with iodobenzene
OH OPh
COOH
I
CuI
COOH
+
(R)-9
Base
10a
(R)-4a
Entry
Ligand
Solvent
Temp (°C)
Time (h)
Yielda (%)
Enantiomeric purityb,c (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1,10-Phenanthroline
1,10-Phenanthroline
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
CsHCO3
Li2CO3
K2CO3
Toluene
Toluene
110
80
40
24
14
16
16
28
40
16
16
15
15
15
24
0
80
0
0
0
<1
0
15
0
17
<1
24b
—
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
Butyronitrile
125
100
100
110
100
80
100
80
75
36b
—
—
—
K3PO4
n.d.d
—
BaCO3
Rb2CO3
iPr2NEt
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
—
—
—
0.5b
—
10
11
12
93c
n.d.d
2-Acetylcyclohexanone
75
a
b
c
Yield of the isolated product.
Expressed as a ratio of the observed specific rotation to the highest specific rotation value available.15
Ee evaluated by CZE, CSA: 2-hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin.
Not determined.
d

1986
M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
Table 2
Arylation of homochiral mandelic acid with various aryl halidesa
Ar
OH
O
5 mol % CuI
Cs2CO3, butyronitrile
75oC, 15 h
COOH
COOH
Ar-X
+
(R)- and (S)-9
(R)-4a–h and (S)-4b–h
10a–h
Entry
ArX
Compound
% Conversionb
% Yieldc
% ee
93d
I
O
1
27
17
COOH
COOH
10a
4a
OH
I
O
2
3
29 (29)
22 (45)
24 (15)
12 (24)
99d
HO
10b
4b
N
Br
N
I
O
N
99d,e
N
Br
COOH
10c
4c
I
O
N
N
4
5
54 (38)
39 (28)
29 (33)
34 (16)
98d,e
COOH
10d
4d
Br
I
O
N
99d
N
Br
COOH
10e
4e
I
O
N
6
60
41 (45)
98d
N
COOH
10f
4f
O2N
NO2
Br
O
N
7
65 (34)
30 (26)
98d,e
N
COOH
10g
4g
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
8
15 (16)
9 (10)
96d
O
F
F
COOH
F
10h
4h
a
All reactions were carried out using 1 mmol of homochiral mandelic acid, 1.0 equiv of aryl halide, 2.0 equiv of Cs2CO3, and 2.0 mL of butyronitrile; for the sake of
simplicity, only the structures of the (R)-enantiomers obtained starting from (R)-9 have been reported for each entry; ee values refer to (R)-4a–h.
b
Determined by 1H NMR for the (R)-enantiomer and, in parentheses, for the (S)-enantiomer.
Isolated product yield after preparative layer chromatography.
c
d
Ee evaluated by CZE, CSA: 2-hydroxypropyl-b- or
c
-cyclodextrin.
e
Ee evaluated by HPLC on the corresponding methyl ester, chiral stationary phase: Daicel Chiralpak IA.

M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
1987
2.2. O-Aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic acids as chiral shift
observed: when the above reported CSAs were used, the
D
d values
reagents
0.010 and 0.057, respectively, were found for 5 methyl doublets.
Similarly, when 4a was used as the CSA, insufficient chemical shift
Some of the carboxylic acids obtained were evaluated as CSAs
for direct 1H NMR ee determinations (Table 3). Initially, the case
differences, that is, non-equivalences, were obtained (
Fig. 1A and Table 3). On the contrary, the non-equivalence pro-
duced by 4d ( d 0.112, Fig. 1B and Table 3) was significantly higher
than that measured with 4a and the methyl signals of 5 were base-
line resolved. Compound 4d gave good results also in the case of
Dd 0.021,
of commercially available amphetamine
5
was investigated.
D
To the best of our knowledge, cyclodextrins30 and tert-buty-
lphenylphosphinothioic acid31 were previously used as CSAs for
the determination of amphetamine enantiomeric composition by
NMR spectroscopy. However, baseline resolution has never been
mexiletine 6 whose methyl doublet
Dd value was higher than that
previously described using another series of aryl mandelic acids
Table 3
Magnitude of non-equivalences determined in the presence of (R)-CSAs
Entry
1
Amine
Affected protons
Acid
D
da
NH2
CH3CH
4a
4d
0.021
0.112
5
O
NH2
2
3
CH3CH
CH3Ar
4d
3a
4d
3a
0.123
0.101
0.033
0.046
6
O
NH
OH
CH3CH
3a
4f
0.022
0.023
0.022c
0.055
0.013
0.008
0.008
0.018
0.005
0.016
0c
4a
4d
1b
3b
7
b
–
2
3a
4f
CH3Ar
4a
4d
1b
3b
0.019
0
0.012
0
b
–
2
0
HO
O
NH2
4
5
CH3CH
4d
0.296
8
O
CH3C
CH3Ar
4d
4d
0.063
0.058
NH2
11
O
NH2
6
7
CH3CH
4d
4a
1b
0.082d
0d
0
12
H2
HN
O
Ar HC-2
Ar HC-8
3a
4h
3a
4h
0.089
0.119
0
H8
0.050
13
a
b
c
Spectra were registered in CDCl3, unless otherwise noted.
