Angewandte
Chemie
Table 2: Influence of epoxide substitution on the 4-exo cyclization.
scopic, air-stable complex 5, was sufficient to compensate for
this effect.
Second, the protic conditions[9] usually employed for
mediating turn-over are not suitable for the preparation of 2.
These unsuitable conditions must be the result of the cationic
complexes, as the presence of amides and hydroxy groups is
generally not detrimental to [Cp2TiCl2] or alkyl-substituted
titanocenes as catalysts.[9] The combination of Me3SiCl and
collidine as introduced by Oltra and Cuerva[10] is suitable to
this end. In titanocene-catalyzed epoxide openings, this
reagent combination is superior to Me3SiCl,[11] which was
introduced by Fꢀrstner et al. in his seminal catalytic reac-
tions.[12] It appears that only the silylated product can be
displaced by the substrate from the template, because 2 is an
excellent ligand for the titanocenes.
Entry
Substrate/R
t [h]
Product [%]
d.r.[a]
1
2
3
4
5
6/Et
8/nPr
10/nBu
12/nOct
14/Cy
40
60
40
72
40
7/63
9/70
11/63
13/60
15/46
90:10
87:13
90:10
88:12
68:32
[a] Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Cy=cyclohexyl.
Third, the cyclization is completely diastereoselective at
temperatures ranging from 0 to 708C (refluxing THF). This is
remarkable in two respects. First, 4-exo cyclizations of
substrates similar to 1, without templated radical binding,
have been predicted to proceed without diastereoselectivi-
ty.[6k] For substrates identical to 1 but containing a gem-
dimethyl substitution, the cyclizations proceed with low
selectivity. Second, in contrast to typical radical cyclizations
the diastereoselectivity of our reaction is not temperature
dependent.
Scheme 4. Dependence of the templated 4-exo cyclization on amide
substitution.
The selectivity of our reactions can be explained by a two-
point binding of the radical intermediate (Scheme 3). The
templated cyclic radical will be more stable as conformer A,
leading to the trans product. Therefore, the transannular
cyclization should be diastereoselective over a wide temper-
ature range as indeed observed.
crystallography (see the Supporting Information for
details).[13] This structure supports our hypothesis of product
inhibition, because both the alcohol and the amide group are
ideally positioned to render the cyclobutanes excellent
bidentate ligands.
Finally, we turned our attention to alternative functional
groups for enforcing the two-point binding of the radical
intermediates (Scheme 5). Particularly interesting in this
respect are oxazolidinones and morpholine-derived amide,
because both can be additionally manipulated, for example,
through alkylation, or transformed into acids, alcohols,
ketones, or aldehydes[14] in a straightforward manner. Thus,
a large number of functionalized cyclobutanes can in principle
be accessed from the corresponding cyclization products.
Cyclobutane 21 can be obtained in 84% yield as an 89:11
mixture of separable diastereoisomers. Therefore, the use of
oxazolidinones for binding to the cationic catalyst is not only
possible but even results in higher yields of the corresponding
products relative to those obtained when the amides are used;
this is additionally corroborated by the results of 22 and 25.
Notably, for the latter two cases it was necessary to heat the
reaction mixture to reflux to ensure a high conversion into the
desired products 23 and 26. In these cases, the minor
cis isomers were obtained as the lactones 24 and 27. Finally,
both the pyrrolidinone derivative 28 and the morpholine-
derived amide 30 gave the desired cyclobutanes 29 and 31,
respectively. As expected, 31 was formed with complete
diastereoselectivity.
Scheme 3. Mechanistic rationale for the diastereoselectivity of the
templated 4-exo cyclization.
To investigate the general applicability of our concept and
to understand the relative importance of the steric interac-
tions for the diastereoselectivity of the cyclization, we
investigated substrates having different epoxide and amide
substitution (Table 2 and Scheme 4). The presence of n-alkyl
substituents at the epoxide (Table 2, entries 1–4) led to a
slightly decreased diastereoselectivity with the yield of the
products remaining almost unaffected. Introduction of the
bulkier cyclohexyl group results in a low-yielding and
unselective reaction (Table 2, entry 5).
Amide substitution does not appear to be critical
(Scheme 4) as both 17 and 19 are obtained in slightly lower
yields than 2 and with complete diastereoselectivity. The
relative configuration of trans-15 was proven by X-ray
In conclusion, we have devised a novel concept for the
realization of one of the most difficult radical cyclizations
based on the use of our cationic titanocene complexes.
Through binding of both the radical and radical acceptor to
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8882 –8885
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
8883