Scheme 3
.
One-Pot Synthesis Attempts to Prepare acacH
BODIPYs
Scheme 5. Molecular Formulas of BODIPYs Derivatives 14-16
2b). The fluorescence spectra showed relatively good mirror
symmetry with respect to the lowest-energy absorption
transitions, confirming that the same optical transitions are
involved in both absorption and emission processes. These
transitions were weakly polarized, as is typical for S1
emitters. Furthermore, the fluorescence decay profiles fitted
a single exponential, with fluorescence lifetimes in the 3-15
ns range. The fact that the radiative rate constant (about 1
× 108 s-1) is much greater than the nonradiative rate constant
(about 5 × 107 s-1) shows that the molecular excited state
preferentially deactivates radiatively. The small Stokes shift
observed may be explained by the substantial invariance of
the molecular geometric structure in the ground (S0) and the
first excited (S1) states, while the perfect match between the
excitation and absorption spectra points to the efficient
radiative deactivation of the excited electronic state.
Thus, an alternative strategy investigated was the substitution
of the iodo group in 4 with acetylene (used to degass the reaction
mixture), followed by a one-pot cross-coupling reaction with
iodophenyl-BODIPY dyes after removing all residual acetylene
from the reaction mixture. Dyes 6 and 10 with an acetylenic
linker were successfully isolated in good yields by this one-pot
protocol (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4. Synthesis of the acacH BODIPYs 6 and 10
Finally, after some experimentation, we succeeded in linking
in a covalent fashion dyes 2 (orange), 10 (blue), and 7 (green)
to TiO2 powder (Degussa, P-25). By mixing a dichloromethane
solution of the dye with TiO2 dispersed in a small volume of
isopropanol at 60 °C, the powder progressively took on the color
of the solution. After 2 h, the color of the solution had
diminished in intensity by about 50%. After vigorous washing
of the colored powder under sonication, the dried samples were
orange, blue, and green, demonstrating efficient linking of the
BODIPY dyes (Figure 3). Treatment of TiO2 powders with dyes
carrying an iodo function in place of the acacH fragment does
not provide colored powders, excluding possible adsorption of
the dyes on the particle surface (Figure 3, left-hand side). FT-
IR spectra of the powders were also in keeping with complex-
ation of 1,3-diketonate units to Ti centers, with a carbonyl region
absorption (νacac ) 1599 cm-1) very close to that of soluble
Ti-acac complexes (Figure 4) but absent in genuine TiO2.17 It
is well established that grafting dyes to inorganic surfaces by
pincer type of anchors is more efficient than single tethers like
carboxylates or phosphonates. The binding energies of acac
In extension of this one-pot reaction, we performed more
sophisticated syntheses in which two sites were functionalized
(Scheme 5). While the ethynyl derivatives of dyes 11-13 are
too unstable to be used in coupling reactions to 4, the procedure
defined in Scheme 4 enabled isolation of compounds 14-16
in appreciable yields.
The absorption spectra of 14-16 in dilute dichloromethane
solutions showed two main absorption peaks. That at 300 nm
is common to the whole series, while the lower-energy
absorption varies with the BODIPY core (Figure 2a). The
absorption bands located at higher energies are assigned to
π-π* transitions localized on the acacH fragment, and its
intensity is proportional to the number of units. The absorption
bands localized at 515, 643, and 709 nm, respectively, for 14,
15, and 16 are safely assigned, in light of previous data, to
S0fS1 transitions.13–15 Interestingly, the weak absorption in
the 360-400 nm range, probably due to S0fS2 transitions,
showed, in contrast, only a weak dependence on an increase
in the core delocalization of the BODIPY unit. Excitation
in the low-energy absorption bands of 14, 15, and 16 led to
strong emissions at 533, 672, and 749 nm, respectively, with
quantum yields in the range 50-70% (Table 1 and Figure
(13) Ulrich, G.; Ziessel, R.; Harriman, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2008,
47, 1184–1201. Loudet, A.; Burgess, K. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 4891–4932.
(14) Yu, Y.-H.; Descalzo, A. B.; Shen, Z.; Ro¨hr, H.; Liu, Q.; Wang,
Y.-W.; Spieles, M.; Li, Y.-Z.; Rurack, K.; You, X.-Z. Chem. Asian J. 2006,
1-2, 176. Erlen-Ela, S.; Yilmaz, M. D.; Icli, B.; Dede, Y.; Icli, S.; Akkaya,
E. U. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3299–3302.
(15) Qin, W.; Rohand, T.; Dehaen, W.; Clifford, Driesen, K.; Beljonne,
D.; Van Averbeke, M.; Boens, N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 8588–8597.
(16) Olmsted, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 2581–0000.
(17) Cox, M.; Lewis, J.; Nyholm, R. S. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 2840–
2844.
410
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010