1-(Anthracen-9-yl)-2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (Pirkle’s alcohol) was used as the CSA.
Solvent, benzene-d6.
d
Solvent, toluene-d8.

1988
M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
of the diastereomeric complexes. Generally, the largest chemical
shift differences were induced by 4d on protons adjacent to the ba-
sic center of the molecule. In most cases also protons that were
more distant from nitrogen showed spectral non-equivalences,
but were not sufficiently resolved to allow accurate integration.
An exception was observed with the mexiletine analog 12 (entry
6): despite the formal displacement of the stereocenter from the
basic group by insertion of two methylene spacers, chemical shift
non-equivalences were good for the methyl doublets. The effi-
ciency of 4d might be ascribed to the large anisotropic effect of
the quinoline ring.33
Classic aryloxyaryl acids could sometimes be ineffective for
amines without singlets or doublets in a free high field region of
the 1H NMR spectrum. This is the case for amine 13, which pre-
sents a series of multiplets in the region between 0 and 5 ppm,
and whose only useful signals are in the aromatic region. As a re-
sult, we prepared acid 4h, whose hydrogen atoms of the aryloxy
moiety were substituted by fluorine ones, in order to not obscure
resonances of interest in the region between 6 and 7 ppm. This acid
was able to baseline resolve the doublet signal of the HC-2 on the
aromatic ring (Fig. 3B and Table 3).
Acids 3a, 4d, and 4h were also applied to the determination of
the ee values of amines 6,16 8,34 12,35 and 1336 (Table 3). It is worth
noting that, for each of these compounds, the (R)-enantiomer pre-
sented a downfield sense of the non-equivalence. This finding
could be used to correlate absolute configuration within this series.
1H NMR analyses were performed at room temperature and no
deconvolution software was required.
Figure 1. Variation of
diasteromeric salts with acid 4a (A) and 4d (B). Observed
Table 3.
Dd (CDCl3) for the methyl doublets of amphetamine 5
Dd values are reported in
(entry 2).15 Given the good results obtained in the enantiodiscrim-
ination of 5 and 6, we became interested in checking the applica-
bility of these compounds to the case represented by N-hydroxy
mexiletine 7, a major mexiletine metabolite.32
Our first attempts to determine the enantiomeric composition
of 7 by capillary electrophoresis and chiral HPLC failed. Entry 3
in Table 3 shows the results obtained with several CSAs. O-Hetero-
aryl derivatives performed better than their corresponding carbon
ring equivalents (cf. 4a and 4f, 4d and 3b), thus indicating the ben-
eficial role played by a nitrogen atom in the OAr ring. The best re-
sult was obtained when 4d was used as the CSA (Dd 0.055, Fig. 2D
2.3. Synthesis of N-hydroxymexiletine
and Table 3), suggesting that this quinoline derivative might be
efficient as a CSA on relatively weak bases such as the hydroxyl-
amine 7 (pKa 5.15 0.02, see Section 4).
For compounds 8 and 11, the non-equivalences produced on the
methyl signals in the presence of 4d were 0.296 and 0.063, respec-
Compound (RS)-7 was synthesized following the synthetic
route shown in Scheme 1. It starts from commercially available
2-[({[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]oxy}carbonyl)oxy]-2-methylpro-
pane 14, which was submitted to a Mitsunobu37 reaction with 1-
(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propan-2-ol 15, prepared as previously
described.38 Deprotection of 16 gave (RS)-7.
tively, the former being the highest
Dd value obtained in our study.
Most likely, the hydroxyl group of 8 contributes to the stabilization
Figure 2. Variation of
doublets and methyl singlets of N-hydroxymexiletine (7) diasteromeric salts with
acids 3a (A), 4f (B), 4a (C), and 4d (D). d values are reported in Table 3.
Dd (CDCl3, or benzene-d6 for spectrum C) for the methyl
Figure 3. Variation of
diasteromeric salts with acids 3a (A) and 4h (B).
D
d (CDCl3) for the HC-2 and HC-8 doublets of compound 13
d values are reported in Table 3.
