for 18 h. Palladium acetate 1a and pincer complex 1b
proved to be equally efficient catalysts for model substrate
2a (cf. entries 1 and 2). For this reason, and because of
its commercial availability, the majority of the reactions
were performed using 1a. However, the fact that 1b readily
catalyzed the process provided a handle for the exploration
of some important mechanistic aspects of the reaction
(vide infra). Most of the acetoxylation reactions (entries
1, 2, 5, and 7-10) were performed in acetic acid with 3a
in the presence of KOAc.
Table 1. Pd-Catalyzed C-H Acetoxylation and
Benzoyloxylation of Alkenes with Iodonium Saltsa
The benzoyloxylation reactions (entries 4 and 6) were
conducted with 3b as oxidant in the presence of LiOBz
in MeCN solvent. Thus, the catalytic C-H benzyloxyla-
tion could be performed under slightly basic conditions,
which is not possible with BQ as oxidant (vide supra).
We found that the acetoxylation reaction can also be
performed under similar nonacidic conditions (entry 3).
The catalytic reactions proceeded smoothly with both
terminal (2a) and internal (2b-f) alkenes. In the case of
carboxylates 2a-d we did not observe isomerization
reported for the classical Pd(0)/Pd(II) reactions, in which
BQ pentyl nitrite or CuCl2 were used as oxidants.2h Our
conditions gave exclusively one regio- and stereoisomer
of each product. The only exception was the acetoxylation
of 2e in which the cis and trans products were formed in
a 1:1 ratio. In the case of 2b-d, the alkyl chain length
did not influence the selectivity of the reaction. Acetoxy-
lation of cyclohexene (2f) was performed with high
regioselectivity without formation of the vinyl-substituted
product (entry 10).
We were particularly interested in exploring two basic
mechanistic aspects of the catalytic process: (1) the
mechanism of the nucleophilic attack and (2) the oxidation
state of the palladium under the reaction conditions. The
nucleophilic attack of the C-H acetoxylation reaction can
proceed by two different mechanisms.2c,d One possibility
is the formation of an (η3-allyl)palladium (such as 5, eq 2)
followed by nucleophilic attack of the acetate. The other
possibility is an acetoxy-palladation (through intermediates
such as 6, eq 3), followed by ꢀ-hydride elimination to give
the final product. To differentiate between these two mech-
anisms, we carried out an isotope labeling study with
monodeuterated cyclohexene (2f-1d). Using this substrate
two different (η3-allyl)palladium complexes (5a and 5b, eq
2) may be expected to form, each of which could react with
the nucleophile at either of the terminal positions. This would
give three allylic acetoxy products, 4h-1d, 4h-2d, and 4h-
3d, in an expected 1:2:1 ratio. Alternatively, if the palladium
complex undergoes acetoxy-palladation, two insertion com-
plexes may form: 6a and 6b (eq 3). Subsequent ꢀ-hydride
elimination would give two allylic acetates 4h-1d and 4h-
2d in a 1:1 ratio. In this case, formation of 4h-3d (in which
a Alkene 2 (0.3 mmol), iodonium salt 3 (0.6 mmol), catalyst 1 (5 mol
%), and KOAc (0.3 mmol) or LiOBz (0.3 mmol) were dissolved/suspended
in the indicated solvent (1 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at 40
°C for 18 h. KOAc and LiOBz were used with oxidants 3a and 3b,
respectively. b Isolated yield. c Cis and trans isomers formed in a 1:1 ratio.
Under our conditions, alkene 2 (0.3 mmol), iodonium
salt 3 (0.6 mmol), catalyst 1 (5 mol %), and the appropriate
carboxylate salt base were reacted in AcOH or MeCN.
Potassium acetate was used with PhI(OAc)2 (3a), while
lithium benzoate was used with PhI(OBz)2 (3b). The
reactions were conducted under mild conditions (40 °C)
(3) (a) Ba¨ckvall, J. E.; Bystro¨m, S. E.; Nordberg, R. E. J. Org. Chem.
1984, 49, 4619. (b) Ba¨ckvall, J.-E.; Gogoll, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
2243. (c) Szabo´, K. J. Organometallics 1998, 17, 1677.
(4) (a) Canty, A. J.; Rodemann, T.; Ryan, J. H. AdV. Organomet. Chem.,
Vol. 55, Elsevier, New York, 2008, p. 279. (b) Canty, A. J. Dalton Trans.
2009, DOI: 10.1039/b914080h. (c) Deprez, N. R.; Sanford, M. S. Inorg.
Chem. 2007, 46, 1924. (d) Stowers, K. J.; Sanford, M. S. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 4584. (e) Dick, A. R.; Hull, K. L.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 2300. (f) Daugulis, O.; Zaitsev, V. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 4046. (g) Tong, X.; Beller, M.; Tse, M. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 4906. (h) Mun˜iz, K.; Ho¨velmann, C. H.; Streuff, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 763. (i) Liu, G.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
7179. (j) Bressy, C.; Alberico, D.; Lautens, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 13148. (k) Alexanian, E. J.; Lee, C.; Sorensen, E. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 7690. (l) Aydin, J.; Larsson, J. M.; Selander, N.; Szabo´,
K. J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2852. (m) Merritt, E. A.; Olofsson, B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904689.
(5) (a) Lagunas, M.-C.; Gossage, R. A.; Spek, A. L.; van Koten, G.
Organometallics 1998, 17, 731. (b) Canty, A. J.; Rodemann, T.; Skelton,
B. W.; White, A. H. Organometallics 2006, 25, 3996. (c) Dick, A. R.;
Kampf, J. W.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12790. (d)
Racowski, J. M.; Dick, A. R.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 10974.
(6) Stang, P. J.; Boehshar, M.; Wingert, H.; Kitamura, T. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1988, 110, 3272.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 23, 2009
5519