3058 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2010
Camargo et al.
In this paper, we present the synthesis of the new 2-[N-bis-(2-
pyridylmethyl)aminomethyl]-4-methyl-6-[N-bis(2-hydroxy-2-
oxoethyl)aminomethyl]phenol ligand (H3L) and the synthe-
sis and structure of its trinuclear [Gd3L2(NO3)2(H2O)4]-
Ligand 3 (2.65 mmol; 1.30 g) was dissolved in 40 mL of
methanol, and then KOH (18.52 mmol; 1.04 g) was added. This
mixture was stirred for 4 days at room temperature. The
resultant solution was dried under vacuum. The residual solid
obtained was dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water solution and
neutralized with HCl (4 mol L-1) to pH 7. Subsequent chroma-
tographic purification with basic DOWEX (1 ꢀ 2:200) eluted
with acetic acid led to H3L. Yield: 90%. Selected IR data (KBr):
ν (O-H, C-HAr and C-HAliph) 3551-2924; ν (CdC and CdN)
NO3 8H2O (1) complex, which displays high activity toward
3
the hydrolysis of the activated substrate 2,4-bis(dinitro-
phenyl)phosphate (BDNPP). Complex 1 was found to be
active toward the hydrolytic cleavage of plasmid DNA,
interacting with regio-specificity, indicating its potential ac-
tion as a chemical nuclease.
1600-1430; ν (COO-) 1631 and 1398; δ (C-HAr) 764 in cm-1
.
1H NMR δH (400 MHz; D2O): 1.85 (s, 3 H, CH3-residue of
CH3COOH); 1.98 (s, 3 H, CH3); 3.54 (s, 4 H, CH2); 3.72 (s, 2H,
CH2); 4.01 (4H, s, CH2); 4.09 (2H, s, CH2); 6.82 (2H, d, CHAr);
7.39 (4H, d, CHAr); 7.87 (2H, t, CHAr); 8.41 (2H, d, CHAr) in
ppm. 13C NMR δ (100 MHz; D2O): 19.27; 21.05; 55.63; 56.24;
56.86; 57.74; 116.94; 122.64; 124.96; 125.97; 130.56; 133.19;
133.94; 142.48; 144.90; 152.75; 153.24; 170.39; 177.71 (residue
of CH3COOH) in ppm.
Experimental Section
Abbreviations. The following abbreviations are used in this
paper: H3L, 2-[N-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)aminomethyl]-4-methyl-
6-[N-bis(2-hydroxy-2-oxoethyl)aminomethyl]phenol; HPTA,
1,3-diamino-2-hydroxypropane-N,N,N0,N0-tetraacetate; BDNPP,
2,4-bis(dinitrophenyl)phosphate; DNPP, 2,4-dinitrophenyl phos-
phate; DNP, 2,4-dinitrophenolate; ESI-MS, electrospray ioniza-
tion-mass spectrometry; BTP, 1,3-bis[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-
amino]propane; bp, base pairs; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
Materials and Measurements. BDNPP and ligand 2 were
synthesized by previously described methods.12-14 All other
chemicals and solvents were of analytical or spectroscopic grade
purchased from commercial sources, and used without further
purification. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer
model 16PC spectrometer, in KBr pellets in the 4000-400 cm-1
range. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a
Varian Mercury Plus 400 spectrometer (400 and 100 MHz,
respectively) in CDCl3 or D2O and using tetramethylsilane
(TMS, δ = 0.00 ppm) as the internal standard. Elemental
analysis was performed on a Carlo Erba E-1110 instrument.
The mass spectrometry (MS) experiments were carried out using
a Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Micromass, Manchester, U.K.)
and electrospray ionization in the positive mode (ESI(þ)-MS).
Typical MS conditions were as follows: source temperature of
100 °C, desolvation temperature of 100 °C, capillary voltage of 3
kV, and cone voltage of 50 V. The sample was injected using a
syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus) at a flow rate of 5 μL/min.
Mass spectra were acquired within the range of 50-2000 m/z.
Preparation of 2-[N-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)aminomethyl]-4-
methyl-6-[N-bis(2-methoxy-2-oxoethyl)aminomethyl]phenol (3).
Ligand 213,14 (0.01 mol; 4.21 g), dimethyl iminodiacetate (0.01
mol; 1.68 g), and triethylamine (0.02 mol; 2.90 mL) were
dissolved in 100 mL of dichloromethane in a 125 mL flask.
The reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 h and then stirred for
72 h at room temperature. The resultant solution was washed
with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (6 ꢀ 30 mL), dried with
Na2SO4, and evaporated under vacuum to yield product 3 as a
viscous liquid. Yield: 91%. Selected IR data (KBr): ν (C-HAr
and C-HAliph) 3052-2842; ν (CdC and CdN) 1590-1434; δ
(O-H) 1372; ν (C-Ophenol and C-Oester) 1296-1150; ν (CdO)
1743; δ (C-HAr) 764 in cm-1. 1H NMR δH (400 MHz; CDCl3):
2.23 (3 H, s, CH3); 3.60 (4 H, s, CH2); 3.71 (6H, s, CH3); 3.80 (2
H, s, CH2); 3.90 (4 H, s, CH2); 3.96 (2 H, s, CH2); 6.95 (2H, d,
CHAr); 7.14-7.17 (2H, m, CHAr); 7.43-7.45 (2H, m, CHAr);
Synthesis of [Gd3L2(NO3)2(H2O)4]NO3 8H2O (1). Complex
3
1 was prepared by adding Gd(NO3)3 6H2O to a methanolic
3
solution containing the ligand H3L and NaOH (3:2:6
stoichiometry), under magnetic stirring at 40 °C for 40 min.
After total solvent evaporation, the solid obtained was recrys-
tallized in a methanol/ethanol/acetone (1:1:1) solution mixture,
yielding colorless monocrystals suitable for X-ray analysis.
Yield: 20%. Found: C, 32.21; H, 4.18; N, 8.50. Calcd for
[Gd3(C25H25N4O5)2(NO3)2(H2O)4]NO3 8H2O: C, 33.42; H,
3
4.15; N, 8.57. Selected IR data (KBr): ν (O-H, C-HAr and
C-HAliph) 3550-2922; ν (CdC and CdN) 1602-1450; ν
(C-Ophenol) 1256 and 1228; ν (COO-) 1654 and 1450; ν
(NO3-) 1482, 1386, and 1295; δ (C-HAr) 786 in cm-1. ESI-
MS: [Gd3L(NO3)3(CH3CN)6(H2O)6]3þ m/z 492; [Gd3L(NO3)3-
(CH3CN)5(H2O)6]3þ m/z 478; [Gd3L(NO3)3(CH3CN)4-
(H2O)6]3þ m/z 464 (only fragment ions were observed, probably
because of the gas-phase conditions).
Single-Crystal X-ray Structure Determination. A fragment
with dimensions of 0.26 ꢀ 0.44 ꢀ 0.47 mm3 was selected from a
crystalline sample of complex 1 for crystallographic analysis. X-
ray diffraction data were measured on a Kappa-CCD diffracto-
˚
meter with graphite-monochromated Mo KR (λ = 0.71073 A)
radiation, at room temperature. Diffraction data were collected
(j and ω scans with K-offsets) with COLLECT.15 Integration
and scaling of the reflections were performed with HKL DEN-
ZO-SCALEPACK suite of programs. The unit cell parameters
were obtained by least-squares refinement based on the angular
settings for all collected reflections using HKL SCALEPACK.16
Gaussian absorption correction was applied to the collected
reflections with PLATON,17 with maximum and minimum
transmission factors of 0.496 and 0.278, respectively. The
structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full-
matrix least-squares on F2.18 All non-hydrogen atoms were
refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen
atoms bond to C atoms were placed at their idealized positions
using standard geometric criteria. H atoms of the coordinated
and uncoordinated water molecules could not be located from
the Fourier difference map. Further crystallographic informa-
tion is presented in Table 1.
7.63-7.64 (2H, m, CHAr); 8.54-8.56 (2H, m, CHAr) in ppm. 13
C
Full tables containing the crystallographic data (except struc-
ture factors) were deposited at Cambridge Structural Database
(CCDC 752704) and these data are available free of charge at
NMR δ (100 MHz; CDCl3): 20.69; 51.84; 53.36; 54.44; 55.83;
59.48; 122.42; 123.23; 123.49; 127.99; 130.69; 130.83; 136.97;
149.10; 153.86; 158.44; 171.97 in ppm.
Preparation of 2-[N-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)aminomethyl]-4-me-
thyl-6-[N-bis(2-hydroxy-2-oxoethyl)aminomethyl]phenol (H3L).
Potentiometric Titrations. The potentiometric studies were
carried out with a Corning-350 research pH meter fitted with
blue-glass and Ag/AgCl reference electrodes calibrated to read
(12) Bunton, C. A.; Farber, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 767–772.
(13) Karsten, P.; Neves, A.; Bortoluzzi, A. J.; Lanznaster, M.; Drago, V.
Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 4624–4626.
(14) Lambert, E; Chabut, B.; Chardon-Noblat, S; Deronzier, A; Chot-
tard, G.; Bousseksou, A; Tuchagues, J.-P.; Laugier, J.; Bardet, M.; Latour,
J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9424–9437.
(15) COLLECT; Enraf-Nonius BV: Delft, The Netherlands, 2000.
(16) Otwinowski, Z.; , Minor, W. In Methods Enzymol.; Carter, C. W., Jr.,
Sweet, R.M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1997; Vol. 2, p 307.
(17) Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr. 2009, D65, 148–155.
(18) Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, A64, 112–122.