D
D

M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
1989
O
O
O
O
O
OH
O
OH
O
HN
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
15
NH
·CF3COOH
i
ii
14
16
(RS)-7
Scheme 1. Synthesis of (RS)-N-hydroxymexiletine [(RS)-7]. Reagents and conditions: (i) TPP, DIAD, anhydrous THF, 0 °C, 2 h; (ii) CF3COOH 99%/HCOOH 98%, 0 °C, 4 h.
determined by CZE on a BioFocus 3000 CE system (Bio-Rad, USA). A
fused silica capillary of 69.7 cm (effective length 65.2 cm) and
0.05 mm i.d. (Quadrex Corporation) thermostated at 20 °C was used
as a separation tube. The samples (0.1 mg/mL) were pressure in-
jected (15 psi/s) and detected at 214 nm. As background electrolyte,
phosphate buffer (0.035 M), at pH 6.2, and the chiral selector 2-
hydroxypropyl-b-cyclodextrin (40 mg/mL) were used, unless other-
wise indicated. HPLC analyses were performed with an Agilent chro-
matograph (model 1100), equipped with a diode array detector, on a
Daicel Chiralpak IA column (flow rate 0.7 mL/min, k 230 nm, eluent
95:5 hexane/iPrOH, unless otherwise indicated). The ee values of
(R)-4b–d,g and (S)-4b,d were determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization to methyl esters by reaction with an ether solution
of diazomethane. In order to register 1H NMR spectra of the diaste-
reomeric salts, compounds 5–8 and 11–13 were dissolved with
2 equiv of CSA in the appropriate deuterated solvent and the spectra
were registered at 25 °C. EIMS spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-
Packard 6890-5973 MSD gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer at
low resolution. Elemental analyses were performed on a Eurovector
Euro EA 3000 analyzer. Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin
Elmer (Norwalk, CT) Mod 341 spectropolarimeter; concentrations
were expressed in g/100 mL, and the cell length was 1 dm, thus
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, a simple procedure for the rapid synthesis of highly
enantiomerically enriched O-aryl and O-heteroaryl mandelic acids
has been developed. In a one-pot process, aryl and heteroaryl halides
can be coupled to homochiral mandelic acid in yields ranging from
9% to 41% and in excellent enantiomeric purity, making this a supe-
rior method to those described previously.15,21–26 The method
reported herein proceeds smoothly using a diverse array of aryl
and heteroaryl halides; it seems to be applicable to both electron-
deficient and electron-rich substrates, and to sterically hindered
substrates as well. Some of the thus-obtained mandelic acid deriva-
tives 4a,d,f,h were tested as CSAs for direct 1H NMR ee determina-
tions of amines. Generally, CSA usefulness is limited by two main
drawbacks: (1) small separations of the NMR signals of diastereo-
meric salts, which compel to record spectra at low temperature
and/or to use computer-aided deconvolution procedures and (2)
low solubility of the diastereomeric complexes in non-polar sol-
vents, generally required to maximize the observed anisocrony.2
O-Aryl mandelic derivatives 4d and 4h do not suffer from these
drawbacks. In particular, 4d gave chiral discrimination from suffi-
cient to excellent on amines 5–12, allowing ee value determination
even in a case where the stereocenter was displaced from the amine
group by two carbon units 12.35 The quinidine derivative 4d was
even successful with amphetamine 5 and the hydroxylamine 7.
Thus, 4d might be able to allow ee value determinations on weak
amines. The fluorine-containing CSA 4h was applied to ee value
determination of naphthyloxy methyl pyrrolidine 1336 due to its
ability to split signals on the aryloxy moiety. In conclusion, our mod-
ified Job and Buchwald’s one-step copper-promoted arylation of
mandelic acid may serve as a straightforward route to efficient CSAs
and let envisage the possibility for researchers to obtain CSAs specif-
ically tailored on their own homochiral amines.
½
a 2D0 values were given in units of 10ꢀ1 deg cm2 gꢀ1. Chromato-
ꢁ
graphic separations were performed on silica gel columns by flash
chromatography (Kieselgel 60, 0.040–0.063 mm, Merck, Darmstadt,
Germany) using the technique described by Still et al.40 Preparative
layer chromatography analyses were performed on 2 mm precoated
silica gel on glass plates (20 ꢂ 20 cm) (Kieselgel 60F254, Merck). TLC
analyseswereperformedonprecoatedsilicagelonaluminumsheets
(Kieselgel 60F254, Merck).
4.1.1. General procedure for the preparation of O-aryl mandelic
acids 4a–h
A mixture of homochiral mandelic acid 9 (2.45 mmol), aryl
halides 10a–h (2.45 mmol), Cs2CO3 (4.90 mmol), and CuI (5%) in
butyronitrile (2 mL) was heated to 75 °C under an N2 atmosphere
for 15 h. The solvent was then removed under vacuum; the residue
was taken up with water and washed two times with EtOAc. The
aqueous phase was acidified in citric acid and extracted three
times with EtOAc. The combined organic phases were dried over
Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum. The yield of the crude
product was determined by 1H NMR. The residue was then purified
by preparative layer chromatography (EtOAc) to give the desired
product (4a–h).
