domains has been observed with increasing IEC, which in turn
leads to significant variation in transport properties. Membranes
with relatively low IECs exhibit extremely low methanol
permeability, which are ascribed to a large portion of tightly
bound water and small sized ionic aggregates. Membranes II and
III exhibit unparalleled electrochemical selectivities that are two
orders of magnitude higher than Nafion, while maintaining
sufficient proton conductivity (i.e. > 0.02 S mꢀ1). The lower
methanol crossover of the cross-linked membranes has also been
demonstrated in the preliminary membrane-electrode assembly
(MEA) studies. The open circuit voltages of membranes II and
ꢁ
III under 3 M methanol/air conditions at 50 C were found in
a range of 0.75 to 0.85 V, which is much greater than that of
Nafion 117 (ꢂ0.65 V).
Acknowledgements
Fig. 6 Electrochemical selectivity of the cross-linked membranes and
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
(CBET-0932740).
Nafion 117.
(Fig. 5b), follows the same trend with Ea,s. Higher values of
Ea,methanol reiterate elevated barriers to methanol transport in the
cross-linked membranes when compared to Nafion. Consider-
able changes in methanol permeability upon IEC is presumably
associated with significant variation in the water state and
domain structure. Expanded ionic channels and the increased
portion of unbound and weakly bound water give rise to greater
methanol diffusion across the membrane.
References
1 F. Barbir, PEM Fuel Cells: Theory and Practice, Academic Press,
New York, 2005.
2 B. Gurau and E. S. Smotkin, J. Power Sources, 2002, 112, 339.
3 A. Heinzel and V. M. Barragan, J. Power Sources, 1999, 84, 70.
4 A. A. Kulikovsky, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 152, A1121.
5 S. Kang, S. J. Lee and H. Chang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, 154,
B1179.
6 J. T. Wang, S. Wasmus and R. F. Savinell, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996,
143, 1233.
7 N. W. Deluca and Y. A. Elabd, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys.,
2006, 44, 2201.
8 R. Dillon, S. Srinivasan, A. S. Arico and V. Antonucci, J. Power
Sources, 2004, 127, 112.
9 M. Sankir, Y. S. Kim, B. S. Pivovar and J. E. McGrath, J. Membr.
Sci., 2007, 299, 8.
10 V. S. Silva, B. Ruffmann, S. Vetter, M. Boaventura,
A. M. Mendes, L. M. Madeira and S. P. Nunes, Electrochim.
Acta, 2006, 51, 3699.
11 K. Xu, C. Chanthad, M. R. Gadinski, M. A. Hickner and Q. Wang,
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2009, 1, 2573.
12 D. J. Jones and J. Roziere, Adv. Res. Polym. Sci., 2008, 215, 219.
13 G. Alberti and M. Casciola, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2003, 33, 129.
14 J. A. Kerres, Fuel Cells, 2005, 5, 230.
15 C. W. Lin, Y. F. Huang and A. M. Kannan, J. Power Sources, 2007,
171, 340.
To evaluate the potential of the prepared membranes for
DMFCs, the electrochemical selectivity is computed and plotted
versus IEC as shown in Fig. 6. Encouragingly, the cross-linked
membranes have shown very high selectivity in transport of
protons over methanol. The reduced methanol permeability
significantly outweighs the decrease in ionic conductivity in the
cross-linked membranes. More impressively, the electrochemical
selectivities of the membranes II and III are 1.2 ꢃ 107 and 9.2 ꢃ
105, respectively, which are 288 and 22 times respectively higher
than that of Nafion (i.e. 4.2 ꢃ 104) while maintaining high proton
conductivities (> 0.02 S cmꢀ1). To the best of our knowledge, this
is the highest electrochemical selectivity reported from PEMs
with proton conductivities higher than 0.01 S cmꢀ1 7
The
.
exceptional selectivity obtained in the cross-linked membranes
may be attributed to the unique interplay of a high fraction of
strongly-bound water, small-sized transport channels, and the
superior acidity of perfluorosulfonic acid groups.
16 R. Wycisk, J. Chisholm, J. Lee, J. Lin and P. N. Pintauro, J. Power
Sources, 2006, 163, 9.
17 J. Wootthikanokkhan and N. Seeponkai, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2006,
102, 5941.
18 N. W. DeLuca and Y. A. Elabd, J. Power Sources, 2006, 163, 386.
19 K. Miyatake, H. Zhou and M. Watanabe, Macromolecules, 2004, 37,
4956.
20 M. Rikukawa and K. Sanui, J. Membr. Sci., 2004, 233, 93.
21 B. Bae, H. Y. Ha and D. Kim, J. Membr. Sci., 2006, 276, 51.
22 L. Sauguet, B. Ameduri and B. Boutevin, J. Polym. Sci., Part A:
Polym. Chem., 2006, 44, 4566.
23 S. J. Atkinson, V. E. Ellis, S. E. Boyd and C. L. Brown, New J. Chem.,
2007, 31, 155.
24 B. Boutevin, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2000, 38, 3235.
25 K. Li, S. Liang, Y. Lu and Q. Wang, Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 4121.
26 K. Xu, K. Li, P. Khanchaitit and Q. Wang, Chem. Mater., 2007, 19,
5937.
Conclusions
A series of P(VDF-PFSVE) with amino end-groups and varied
contents of perfluorosulfonic acids have been prepared and
fabricated into cross-linked membranes after curing with a trii-
socyanate agent. The formation of cross-linked structures
restricts the size of the hydrophilic domains, limits water sorption
and yields a high content of tightly bound absorbed water.
Membrane properties including water uptake, the state of
absorbed water and morphological structure have been found to
be strongly related to IEC. Sharp growth in the fraction of
loosely bound and unbound water and the size of the ionic
27 J. Guiot, B. Ameduri and B. Boutevin, Macromolecules, 2002, 35,
8694.
28 K. Xu, K. Li, C. S. Ewing, M. A. Hickner and Q. Wang,
Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 1692.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 6291–6298 | 6297