Article
Recent researches have revealed another interesting photo-
Yin et al.
SRG inscription were studied by using the amorphous molecular
materials. Both photoinducedsurface deformation effects showed
close correlation with the chromophore structures. Under the
same test conditions, only molecular azo glass containing
4-cyanoazobenzene moieties (Tr-AZ-CN) exhibited the ability
to form hexagonal surface structures when irradiated with a
uniform laser beam at normal incidence. Under proper experi-
mental conditions, both self-structured surface pattern and SRGs
were observed to be formed on the same Tr-AZ-CN film. The
experimental detail, results and discussion will be presented in the
following sections.
induced effect on azo polymer film surfaces, which is known as
spontaneous surface pattern formation through light irradia-
tion.22 It is characterized by the spontaneous formation of
submicrometer hexagonal patterns on the azo polymer films after
irradiation with a uniform single laser beam at normal incidence.
The patterns comprise regularly spaced pillar-like structures with
saturated height about 100 nm. The influence of experimental
parameters, such as polarization of the laser beam, irradiation
time and intensity, has been investigated.23 In comparison with
the extensive exploration of the SRG formation, research effort
devoted to the photoinduced self-structured pattern formation is
rather limited. Although it has been understood that the azo
chromophore also plays a key role in the process, the influence of
different molecular structures on this effect is still unclear at the
moment. To our knowledge, formation of the self-structured
surface pattern has been observed only for a poly(methyl
methacrylate)-based copolymer (DR1MA/MMA 35/65) among
few others.22-24
Molecular glass, also named as “amorphous molecular materi-
als”, is a new type of glassy materials related to some well-
designed low-molecular-weight organic compounds.25,26 The
amorphous molecular materials show glass-transition behavior
similar to amorphous polymeric materials. On the other hand,
molecular glass possesses well-defined structures and often shows
better reproducible properties compared with polymers. By using
the common spin-coating method, thin solid films with a smooth
surface can be feasibly prepared from the amorphous molecular
materials. Formation of SRGs on molecular azo glass films has
recently been reported by several groups.27-30 Results show that
SRGs can be inscribed on molecular azo glass films with a faster
rate compared to those observed for azo polymers. Very recently,
it has been reported that complex periodic superstructures can be
induced under high interferential illumination of small-molecule-
based photochromic materials.31 The superstructures show an
amplitude much larger than the initial film thickness. A logical
inference could be that the self-structured surface patterns
should be more easily observed on films of molecular azo glass.
Because of the well-defined structures, molecular azo glass
could be a desirable type of materials for studying the possible
influence ofthe molecular structuresonthe self-structured pattern
formation.
Experimental Section
Tr-AN Synthesis. 1,3,5-Triglycidyl isocyanurate (2.97 g,
0.01 mol) and N-methylaniline (4.28 g, 0.04 mol) were mixed
and slowly heated in the reactor. After the solid was melted, the
mixture was continuously stirred and kept at 110 °C for 8 h. The
product was dissolved in THF (50 mL) and then precipitated
with petroleum ether. The solid was collected by filtration and
dried in a vacuum oven at 70 °C for 24 h. The crude product
was further purified by column chromatography (CH2Cl2, the
1
first component). Yield: 85%. H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ (ppm):
2.92 (s, 9H), 3.20 (m, 3H), 3.45 (m, 3H), 3.68 (m, 3H), 3.90
(m, 3H), 4.07 (m, 3H), 4.91 (d, 3H), 6.57 (t, 3H), 6.66 (d, 6H), 7.12
(t, 6H).
Tr-AZ-CN Synthesis. 4-Aminobenzontrile (0.59 g, 5 mmol)
was mixed with of sulfuric acid (0.5 mL) and glacial acetic acid
(12 mL). Diazonium salt was prepared by slowly adding an aqueous
solution of sodium nitrite (0.4 g, 5.78 mmol in 1 mL of water) into
the 4-aminobenzontrile solution. The mixture was stirred at 5 °C for
5 min and then added dropwise into a solution of Tr-AN (0.618 g,
1 mmol) in DMF (60 mL). The solution was stirred at 0 °C for 8 h
and then poured into plenty of water. The precipitate collected by
filtration was dissolved in THF and precipitated with petroleum
ether. The final product was vacuum-dried at 70 °C for 24 h. Yield:
87%. DSC: Tg 123 °C. MS: MW 1006.43 (calcd 1006.11). IR (KBr,
cm-1): 3440 (O-H), 2910 (-CH2), 2224 (CtN), 1693 (CdO),
1597, 1516 (benzene ring). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ (ppm): 3.13 (s,
9H), 3.40 (m, 3H), 3.70 (m, 3H), 3.80 (m, 3H), 3.95 (m, 3H), 4.16 (m,
3H), 5.21 (d, 3H), 6.86 (d, 6H), 7.80 (d, 6H), 7.83 (d, 6H), 7.95 (d,
6H). UV-vis (DMF): 463 nm.