4. Experimental
4.1. Chemistry
All chemicals were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich or Lancaster.
Compound 10d was obtained from 2-chloroquinoline following a
previously reported procedure.39 The solvents were of RP grade
unless otherwise indicated. The structures of the compounds were
confirmed by routine spectroscopic analyses. Only spectra for
compounds not described previously are given. Melting points were
determined on a Gallenkamp melting point apparatus in open glass
capillary tubes and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were recorded on
a Perkin–Elmer (Norwalk, CT) Spectrum One FT spectrophotometer
and band positions are given in reciprocal centimeters (cmꢀ1). Rou-
tine 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mer-
cury-VX spectrometer operating at 300 and 75 MHz for 1H and 13C,
respectively, using CDCl3, DMSO-d6, or CD3OD (where indicated) as
a solvent. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) rel-
ative to theresidual non-deuterated solventresonance: CDCl3, d 7.26
(1H NMR) and d 77.2 (13C NMR), unless otherwise indicated; CD3OD,
d 3.30 (1H NMR) and 46.3 (13C NMR); DMSO-d6, d 2.47 (1H NMR). J
values are given in Hertz. The ee values of (R)-4a–h and (S)-4f were
4.1.2. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-Phenoxy-2-phenylacetic acid (ꢀ)-(R)-4a
Yield: 17%; mp 109–111 °C (CHCl3/hexane), lit:15 117–118 °C
(hexane) for the S enantiomer; ½a D20
¼ ꢀ114 (c 1, MeOH), ee 93%
ꢁ
(CZE), lit:15
½
a 2D0
ꢁ
¼ þ120 (c 1.1, MeOH), ee 97% (HPLC) for the (S)-
enantiomer. Spectroscopic data were in agreement with those re-
ported in the literature for the S enantiomer.15
4.1.3. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-(4-Hydroxyphenoxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(ꢀ)-(R)-4b
Yield: 24%; mp 181–182 °C; ½a D20
¼ ꢀ101 (c 1, MeOH), 99% ee
ꢁ
(CZE); IR (KBr): 3259 (OH), 1721 (C@O) cmꢀ1 1H NMR (CD3OD):
;

1990
M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
d 5.56 (s, 1H), 6.65–6.70 (m, 2H), 6.80–6.85 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.40 (m,
3H), 7.50–7.60 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (CD3OD): d 79.5 (1C), 115.6 (2C),
116.9 (2C), 127.2 (2C), 128.4 (2C), 128.6 (1C), 136.7 (1C), 150.8
(1C), 152.0 (1C), 172.8 (1C); GC–MS (70 eV) (methyl ester) m/z
(%) 258 (M+, 24), 121 (100). Anal. Calcd for (C14H12O4ꢃ0.3H2O): C,
67.42; H, 5.08. Found: C, 67.38; H, 5.12.
4.1.10. (+)-(S)-2-(5-Bromopyridin-2-yloxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(+)-(S)-4e
Yield: 16%; mp 166–167 °C; ½a D20
¼ þ102 (c 1, MeOH). Spectro-
ꢁ
scopic data were in agreement with those found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4e.
4.1.11. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-Phenyl-2-(pyridin-2-yloxy)acetic acid
(ꢀ)-(R)-4f
Yield: 41%; mp 107–108 °C; ½a D20
ꢁ
¼ ꢀ148 (c 1, MeOH), 98% ee
4.1.4. (+)-(S)-2-(4-Hydroxyphenoxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(+)-(S)-4b
(CZE: pH 5.5); IR (KBr): 3442 (OH), 1733 (C@O) cmꢀ1
;
1H NMR: d
Yield: 15%; mp 187–188 °C; ½a D20
¼ þ115 (c 1, MeOH), 98% ee
ꢁ
6.23 (s, 1H, CH), 6.91 (d overlapping apparent t at 6.92, J = 7.8 Hz,
1H), 6.92 (apparent t overlapping d at 6.91, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35–
7.45 (m, 3H), 7.55–7.65 (m, 3H), 8.12 (dd, J = 5.5, 1.4 Hz, 1H),
9.12 (br s, 1H); 13C NMR: d 75.5 (1C), 111.5 (1C), 118.0 (1C),
127.9 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 129.3 (1C), 134.8 (1C), 139.3 (1C), 146.8
(1C), 162.4 (1C), 175.8 (1C); GC-MS (70 eV) (methyl ester) m/z
(%) 243 (M+, 44), 184 (100). Anal. Calcd for (C13H11NO3ꢃ0.25H2O):
C, 66.80; H, 4.96; N, 5.99. Found: C, 66.74; H, 4.92; N, 5.91.
