LETTER
Triazine Scaffold for BNCT
1009
After the addition, the ice bath was removed and the mixture was al-
lowed to warm to r.t. for 15 min. A solution of 7a,b (0.14 mmol) in
dry MeCN (3.5 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was refluxed
overnight under argon, then cooled to r.t. and concentrated to 1 mL
volume. To this mixture H2O (5 mL) was added followed by 5%
HCl until pH 3 was reached. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2
(15 mL) and extracted. The organic layer was washed with H2O,
then dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated. The crude
product was purified flash chromatography (EtOAc–MeOH, 9:1),
furnishing 9a and 9b in 72% (91 mg) and 70% (124 mg) yields,
respectively.
the formation of the expected compounds 9a and 9b in
comparable yields with respect to the previous reaction. In
the 11B NMR spectra, compounds 8a,b and 9a,b showed
signals in the range d = –2 to –15 ppm,15 while no peaks
were observed in the range d = –30 to –40 ppm, diagnostic
for the nido-carborane.16 MALDI-TOF mass experiments
confirmed the presence of the intact carborane cage.
In conclusion, this paper describes a simple and effective
way to introduce a carborane, a sugar and a carboxylic
acid or an amino acid onto a triazine scaffold. Such com-
pounds open the possibility to generate easily a remark-
able diversity employing a combinatorial approach. It is in
fact possible to introduce various oligosaccharidic
structures as well as to use this class of derivatives for the
synthesis of biologically relevant peptides.
Acknowledgement
We thank MIUR (COFIN 2001), Università del Piemonte Orientale
and CNR for financial support.
Work is in progress to extend the scope of the procedure References
to more complex derivatives directly involved in tumor
cell surface recognition and endocytosis phenomena.
(1) Locher, G. L. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1936, 36, 1.
(2) For some general reviews see e.g.: (a) Bregadze, V. I.
Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 209. (b) Valliant, J. F.; Guenther, K.
J.; King, A. S.; Morel, P.; Schaffer, P.; Sogbei, O. O.;
Stephenson, K. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 232, 173.
(c) Yamamoto, Y. Pure Appl. Chem. 1991, 63, 423.
(d) Barth, R. F.; Soloway, A. H.; Fairchild, R. G. Cancer
Res. 1990, 50, 1061.
(3) (a) Soloway, A. H.; Tjarks, W.; Barnum, B. A.; Rong, F.-G.;
Barth, R. F.; Codogni, I. M.; Wilson, J. G. Chem. Rev. 1998,
98, 1515. (b) Hawthorne, M. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1993, 32, 950.
(4) (a) See ref. 3a. (b) Morin, C. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 12521.
(5) For general information on oligosaccharides synthesis and
carbohydrates biology see e.g.: (a) Seeberger, P. H.; Haase,
W.-C. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4349. (b) Nishimura, S. Curr.
Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 325. (c) Sears, P.; Wong, C.-H.
Science 2001, 291, 2344. (d) Dove, A. Nat. Biotechnol.
2001, 19, 913. (e) Barchi, J. J. Jr. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2000,
6, 485.
(6) Valliant, J. F.; Guenther, K. J.; King, A. S.; Morel, P.;
Schaffer, P.; Sogbei, O. O.; Stephenson, K. A. Coord. Chem.
Rev. 2002, 232, 173.
(7) (a) Thimon, C.; Panza, L.; Morin, C. Synlett 2003, 1399.
(b) Das, B. C.; Das, S.; Li, G.; Bao, W.; Kabalka, G. W.
Synlett 2001, 1419.
(8) (a) Gustafson, G. R.; Baldino, C. M.; O’Donnell, M.-M.;
Sheldon, A.; Tarsa, R. J.; Verni, C. J.; Coffen, D. L.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4051. (b) Xia, Y.; Mirzai, B.;
Chackalamannil, S.; Czarniecki, M.; Wang, S.; Clemmons,
A.; Ahn, H.; Boykow, G. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996,
6, 919. (c) Ichihara, K.; Naruta, Y. Chem. Lett. 1995, 631.
(9) Lee, C.-H.; Lim, H.-G.; Lee, J.-D.; Lee, Y.-J.; Ko, J.;
Nakamura, H.; Kang, S. O. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2003,
17, 539.
(10) (a) Maderna, A.; Herzog, A.; Knobler, C. B.; Hawtorne, M.
F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10423. (b) Lee, J.-D.; Lee,
Y.-J.; Jeong, H.-J.; Lee, J. S.; Lee, C.-H.; Ko, J.; Kang, S. O.
Organometallics 2003, 22, 445. (c) Malmquist, J.; Sjöberg,
S. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2534.
Preparation of Compound 3
Compound 1 (516 mg, 2.42 mmol) was dissolved in 35 mL of dry
THF. Catalytic hydrogenation (Pd/C, 20 mg) furnished compound
2 after 2.5 h. Disappearance of 1 was monitored by TLC (petroleum
ether/EtOAc 8:2). Hünig’s base (422 mL, 2.42 mmol) and cyanuric
chloride (1339 mg, 7.26 mmol) were added directly to the reaction
mixture at r.t. under nitrogen. After 14 h, the mixture was diluted
with THF, filtered over celite and the solvent evaporated. The resi-
due was purified by flash chromatography (petroleum ether–
EtOAc, 85:15) giving 690 mg of 3 as a white solid (85% yield).
General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 7a and
7b
(Z)-aminopropyl glycoside 5a or 5b (0.90 mmol) was dissolved in
dry THF (25 mL) A catalytic amount of Pd on activated charcoal
was added and the amino group was deprotected under hydrogen at-
mosphere (3 h). The mixture containing the free amine 6a (or 6b re-
spectively) was transferred into a solution of 3 (300 mg, 0.90 mmol)
and Hünig’s base (156 mL, 0.90 mmol) in THF (15 mL) at 0 °C. The
mixture was allowed to warm to r.t. and stirred overnight, then di-
luted with THF and filtered over celite. The solvent was evaporated
and the brown solid purified by flash chromatography (petroleum
ether–EtOAc, 1:1 for 7a and 3:7 for 7b). Compound 7a and 7b were
obtained as white solids in 88% (554 mg) and 60% (533 mg, not op-
timised) yields, respectively.
General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 8a and
8b
95% NaH (7 mg, 0.28 mmol) was added to a solution of methyl
thioglycolate (27 mL, 0.28 mmol) in 2 mL of dry MeCN in an ice
bath. After the addition, the ice bath was removed and the mixture
was allowed to warm to r.t. for 15 min. A solution of 7a,b (0.14
mmol) in dry MeCN (3 mL) was added. The resulting mixture was
refluxed overnight under argon, then diluted with CH2Cl2 and H2O
and extracted. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered
and concentrated. The crude product was purified flash chromatog-
raphy (petroleum ether–EtOAc, 1:1 for 8a and 4:7 for 8b), giving
8a and 8b in 75% (82 mg) and 71% (76 mg) yields, respectively.
(11) Wilson, J. G.; Anisuzzaman, A. K. M.; Alam, F.; Soloway,
A. H. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 1955.
(12) It is well known that the presence of the carboranyl moiety
has a strong electron withdrawing effect, which induces a
deactivation of the amine nucleofilicity. See e.g.: Oliva, J.
M.; Viñas, C. J. Mol. Struct. 2000, 556, 33; and references
cited therein.
General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 9a and
9b
95% NaH (15 mg, 0.57 mmol) was added to a solution of N-Boc-
cysteine (63 mg, 0.28 mmol) in 2 mL of dry MeCN in an ice bath.
Synlett 2004, No. 6, 1007–1010 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York