lar Pauson-Khand reaction (PKR) of enynes leading to the
construction of bicyclo[m.3.0] skeletons (m ) 3, 4),4 but also
the Rh(I)-catalyzed intramolecular Pauson-Khand type
reaction of allene-alkyne substrates5 and bis(allene)s6 which
successfully provided the larger-sized bicyclo[m.3.0] frame-
works (m ) 4, 5, 6). Thus, the Pauson-Khand (type)
reactions unambiguously emerged as a powerful tool for
constructing bicyclo[m.3.0] structures (m ) 3-6). We now
report the novel synthesis of (+)-nakadomarin A by taking
advantage of the carbonylative [2+2+1] cycloaddition of
the enyne derivative, which provides the central tricyclic
framework (rings A, B, and D) in one operation. Our simple
retrosynthetic analysis of (+)-nakadomarin A (1) is depicted
in Scheme 1. The primary target molecule would be assumed
simpler enyne derivative 4b, which has a 2-benzyloxyethyl
group at the triple bond terminus (Table 1, entry 2). Although
Table 1. Pauson-Khand Reaction of 4
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of (+)-Nakadomarin A
a This result was reported by Magnus. See ref 3d.
4b was exposed to various Pauson-Khand conditions,
unexpectedly, no desired ring-closed products could be
obtained. This observation is in sharp contrast to the result
reported by Magnus,3d in which the intramolecular PKR of
the much simpler enyne analogue 4a (without a substituent
at the triple bond terminus) produced the carbonylative
[2+2+1] cycloaddition product 5a in 69% yield (entry 1).
We tentatively assumed that if a suitable π-electron donating
component, such as an olefin, is present at the proper position
to the alkyne-Co2(CO)6 complex moiety, it might anchi-
merically not only assist in the liberation of CO from the
cobalt atom, but also accelerate the coordination of an
internal olefin counterpart with the cobalt atom thus ending
up with a favorable result.7 Thus, an additional substrate 4c
having a vinyl group at the triple bond terminus was
prepared. Compound 4c was then treated with Co2(CO)8 to
afford the corresponding Co2(CO)6 complex, which was
subsequently exposed to several Pauson-Khand conditions,
and we found that the most standard condition, namely
heating in toluene at 110 °C under a CO atmosphere, effected
the ring-closing step to produce the desired product 5c in
52% yield (entry 3).
With the fact that the introduction of the vinyl group to
the triple bond terminus provided the favorable result in the
PKR of the alkyne-dihydropyrrole substrate in mind, the
synthesis of (+)-nakadomarin A was initiated according to
the protocol shown in Scheme 2. By taking the construction
of both the furan and 15-membered rings at the latter stages
into account, the homopropargyl amine 7 possessing a
pentenyl residue at the triple bond terminus was prepared
as follows. The Sonogashira coupling of the known vinylio-
to be the 6-5-5-5 tetracyclic compound 2, because the
compounds similar to 2 have already been transformed into
(+)-nakadomarin A2a,c by the two ring-closing olefin met-
atheses. The key synthetic intermediate, a tetracyclic com-
pound 2, might be assembled from the carbonylative
[2+2+1] cycloaddition product 3 via the furan ring formation
by taking advantage of the proper carbon tether (R5) at the
position R to the carbonyl functionality of 3. Therefore, our
tactical feature involves the PKR of the enyne derivative 4
as the most significant step in the synthesis of (+)-
nakadomarin A (1).
Prior to examining the PKR of 4 with suitable substituents,
we initially investigated the ring-closing reaction using a
(4) (a) Mukai, C.; Kobayashi, M.; Kim, I. J.; Hanaoka, M. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 5225–5230. (b) Nomura, I.; Mukai, C. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4301–
4304. (c) Nomura, I.; Mukai, C. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1803–1812. (d)
Kozaka, T.; Miyakoshi, N.; Mukai, C. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 10147–
10154.
(5) (a) Mukai, C.; Nomura, I.; Yamanishi, K.; Hanaoka, M. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 1755–1758. (b) Mukai, C.; Nomura, I.; Kitagaki, S. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 1376–1385. (c) Mukai, C.; Inagaki, F.; Yoshida, T.; Kitagaki, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4117–4121. (d) Mukai, C.; Inagaki, F.; Yoshida,
T.; Yoshitani, K.; Hara, Y.; Kitagaki, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7159–
7171. (e) Mukai, C.; Hirose, T.; Teramoto, S.; Kitagaki, S. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 10983–10994. (f) Inagaki, F.; Kawamura, T.; Mukai, C.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 5154–5160.
(7) (a) Krafft, M. E.; Scott, I. L.; Romero, R. H.; Feibelmann, S.; Van
Pelt, C. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7199–7207. (b) Wender, P. A.;
Croatt, M. P.; Deschamps, N. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5948–
5949. (c) Croatt, M. P.; Wender, P. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 19–32.
(d) Brusey, S. A.; Banide, E. V.; Do¨rrich, S.; O’Donohue, P.; Ortin, Y.;
Mu¨ller-Bunz, H.; Long, C.; Evans, P.; McGlinchey, M. J. Organometallics
2009, 28, 6308–6319.
(6) Inagaki, F.; Narita, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Kitagaki, S.; Mukai, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2007–2011.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1801