(HPLC: flow rate 1.5 mL/min, eluent 97:3 hexane/iPrOH). Spectro-
scopic data were in agreement with those found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4b.
4.1.5. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-(5-Bromopyrimidin-2-yloxy)-2-phenylacetic
acid (ꢀ)-(R)-4c
Yield: 12%; mp 140–141 °C; ½a D20
¼ ꢀ102 (c 1, MeOH), 99% ee
ꢁ
(CZE), 98% ee (HPLC); IR (KBr): 2964 (OH), 1717 (C@O) cmꢀ1 1H
;
NMR: d 6.12 (s, 1H), 6.70 (br s, 1H), 7.30–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.55–7.70
(m, 2H), 8.56 (s, 2H); 13C NMR: d 77.4 (1C), 113.2 (1C), 127.9
(2C), 129.0 (2C), 129.6 (1C), 133.6 (1C), 160.0 (2C), 162.8 (1C),
173.8 (1C); GC-MS (70 eV) (methyl ester) m/z (%) 322 (M+, 11),
263 (100). Anal. Calcd for (C12H9BrN2O3ꢃ0.33H2O): C, 45.74; H,
3.09; N, 8.89. Found: C, 45.76; H, 3.18; N, 8.64.
4.1.12. (+)-(S)-Phenyl(pyridin-2-yloxy)acetic acid (+)-(S)-4f
Yield: 45%; mp 108–109 °C; ½a D20
¼ þ147 (c 1, MeOH), 98% ee
ꢁ
(CZE: pH 5.5). Anal. Calcd for (C13H11NO3ꢃ0.10H2O): C, 67.58; H,
4.89; N, 6.06. Found: C, 67.63; H, 4.88; N, 6.03. Spectroscopic data
were in agreement with those found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4f.
4.1.13. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-(3-Nitropyridin-2-yloxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(ꢀ)-(R)-4g
4.1.6. (+)-(S)-(5-Bromopyrimidin-2-yloxy)phenylacetic acid
(+)-(S)-4c
Yield: 30%; mp 113–114 °C; ½a D20
¼ ꢀ141 (c 1, MeOH), 98% ee
ꢁ
Yield: 24%; mp 133–134 °C; ½a D20
¼ þ105 (c 1, MeOH). Anal.
ꢁ
(CZE: pH 5.5), 98% ee (HPLC); IR (KBr): 2922 (OH), 1706 (C@O)
Calcd for (C14H9BrN2O3ꢃ1.33H2O): C, 43.26; H, 3.53; N, 8.41. Found:
C, 43.27; H, 3.57; N, 8.05. Spectroscopic data were in agreement
with those found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4c.
cmꢀ1 1H NMR: d 6.10 (br s, 1H), 6.35 (s, 1H), 7.13 (dd, J = 8.0,
;
5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.65–7.75 (m, 2H), 8.35–8.45 (m,
2H); 13C NMR: d 76.4 (1C), 118.0 (1C), 127.5 (2C), 129.0 (2C),
129.5 (1C), 133.4 (1C), 134.0 (1C), 135.8 (1C), 151.6 (1C), 155.0
(1C), 174.3 (1C); MS (70 eV) (methyl ester) m/z (%) 288 (M+, <1),
124 (100). Anal. Calcd for (C13H10N2O5ꢃ0.66H2O): C, 54.55; H,
3.99; N, 9.79. Found: C, 54.81; H, 3.88; N, 9.45.
4.1.7. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-Phenyl-2-(quinolin-2-yloxy)acetic acid (ꢀ)-(R)-
4d
Yield: 39%; mp 122–123 °C (CHCl3/hexane); ½a D20
¼ ꢀ167 (c 1,
ꢁ
MeOH), 98% ee (capillary electrophoresis: pH 5.5, 2-hydroxypro-
pyl-
c
-cyclodextrin), 98% ee (HPLC: flow rate 0.6 mL/min); IR
4.1.14. (+)-(S)-2-(3-Nitropyridin-2-yloxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(+)-(S)-4g
(KBr): 2906 (OH), 1724 (C@O) cmꢀ1
;
1H NMR: d 6.43 (s, 1H), 7.07
Yield: 26%; mp 111–112 °C; ½a D20
¼ þ142 (c 1, MeOH). Spectro-
ꢁ
(d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.58 (t overlapping t at
7.59, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (t overlapping t at 7.58, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H),
7.60–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.74 (d overlapping d at 7.77, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H),
7.77 (d overlapping d at 7.74, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.8 Hz,
1H), 9.00 (br s, 1H); 13C NMR: d 75.8 (1C), 112.8 (1C), 124.8 (1C),
125.7 (1C), 127.6 (2C), 128.0 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 129.3 (1C), 129.9
(1C), 134.9 (1C), 139.7 (1C), 146.1 (1C), 160.7 (1C), 175.5 (1C). Anal.
