30
P. S. Fordred, S. D. Bull / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 27–31
Me
OH
Me
Me
Ph
OH
Ph
Ph
(3S,4R)-12a, 82% ee
O
O
O
O
B
H
Me
Ph
B
H
Me
Ph
MgSO4,
+
+
HO
OH
N
CDCl3, rt,
10 min
N
B
O
Me
H
H2N
Ph
91
18
:
9
16
(1.1 eq.)
17
19
(1.2 eq.)
Ratio determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopic analysis
Scheme 5. The ee of diol 12a was determined via 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of the dr of iminoboronate ester derivatives 18 and 19.
(a) (−)-IpcBH2 9 (2 eq.),
THF, -25 °C, 48 h;
Me
Me
18.3 mmol) was heated at reflux for 16 h. The crude reaction mixture was
Ph
CO2Me
Ph
CO2Me
cooled to rt, acidified to pH 1.0, extracted with Et2O (3 ꢂ 30 mL) and the
combined organic phases washed with NaCl(aq), dried (MgSO4) and the solvent
removed under reduced pressure. The resultant crude product was dissolved in
0.1 M aqueous NaOH solution, washed with Et2O (2 ꢂ 30 mL), acidified to pH
1.0 and the precipitated acid extracted with CH2Cl2 (4 ꢂ 30 mL). The combined
organic solvent was dried (MgSO4) and removed under reduced pressure to
afford the desired 4-arylpent-3-enoic acid 14. Step 2: 98% H2SO4 (0.5 equiv)
was added dropwise to a rapidly stirred solution of 4-arylpent-3-enoic acid 14
in MeOH (0.5 M), and the resulting solution stirred at rt for 16 h. The solution
was neutralised by the addition of solid NaHCO3 and the solvent evaporated
under reduced pressure. The crude product was partitioned between H2O and
CH2Cl2, the aqueous layer re-extracted with CH2Cl2, the combined organic
layers dried (MgSO4) and solvent removed under reduced pressure. The
resultant mixture of (E)/(Z)-isomers was purified via chromatography (petrol/
Et2O (9:1), SiO2) to afford the desired methyl (E)-4-arylpent-3-enoate 11.
10. Spectroscopic data for selected compounds: (a) Methyl (E)-4-phenylpent-3-
enoate 11a: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.21–7.44 (5H, m, ArH), 5.95 (1H, tq,
J = 7.1 and 1.4 Hz, C@CH), 3.72 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.27 (2H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, CH2), 2.05–
2.08 (3H, m, CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 172.4, 143.1, 138.1, 128.3, 127.1,
125.8, 119.2, 52.0, 34.3, 16.2; IR (neat): 1730 (C@O), 1160 (C–O) cmꢀ1; (b)
(b) Add MeOH at-25 °C;
(c) H2O2 ,NaHCO3, rt, 6 h
OH
20
11a
75% ee
Scheme 6. Hydroboration of b,
c
-ester 11a to afford (3S,4R)-b-hydroxy ester 20.
Me
Me
H
(−)-IpcBH2
OMe
Ph
Ipc
11a
Ph
OMe
B
O
B
O
H
Ipc
21
22
(3S,4R)-4-Phenylpentane-1,3-diol 12a: 82% ee; ½a D25
ꢁ
+6.4 (c 4.6, CHCl3); 1H
Me
Me
Ipc
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.21–7.38 (5H, m, ArH), 3.77–3.97 (3H, m, CH2(OH)
and CH(OH)), 2.79 (app. p, J = 7.0 Hz, CHCH3), 2.17 (2H, br s, 2 ꢂ OH), 1.82–1.95
(1H, m, CHAHB), 1.58–1.74 (1H, m, CHAHB), 1.28 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH3); 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 143.0, 128.8, 128.1, 126.9, 76.8, 61.9, 46.6, 35.6, 17.6;
IR (neat): 3350 (O–H) cmꢀ1; HRMS (ES): m/z [C11H16NaO2]+ requires 203.1043,
H2O2/
H
H
(−)-IpcBH2
Ph
NaHCO3
Ph
H
12a
B
O
B
O
Ipc
OMe
23
found 203.1052; (c) (2R,3S)-2-Phenylpentan-3-ol 15: 82% ee; ½a D25
ꢁ
+6.3 (c 1.6,
CHCl3), (lit.13
½
a 2D5
ꢁ
for (2S,3R)-15 = ꢀ11.4(neat)); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d
7.12–7.30 (5H, m, ArH), 3.52 (1H, ddd, J = 8.2, 7.1 and 3.5 Hz, CH(OH)), 2.69
(app. p, J = 7.1 Hz, CH3CH), 1.49–1.65 (1H, m, CHAHB), 1.44 (1H, br s, OH), 1.24-
1.38 (1H, m, CHAHB), 1.21 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, CHCH3), 0.92 (3H, t, J = 7.3 Hz,
CH2CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 143.6, 128.6, 128.2, 126.7, 77.4, 45.7,
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism for the tandem hydroboration/reduction of b,
unsaturated ester 11a.