Tr-AZ-NT Synthesis. This compound was synthesized by
the azo-coupling reaction between Tr-AN and diazonium salt of
4-nitroaniline via similar method mentioned above. Yield: 85%.
DSC: Tg 119 °C. MS: MW 1066.40 (calcd. 1066.07). IR (KBr,
cm-1): 3430 (O-H), 2920 (-CH2), 1700 (CdO), 1600, 1510
In this study, three star-shaped azo compounds were synthe-
sized to contain push-pull type azo chromophores with different
structures. The self-structured surface pattern formation and
1
(benzene ring), 1345 (-NO2). H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ (ppm):
3.14 (s, 9H), 3.42 (m, 3H), 3.70 (m, 3H), 3.81 (m, 3H), 3.96 (m,
3H), 4.17 (m, 3H), 5.22 (d, 3H), 6.88 (d, 6H), 7.82 (d, 6H), 7.88 (d,
6H), 8.32 (d, 6H). UV-vis (DMF): 491 nm.
(22) Hubert, C.; Debuisschert, C. F.; Maurin, I.; Nunzi, J. M.; Raimond, P. Adv.
Mater. 2002, 14, 729–732.
Tr-AZ-mNT Synthesis. This compound was synthesized
by the azo-coupling reaction between Tr-AN and diazonium salt
of 2-methyl-4-nitroaniline via similar method mentioned above.
Yield: 87%. DSC: Tg 109 °C. MS: MW 1108.42 (calcd 1108.15).
IR (KBr, cm-1): 3440 (O-H), 2918 (-CH2), 1693 (CdO), 1601,
1518 (benzene ring), 1338 (-NO2). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6),
δ (ppm): 2.64 (s, 9H), 3.14 (s, 9H), 3.41 (m, 3H), 3.70 (m, 3H),
3.80 (m, 3H), 3.96 (m, 3H), 4.17 (m, 3H), 5.20 (d, 3H), 6.86 (d,
6H), 7,59 (d, 3H), 7.79 (d, 6H), 8.06 (d, 3H), 8.32 (s, 3H). UV-vis
(DMF): 489 nm.
(23) Hubert, C.; Fiorini-Debuisschert, C.; Rocha, L.; Raimond, P.; Nunzi, J. M.
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2007, 24, 1839–1846.
(24) (a) Kandjani, S. A.; Barille, R.; Dabos-Seignon, S.; Nunzi, J. M.; Otryl, E.;
Kucharski, S. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2006, 466, 99–109. (b) Kandjani, S. A.; Barille,
R.; Dabos-Seignon, S.; Nunzi, J. M.; Otryl, E.; Kucharski, S. Opt. Lett. 2005, 30, 1986–
1988.
(25) (a) Shirota, Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2000, 10, 1–25. (b) Ishow, E.; Bellaïche, C.;
Bouteiller, L.; Nakatani, K.; Delaire, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15744–15745.
(c) Shirota, Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 75–93.
(26) Thelakkat, M. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2002, 287, 442–461.
(27) (a) Nakano, H.; Takahashi, T.; Kadota, T.; Shirota, Y. Adv. Mater. 2002,
14, 1157–1160. (b) Nakano, H.; Tanino, T.; Takahashi, T.; Ando, H.; Shirota, Y.
J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 242–246. (c) Ando, H.; Tanino, T.; Nakano, H.; Shirota, Y.
Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 113, 376–381.
(28) (a) Kim, M. J.; Seo, E. M.; Vak, D.; Kim, D. Y. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15,
4021–4027. (b) Chun, C.; Kim, M. J.; Vak, D.; Kim, D. Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13,
2904–2909.
Film Preparation. Solid films of the molecular azo glass with
smooth surfaces were prepared by spin-coating. The homoge-
neous solutions of the azo compounds were obtained by dissol-
ving a suitable amount of the solids in anhydrous N,N-
dimethylformamide (DMF). The solutions were filtered through
0.45 μm membranes and spin-coated onto glass slides. The film
thickness was controlled to be in a range from 200 to 400 nm by
adjusting the solution concentrations (in range from 7% to 10%
(29) Ishow, E.; Lebon, B.; He, Y. N.; Wang, X. G.; Bouteiller, L.; Galmiche, L.;
Nakatani, K. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1261–1267.
(30) He, Y. N.; Gu, X. Y.; Guo, M. C.; Wang, X. G. Opt. Mater. 2008, 31, 18–27.
ꢀ
(31) Ishow, E.; Camacho-Aguilera, R.; Guerin, J.; Brosseau, A.; Nakatani, K.
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 796–804.
6756 DOI: 10.1021/la9041056
Langmuir 2010, 26(9), 6755–6761