Calcd for (C17H13NO3ꢃ0.66H2O): C, 70.09; H, 4.96; N, 4.81. Found: C,
70.21; H, 4.66; N, 4.77.
scopic data were in agreement with those found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4g.
4.1.15. (ꢀ)-(2R)-2-(Pentafluorophenoxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(ꢀ)-(R)-4h
Yield: 9%; mp 100–101 °C; ½a D20
¼ ꢀ157 (c 1, MeOH), 96% ee
ꢁ
(CZE: pH 5.5); IR (KBr): 3205 (OH), 1745, 1710 (C@O) cmꢀ1 1H
;
NMR: d 4.95 (br s, 1H), 5.78 (s, 1H), 7.35–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.45–7.55
(m, 2H); 13C NMR: d 82.5 (1C), 127.9 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 130.4 (1C),
133.5 (1C), 136.5 (2C), 139.8 (2C), 139.9 (1C), 143.5 (1C), 173.1
(1C); MS (70 eV) (methyl ester) m/z (%) 332 (M+, <1), 149 (100).
4.1.8. (+)-(S)-2-Phenyl-2-(quinolin-2-yloxy)acetic acid
(+)-(S)-4d
Yield: 33%; mp 123–124 °C (CHCl3/hexane); ½a D20
¼ þ173 (c 1,
ꢁ
4.1.16. (+)-(2S)-2-(Pentafluorophenoxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(+)-(S)-4h
MeOH), 98% ee (HPLC: flow rate 0.6 mL/min). Anal. Calcd for
(C17H13NO3ꢃ0.25H2O): C, 71.95; H, 4.79; N, 4.94. Found: C, 71.89;
H, 4.79; N, 4.84. Spectroscopic data were in agreement with those
found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4d.
Yield: 10%; mp 98–99 °C; ½a D20
¼ þ134 (c 1, MeOH). Spectro-
ꢁ
scopic data were in agreement with those found for (ꢀ)-(R)-4h.
4.1.17. (RS)-tert-Butyl [2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylethyl]-
[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)oxy]carbamate 16
4.1.9. (ꢀ)-(R)-2-(5-Bromopyridin-2-yloxy)-2-phenylacetic acid
(ꢀ)-(R)-4e
To a stirred solution of 2-[({[(tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]oxy}-
carbonyl)oxy]-2-methylpropane 14 (1.80 g, 7.7 mmol), (RS)-1-
(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)propan-2-ol 15 (0.92 g, 5.1 mmol), and
triphenylphosphine (2.02 g, 7.7 mmol) in dry THF (120 mL), under
an argon atmosphere, a solution of DIAD (1.55 g, 7.7 mmol) in dry
THF (60 mL) was added dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C
for 2 h. The solvent was then evaporated under reduced pressure,
after which Et2O was added and the precipitate formed was filtered
off. The filtrate was evaporated in vacuo and the residue was
Yield: 34%; mp 164–165 °C; ½a D20
¼ ꢀ104 (c 1, MeOH), 99% ee
ꢁ
(CZE: pH 5.5); IR (KBr): 3162 (OH), 1745, 1705 (C@O) cmꢀ1 1H
;
NMR: d 6.15 (s, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.45 (m, 3H),
7.55–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.70 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 1.9 Hz,
1H), 8.70 (br s, 1H); 13C NMR: d 75.8 (1C), 113.0 (1C), 113.1 (1C),
127.9 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 129.5 (1C), 134.4 (1C), 141.9 (1C), 147.4
(1C), 161.2 (1C), 175.3 (1C); MS (70 eV) (methyl ester) m/z (%)
321 (M+, 28), 121 (100).

M. M. Cavalluzzi et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 20 (2009) 1984–1991
1991
5. Parker, D.; Taylor, R. J. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5451–5456.
6. Caira, M. R.; Hunter, R.; Nassimbeni, L. R.; Stevens, A. T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1999, 10, 2175–2189.
7. Buddrus, J.; Herzog, H.; Risch, K. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 40–42.
8. Baxter, C. A. R.; Richards, H. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3357–3358.
9. Navrátilová, H. Chirality 2001, 13, 731–735.
purified by flash chromatography (eluent EtOAc/petroleum ether
0.5:9.5) to give 1.73 g of a colorless oil (86%): IR (neat): 1789
(OCOO), 1740 (NHCOO) cmꢀ1 1H NMR: d 1.47 (br s overlapping
;
br s at 1.52, 9H), 1.52 (br s overlapping br s at 1.47, 12H), 2.27
(s, 6H), 3.60–3.75 (m, 1H), 3.75–3.90 (m, 1H), 4.55–4.75 (m, 1H),
7.06 (m, 1H), 6.95–7.05 (m, 2H); MS (70 eV) m/z (%) 205
(M+ꢀ190, 4), 57 (100).
