A R T I C L E S
Ruff et al.
sion, or cell-cell recognition.19-21 These recognition processes
involve in particular carbohydrate-protein interactions. As the
interaction of a single saccharide with its receptor is generally
weak, biology uses multivalency to enhance the binding
efficiency.22 The oligosaccharides involved in recognition
processes are generally clustered, displayed in a multivalent
fashion, at the surface of cells or bacteria.23 It is therefore of
much interest to design synthetic analogues of these natural
multivalent assemblies to mimic, or even improve over, their
native properties.24
One possible approach consists of conjugating carbohydrate
residues to a polymerizable scaffold.25 Glycoclusters have been
obtained by appending saccharide residues to branched26 or
hyperbranched polymers,27 ꢀ-cyclodextrin,28,29 and calixarene
cores.30 Other approaches involve, for instance, combinatorial
glycosamino acids31 and oligosaccharide32 derivatives, dynamic
monolayers,33 a polyrotaxane,34,35 and self-assembling glyco-
dendrimers.36
Extending our work on dynamers6,7 to the biopolymer
area,16-18 we were interested in designing dynamic analogues
of glycopolymers, glycodynamers. Such dynamic or equilibrium
polymers could provide, in addition to potential biorecognition
properties, an adaptive character that would enable them to
reorganize their sequence or constitution so as to select the
preferential/optimal sequence, nature, and proportion of the
bioactive monomeric subunits, in response to external physical
stimuli or chemical effectors (temperature, pH, etc.) or to the
presence of a (bio)chemical target template.
Figure 1. Molecular structures of the bis-hydrazides 1a,b and of the
dialdehydes 2a,b and 3.
the preparation of dynamic analogues of oligoarabinofura-
noses,17 multiple saccharide presentation,37-39 and in glycob-
lotting.40
Polymers incorporating carbohydrate-based monomers have
been obtained by poly(acylhydrazone)41,42 and polyoxime43
formation. Ditopic saccharide monomers yield reversible poly-
mers with a bis-boronic acid,15 and a dynamic library of cyclic
sugar oligomers has been generated via acylhydrazone forma-
tion.44
Such biodynamers may be of three types: (1) main chain,
resulting from polycondensation of saccharide residues through
reversible reactions; (2) side chain, where the saccharide residues
are either (a) appended on a dynamic main chain or (b)
reversibly grafted on a nondynamic main chain; and (3) “doubly
dynamic”, incorporating both main-chain and side-chain dynamics.
We present here our results on the generation of glycody-
namers of type (2)(a) (vide supra), that is, a nonglycosydic
dynamic main chain bearing lateral carbohydrate residues. We
also report their remarkable physical and optical properties, the
dynamic modulation of the latter, as well as their constitution-
dependent binding to a lectin.
Of special interest, as reversible condensation reaction, is the
formation of an imine-type double bond from an amino group
and a carbonyl group. Thus, oxime formation has been used in
(19) Dube, D. H.; Bertozzi, C. R. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2005, 4, 477–
488.
Molecular Design of the Monomers
(20) Shriver, Z.; Raguram, S.; Sasisekharan, R. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery
2004, 3, 863–873.
The monomers 1-3 were chosen so as to contain structurally
diverse aromatic cores to ensure a wide range of properties for
the different monomer combinations, allowing one to follow
the polymer compositions by various spectroscopic methods
such as NMR, UV, or fluorescence spectroscopy.
The starting monomers consist of aromatic bis-hydrazide 1a,
1b, and dialdehyde 2a, 2b, decorated by oligosaccharide groups
(21) Rudd, P. M.; Elliott, T.; Cresswell, P.; Wilson, I. A.; Dwek, R. A.
Science 2001, 291, 2370–2376.
(22) Mathai Mammen, S.-K. C.; George Whitesides, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2754–2794.
(23) Lundquist, J. J.; Toone, E. J. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 555–578.
(24) Houseman, B.; Mrksich, M. Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218, 1–44.
(25) Ladmiral, V.; Melia, E.; Haddleton, D. M. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40,
431–449.
(26) Narumi, A.; Kakuchi, T. Polym. J. 2008, 40, 383–397.
(27) Papp, I.; Dernedde, J.; Enders, S.; Haag, R. Chem. Commun. 2008,
5851–5853.
(37) Renaudet, O.; Dumy, P. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 243–246.
(38) Singh, Y.; Renaudet, O.; Defrancq, E.; Dumy, P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
1359–1362.
(28) Smiljanic, N.; Moreau, V.; Yockot, D.; Garc´ıa Ferna´ndez, J.; Djeda¨ıni-
Pilard, F. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2007, 57, 9–14.
(29) Fulton, D. A.; Stoddart, J. F. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1113–1116.
(30) Aoyama, Y. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 588–593.
(31) Schweizer, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 230–253.
(32) Yamago, S.; Yamada, T.; Ito, H.; Hara, O.; Mino, Y.; Yoshida, J.-i.
Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6159–6174.
(39) Renaudet, O.; Dumy, P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2628–2636.
(40) Shimaoka, H.; Kuramoto, H.; Furukawa, J.-i.; Miura, Y.; Kurogochi,
M.; Kita, Y.; Hinou, H.; Shinohara, Y.; Nishimura, S.-I. Chem.-Eur.
J. 2007, 13, 1664–1673.
(41) Roberts, G. A. F.; Thomas, I. M. Makromol. Chem. 1981, 182, 2611–
2617.
(33) Yeo, W.-S.; Yousaf, M. N.; Mrksich, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 14994–14995.
(42) Kirker, K. R.; Luo, Y.; Nielson, J. H.; Shelby, J.; Prestwich, G. D.
Biomaterials 2002, 23, 3661–3671.
(34) Nelson, A.; Stoddart, J. F. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3783–3786.
(35) Nelson, A.; Belitsky, J. M.; Vidal, S.; Joiner, C. S.; Baum, L. G.;
Stoddart, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11914–11922.
(36) Thoma, G.; Streiff, M. B.; Katopodis, A. G.; Duthaler, R. O.; Voelcker,
N. H.; Ehrhardt, C.; Masson, C. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 99–117.
(43) Andreana, P. R.; Xie, W.; Cheng, H. N.; Qiao, L.; Murphy, D. J.; Gu,
Q.-M.; Wang, P. G. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1863–1866.
(44) Bornaghi, L. F.; Wilkinson, B. L.; Kiefel, M. J.; Poulsen, S.-A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 9281–9284.
9
2574 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 8, 2010