c-
27.3, 18.0, 10.0; IR (neat): 3387 (O–H), 1602 cmꢀ1
; HRMS (ES): m/z
[C11H16NaO]+ requires 187.1099, found 187.1092; (d) Methyl (3S,4R)-3-
Acknowledgment
hydroxy-4-phenylpentanoate 20: 75% ee;
½
a 2D5
ꢁ
ꢀ11.7 (c 3.9, CHCl3); 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.13–7.30 (5H, m, ArH), 4.11 (1H, ddd, J = 9.4, 6.2 and
3.0 Hz, CH(OH)), 3.61 (3H, s, OCH3), 2.78 (1H, app. p, J = 7.0 Hz, CHCH3), 2.97
(1H, dd, J = 16.0 and 3.0 Hz, CHAHB), 2.29 (1H, dd, J = 16.0 and 9.6 Hz, CHAHB),
1.25 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d 173.4, 142.6, 128.5, 128.2,
P.S.F. gratefully acknowledges the EPSRC for the award of a
Ph.D. scholarship.
126.8, 72.3, 51.8, 45.2, 38.8, 17.2; IR (neat): 3657 (O–H), 1727 (C@O) cmꢀ1
HRMS (ES): m/z [C12H16NaO3]+ requires 231.0997, found 231.0999.
;
References and notes
11. General procedure for the asymmetric hydroboration/reduction of b,c-unsaturated
esters 11a–g: BF3.OEt2 (2.0 equiv, 5.26 mmol, 0.65 mL) was added dropwise to a
solution of 2IpcBH2.TMEDA16 (1.05 equiv, 2.76 mmol, 1.15 g) in dry THF
(3.8 mL). The resulting solution was stirred at rt for 3 h and then cooled to
ꢀ17 °C (MeOH/finely crushed ice). A solution of ester 11 (1.0 equiv, 2.63 mmol)
in THF (1.0 mL) was then added dropwise and the reaction mixture allowed to
warm to 0 °C overnight. The resultant solution was then treated with 30%
aqueous H2O2 (13.8 mL) and saturated NaHCO3 solution (84 mL), followed by
stirring at rt for 6 h. The reaction mixture was then extracted with Et2O, the
combined organics washed with water, dried (MgSO4) and the solvent
removed under reduced pressure to afford a crude product that was purified
via chromatography (petrol/Et2O (1:1), SiO2) to afford the desired 4-
arylpentane-1,3-diol 12.
1. Brown, H. C. Boranes in Organic Chemistry; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, New
York, 1972.
2. (a) Patra, P. K.; Nishide, K.; Fuji, K.; Node, M. Synthesis 2004, 1003–1006; (b)
Andrews, G. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 697–700.
3. Molander, G. A.; Bobbitt, K. L. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2676–2678.
4. Simila, S. T. M.; Reichelt, A.; Martin, S. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 2933–2936.
5. Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 500, 1–19.
6. (a) Mandal, A. K.; Jadhav, P. K.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3543–3544;
(b) Brown, H. C.; Yoon, N. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 5514–5516.
7. 2-Arylpropionaldehydes 13a–g were prepared from their corresponding
acetophenones via a two-step Wittig C1-homologation/enol ether hydrolysis
protocol, see: Pelphrey, P. M.; Popov, V. M.; Joska, T. M.; Beierlein, J. M.; Bolstad,
E. S. D.; Fillingham, Y. A.; Wright, D. L.; Anderson, A. C. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50,
940–950.
12. For a detailed discussion of how to determine the ee of diols using this
derivatisation method, see: (a) Kelly, A. M.; Pérez-Fuertes, Y.; Arimori, S.; Bull,
S. D.; James, T. D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1971–1974; (b) Kelly, A. M.; Pérez-Fuertes,
Y.; Fossey, J. S.; Yeste, S. L.; Bull, S. D.; James, T. D. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 215–219.
13. Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 2159–2165.
14. The ee of b-hydroxy-ester 20 was determined via reduction with LiAlH4 to
afford 1,3-diol 12a whose ee was then determined using the 1H NMR
derivatisation method described in Scheme 5.
8. (a) Garnier, J. M.; Robin, S.; Rousseau, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3281–3291; (b)
Kumar, H. M. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, E. J.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 2401–2404.
9. General procedure for the two-step synthesis of b,c-unsaturated esters 11a–g.
Step 1: A mixture of dry Et3N (1.5 equiv, 27.5 mmol, 3.9 mL), malonic acid
(1.0 equiv, 18.3 mmol, 1.90 g) and 2-aryl-propionaldehyde 13 (1.0 equiv,