ˇ ˇ
10. Navrátilová, H.; de Gelder, R.; Kríz, Z. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2002, 2093–
2099.
11. Benson, S. C.; Cai, P.; Colon, M.; Haiza, M. A.; Tokles, M.; Snyder, J. K. J. Org.
Chem. 1988, 53, 5335–5341.
12. Dyllick-Brenzinger, R.; Roberts, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 1166–1167.
13. Villani, F. J., Jr.; Costanzo, M. J.; Inners, R. R.; Mutter, M. S.; McClure, D. E. J. Org.
Chem. 1986, 51, 3715–3718.
14. Shapiro, M. J.; Archinal, A. E.; Jarema, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5826–5828.
15. Carbonara, G.; Carocci, A.; Fracchiolla, G.; Franchini, C.; Lentini, G.; Loiodice, F.;
Tortorella, P. ARKIVOC 2004, part v, 5–25.
16. Carocci, A.; Catalano, A.; Corbo, F.; Duranti, A.; Amoroso, R.; Franchini, C.;
Lentini, G.; Tortorella, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 3619–3634.
17. Cavalluzzi, M. M.; Catalano, A.; Bruno, C.; Lovece, A.; Carocci, A.; Corbo, F.;
Franchini, C.; Lentini, G.; Tortorella, V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 2409–
2417.
18. Catalano, A.; Carocci, A.; Fracchiolla, G.; Franchini, C.; Lentini, G.; Tortorella, V.;
De Luca, A.; De Bellis, M.; Desaphy, J.-F.; Conte Camerino, D. Chirality 2004, 16,
72–78.
19. Franchini, C.; Corbo, F.; Lentini, G.; Bruno, G.; Scilimati, A.; Tortorella, V.; Conte
Camerino, D.; De Luca, A. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3792–3798.
20. Berardi, F.; Loiodice, F.; Fracchiolla, G.; Colabufo, N. A.; Perrone, R.; Tortorella,
V. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2117–2124.
21. Bettoni, G.; Ferorelli, S.; Loiodice, F.; Tangari, N.; Tortorella, V.; Gasparrini, F.;
Misiti, D.; Villani, C. Chirality 1992, 4, 193–203.
4.1.18. (RS)-1-(2,6-Dimethylphenoxy)-N-hydroxypropan-2-amine
trifluoroacetate (RS)-7ꢃCF3COOH
(RS)-tert-Butyl [2-(2,6-dimethylphenoxy)-1-methylethyl][(tert-
butoxycarbonyl)oxy]carbamate (RS)-16 (0.80 g, 2.0 mmol) was dis-
solved, under an argon atmosphere, in a mixture of 98% HCOOH
(20 mL) and 99% CF3COOH (15 mL). The reaction mixture was stir-
red at 0 °C for 4 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum; the
residue was taken up with EtOAc and washed with brine. The or-
ganic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum
to give (RS)-7ꢃCF3COOH as a slightly yellowish solid, which was
recrystallized from iPr2O/hexane to give 0.36 g (58%) of white crys-
tals: IR (CHCl3): 3232 (OH), 1668 (C@O) cmꢀ1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6):
d 1.34 (br d, J = 5.5 Hz, 3H), 2.22 (s, 6H), 3.60–3.80 (br s, 1H), 3.80–
4.00 (m, 2H), 6.95–7.0 (m, 1H), 7.0–7.05 (m, 2H), 11.0 (br s, 1H),
11.3 (br s, 2H). Anal. Calcd for (C13H18F3NO4): C, 50.48; H, 5.87;
N, 4.53. Found: C, 50.78; H, 5.94; N, 4.62.
22. Chiaia Noya, F.; Ferorelli, S.; Franchini, C.; Scilimati, A.; Sinicropi, M. S.;
Tortorella, P. Farmaco 1996, 51, 293–296.
23. Amoroso, R.; Bettoni, G.; De Filippis, B.; Tricca, M. L. Chirality 1999, 11, 483–
486.
24. Rangwala, S. M.; O’Brien, M. L.; Tortorella, V.; Longo, A.; Loiodice, F.; Noonan, D.
J.; Feller, D. R. Chirality 1997, 9, 37–47.
