380
M. Jean et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 378–381
Table 4
Competitive reaction
10 mol% PPh3AuCl
10 mol% AgOTf
1e + Ph(CH2)2SH + Ph(CH2)2OH
3e + Ph(CH2)2SBn + Ph(CH2)2OBn
ClCH2CH2Cl
15 h, 80 °C
2e
2f
4e
4x
Entry
1e (equiv)
2e (equiv)
2f (equiv)
Yield (4e) (%)
Yield (4x) (%)
1
2
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
1.0
0
1.0
1.0
75
—
51
—
70
26
reaction conditions faster than its reaction with 2a. The SN1 mech-
anism was also consolidated when the thiophenol 2a was treated
with the esters 1i and 1j. In each case the carbocationic secondary
alkyl group, generated from the species A, rearranges in a more sta-
ble tertiary carbocation before its reaction with 2a to afford 4v and
4w in good yields (55 and 82%, respectively, entries 18–19) (Fig. 1).
A competitive reaction was also conducted to determine the
chemoselectivity between the alkylation of an alcohol and a thiol.
The o-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl]benzoic acid benzyl ester 1e
was placed with 1.0 equiv phenethyl alcohol 2f and 1.0 equiv
phenethyl thiol 2e in the presence of the gold/silver catalytic sys-
tem (Table 4). While the reaction of benzylation of the alcohol 2f
gave similar yield as the reaction with the thiol 2e, surprisingly
we obtained the thioether 4e as a major product in the competitive
reaction, 4e being isolated with 51% yield and the ether 4x with
26% yield (entry 3).13 In a similar manner, a competitive reaction
was realized between phenol and thiophenol. Only the benzylation
of the thiophenol was observed. However after a control experi-
ment we noticed the absence of reactivity of phenol in these reac-
tion conditions.
On the one hand the use of the disulfide allows the obtaining of
the thioether and on the other hand it leads to a functionalized iso-
coumarin. This last point could be later used to prepare new func-
tionalized isocoumarin derivatives.15
In conclusion, we have described a gold-catalyzed C–S bond for-
mation from various thiols. The reaction proceeded with PPh3AuCl
in combination with AgOTf as a catalytic system in 1,2-dichloro-
ethane at 80 °C via an activation of leaving group. This procedure
was shown to furnish arylalkyl sulfides in good to high yields but
afforded dialkyl sulfides in low yields. Further investigations of
the scope as well as synthetic applications are currently in progress
and will be reported in due course.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Université de Rennes 1, the
Région Bretagne and Rennes Metropole. One of us, Professor Naoki
Asao, thanks the Université de Rennes 1 for financial support dur-
ing his stay as visiting professor at the Université de Rennes 1.2
We were also curious to see if our methodology could be
extended to disulfides as synthetic equivalents of thiols.14 The
o-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl] benzoic acid benzyl ester 1e and
diphenyl disulfide 2k were treated with 5 mol % PPh3AuCl and
5 mol % AgOTf in 1,2-dichloroethane at 80 °C for 15 h, the expected
thioether 4a was isolated in a satisfactory yield (Scheme 4). Besides
4a, a mixture of the usual isocoumarin 3e and a functionalized iso-
coumarin 3i was obtained in 2:3 ratio, 3i being isolated in 48% yield.
A heterolytic cleavage of the disulfide 2k occurred probably, one
moiety acting as a nucleophile to afford 4a and the second moiety
playing the role of an electrophile to cleave the gold-carbon bond
in the intermediate A (Scheme 2). This result appears interesting.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Selected recent reviews, see: (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Gridnev, I. D.; Patil, N. T.; Jin, T.
Chem. Commun. 2009, 5075–5087; (b) Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. Rev.
2008, 108, 3239–3265; (c) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3180–3211;
(d) Jiménez-Núñez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 333–346; (e)
Fürstner, A.; Davies, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3410–3449.
2. (a) Mase, T.; Itoh, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 2008, 80, 707–715; (b) Norris, T.; Leeman,
K. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 869–878; (c) Dahl, T.; Tornoe, C. W.; Bang-
Andersen, B.; Nielsen, P.; Jorgensen, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1726–
1728.
PhS
Me
Me
PhS
Ph
3. Kondo, T.; Mitsudo, T. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3205–3220.
4. See for representative papers: (a) Kosugi, M.; Ogata, T.; Terada, M.; Sano, H.;
Migita, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 3657–3658; (b) Murata, M.; Buchwald,
S. L. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7397–7403; (c) Moreau, X.; Campagne, J.-M.; Meyer,
G.; Jutand, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 3749–3760; (d) Eichman, C. C.; Stambuli, J.
P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4005–4008; (e) Alvaro, E.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 7858–7868. and references cited therein.
Me Me
Ph
4w
4v
Figure 1. Structures of 4v and 4w.
5. (a) Cristau, H. J.; Chabaud, B.; Chene, A.; Christol, H. Synthesis 1981, 892–894;
(b) Percec, V.; Bae, J.-Y.; Hill, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 6895–6903; (c) Jammi,
S.; Barua, P.; Rout, L.; Saha, P.; Punniyamurthy, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
1484–1487.
6. Selected recent papers, see: (a) Kabir, M. S.; Van Linn, M. L.; Monte, A.; Cook, J.
M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3363–3366; (b) Xu, H.-J.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Deng, J.; Fu, Y.;
Feng, Y.-S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 434–437; (c) She, J.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 593–596; (d) Bagley, M. C.; Dix, M. C.; Fusillo, V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3661–3664.
O
5 mol% PPh3AuCl
5 mol% AgOTf
O
1e + PhS-SPh
3e +
+
4a
ClCH2CH2Cl
15 h, 80 °C
64%
2k
3i
3e : 3i = 2 : 3
SPh
OMe
1.1 equiv 1.1 equiv
7. (a) Reddy, V. P.; Swapna, K.; Kumar, A. V.; Rao, K. R. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
3189–3191; (b) Reddy, V. P.; Kumar, A. V.; Swapna, K.; Rao, K. R. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 1697–1700.
Scheme 4. Thioether formation from diphenyl disulfide 2k.