4.2. Physicochemical data
The pKa value for compound 7 was obtained by a pH metric tech-
nique using a GlpKa apparatus (Sirius Analytical Instruments Ltd,
Forrest Row, East Sussex, UK).41–44 Due to the low solubility of the
compound investigated in aqueous medium, methanol was used
as a cosolvent for pKa measurements. Three separate solutions of a
concentration approximately 10ꢀ5 M, in 10–30% w/w (MeOH/
H2O), were prepared. They were then acidified with 0.5 M HCl to
pH 3. The solutions were then titrated with 0.5 M KOH to pH 12.
The initial pKa value, which is the apparent ionization constant rela-
tive to the mixture of the solvents, was obtained by Bjerrum Plot,
that is, the curve obtained by the difference between the curve of
titration of the ionizable substance and that of the blank solution.
This value was then optimized by a weighed nonlinear least-squares
procedure (Refinement Pro 1.0 software) to obtain a pKa value in the
absence of a cosolvent, by extrapolation using the Yasuda–Shedlov-
sky equation.45 All titrations were carried out at 25 0.1 °C under
nitrogen gas atmosphere to exclude CO2.
25. Koh, K.; Durst, T. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4683–4686.
26. Massolini, G.; Fracchiolla, G.; Calleri, E.; Carbonara, G.; Temporini, C.;
Lavecchia, A.; Cosconati, S.; Novellino, E.; Loiodice, F. Chirality 2006, 18, 633–
643.
27. Wolter, M.; Nordmann, G.; Job, G. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 973–976.
28. Job, G. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3703–3706.
29. Shafir, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8742–8743.
30. Thunhorst, M.; Holzgrabe, U. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1998, 36, 211–216.
31. Omelan´ czuk, J.; Mikolajczyk, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2687–2694.
32. Beckett, A. H.; Chidomere, E. C. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1977, 29, 281–285.
33. Kühn, M.; Buddrus, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 207–210.
34. Catalano, A.; Cavalluzzi, M. M.; Di Mola, A.; Bruno, C.; Carocci, A.; Lentini, G.;
Franchini, C. Metabolic Derivatives of Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Stereospecific
Synthesis of N-Hydroxymexiletine and meta-Hydroxymexiletine. XIX National
Meeting on Medicinal Chemistry, Verona, 14–18 September 2008.
35. Carocci, A.; Catalano, A.; Bruno, C.; Lentini, G.; Franchini, C.; De Bellis, M.; De
Luca, A.; Conte Camerino, D. Chirality, 2009, doi: 10.1002/chir. 20741 online
(www.interscience.wiley.com).
36. Lentini, G.; Carocci, A.; Catalano, A.; Colabufo, N. A.; Franchini, C.; Tortorella, V.
Arilossialchilammine come ligandi per i recettori 5-HT1B/1D: Bioisosteria, chiralità e
selettività. XVIII Convegno Nazionale della Divisione di Chimica Farmaceutica
della Società Chimica Italiana, Chieti-Pescara, 16–20 September 2007.
37. (a) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1–28; (b) Knight, D. W.; Leese, M. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2593–2595.
Acknowledgment
38. Carocci, A.; Franchini, C.; Lentini, G.; Loiodice, F.; Tortorella, V. Chirality 2000,
12, 103–106.
This work was accomplished, thanks to the financial support of
the Ministero dell’Istruzione dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR).
39. Corcoran, R. C.; Bang, S. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 47, 6757–6758.
40. Still, W. C.; Kahn, M.; Mitra, A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2923–2925.
41. Comer, J. E.; Tam, K. Y. Lipophilicity Profiles: Theory and Measurement. In
Pharmacokinetic Optimization in Drug Research; Testa, B., van de Waterbeemd,
H., Folkers, G., Guy, R. H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Zürich, Switzerland, 2001; pp 275–
304.
References
42. Avdeef, A. Quant. Struct.–Act. Relat. 1992, 11, 510–517.
43. Avdeef, A. J. Pharm. Sci. 1993, 82, 183–190.
44. Avdeef, A. Assessment of Distribution-pH. In Lipophilicity in Drug Action and
Toxicology; Pilska, V., Testa, B., van de Waterbeemd, H., Eds.; VCH Publishers:
Weinheim, Germany, 1996; pp 109–139.
1. Wenzel, T. J. Aryl-containing Carboxylic Acids. In: Discrimination of Chiral
Compounds Using NMR Spectroscopy; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp
8–57.
2. Parker, D. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 1441–1457.
3. Prestat, G.; Marchand, A.; Lebreton, J.; Guingant, A.; Pradère, J.-P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1998, 9, 197–201.
45. Avdeef, A.; Box, K. J.; Comer, J. E.; Gilges, M.; Hadley, M.; Hibbert, C.; Patterson,
W.; Tam, K. Y. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1999, 20, 631–641.
4. Drandarov, K.; Guggisberg, A.; Hesse, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 979–989.