C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
For comparative purposes, we performed similar experiments
using DIFO-biotin6 and DIBO-biotin16c (Figure 2B). BARAC-biotin
showed the best labeling after 1 h. To quantify the differences in
reaction kinetics among the reagents in the context of cell surface
labeling, we measured cell surface fluorescence at various time
points during a 30-min incubation with the cyclooctynes (Figure
2C). After 1 min, BARAC-biotin gave a 10-fold higher signal than
either DIFO-biotin or DIBO-biotin, consistent with BARAC’s ∼12-
fold higher rate constant. The high level of reactivity of BARAC-
biotin was not accompanied by any cytotoxicity compared to cells
treated with no cyclooctyne reagent (Figures S5 and S6, Supporting
Information).
reagent for real-time and in vivo imaging of azide-labeled
biomolecules.
Acknowledgment. J.C.J. was supported by a postdoctoral
fellowship from the American Cancer Society, and E.M.S. was
supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the Organic Division
of the American Chemical Society (Genentech). This work was
supported by a grant to C.R.B. from the National Institutes of Health
(GM58867).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
spectral data, and assay data. This material is available free of charge
We next evaluated BARAC-Fluor (17) as a reagent for direct
fluorescence imaging of live Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.
CHO cells grown in either the presence or absence of 50 µM
Ac4ManNAz were treated with 5 µM BARAC-Fluor (11) for 5 min
at rt, washed, and then imaged (Figure 3A-H). The azide-labeled
CHO cells showed robust cell surface fluorescence.
References
(1) Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6974–
6998.
(2) Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 13–21.
(3) Kele, P.; Li, X.; Link, M.; Nagy, K.; Herner, A.; Lorincz, K.; Beni, S.;
Wolfbeis, O. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3486–3490.
(4) Wolbers, F.; ter Braak, P.; Le Gac, S.; Luttge, R.; Andersson, H.; Vermes,
I.; van den Berg, A. Electrophoresis 2006, 27, 5073.
(5) For a recent review of all bioorthogonal Cu-free click cycloadditions, see:
Jewett, J. C.; Bertozzi, C. R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2010, in press DOI:10.1039/
B901970G.
(6) Baskin, J. M.; Prescher, J. A.; Laughlin, S. T.; Agard, N. J.; Chang, P. V.;
Miller, I. A.; Lo, A.; Codelli, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2007, 104, 16793–16797.
(7) Johnson, J. A.; Baskin, J. M.; Bertozzi, C. R.; Koberstein, J. T.; Turro,
N. J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3064–3066.
(8) Laughlin, S. T.; Baskin, J. M.; Amacher, S. L.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science
2008, 320, 664–667.
(9) Ning, X.; Guo, J.; Wolfert, M. A.; Boons, G.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 2253–2255.
(10) Ess, D. H.; Jones, G. O.; Houk, K. N. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1633–1636.
(11) Rate constants for these reactions have been measured in different solvents,
thus a direct comparison cannot be made on the basis of published data.
However, DIBO has been reported to react with benzyl azide in methanol
with a second-order rate constant of 0.06 M-1 s-1 (ref 16c), whereas DIFO
reacts with the same substrate in acetonitrile with a second-order rate
constant of 0.08 M-1 s-1 (ref 6).
(12) Debets, M. F.; van Berkel, S. S.; Schoffelen, S.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T.; van
Hest, J. C. M.; van Delft, F. L. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 97–99.
(13) (a) Wong, H. N. C.; Garratt, P. J.; Sondheimer, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974,
96, 5604–5605. (b) Gugel, H.; Meier, H. Chem. Ber. 1980, 113, 1431–
1443.
(14) Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3097–3099.
(15) Chang, P. V.; Prescher, J. A.; Sletten, E. M.; Baskin, J. M.; Miller, I. A.;
Agard, N. J.; Lo, A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010,
107, 1821–1826.
(16) (a) Agard, N. J.; Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 15046–1504. (b) Codelli, J. A.; Baskin, J. M.; Agard, N. J.; Bertozzi,
C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11486–11493. (c) For a recent paper
that addresses this problem, see: Poloukhtine, A. A.; Mbua, N. E.; Wolfert,
M. A.; Boons, G.-J.; Popik, V. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15769–
15776.
Figure 3. Imaging of azide-labeled glycans on live cells using BARAC-
Fluor (17). (A-P) CHO cells were incubated with (A-D, I-L) or without
(E-H, M-P) 50 µM Ac4ManNAz for 3 days. (A-H) The cells were
subsequently labeled with 5 µM BARAC-Fluor and Hoechst-33342 for 5
min and then washed and imaged. (I-P) The cells were subsequently labeled
with 250 nM BARAC-Fluor for 30 min and Hoechst-33342 and then imaged
without washing. Channels shown are differential interference contrast
bright-field (A, E, I, M), the blue DAPI channel (B, F, J, N), the green
FITC channel (C, G, K, O), and the DAPI/FITC channels merged (D, H,
L, P).
(17) Atanes, N.; Escudero, S.; Pe´rez, D.; Guitia´n, E.; Castedo, L. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 3039–3040.
(18) Sampson, P.; Wiemer, D. F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 1746–
1747.
(19) Letcher, R. M.; Kwok, N.-C.; Lo, W.-H.; Ng, K.-W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 1715–1719.
(20) (a) Abraham, T. Monat. Fu¨r Chemie 1989, 120, 117–126. (b) Grandini,
C.; Camurati, I.; Guidotti, S.; Mascellani, N.; Resconi, L.; Nifant’ev, I. E.;
Kashulin, I. A.; Ivchenko, P. V.; Mercandelli, P.; Sironi, A. Organometallics
2004, 23, 344–360.
(21) Okamoto, T. A.; Kobayashi, S. M.; Yamamoto, H. N. German Pat.
DE1952019 1970.
(22) Nifant’ev, I. E.; Kashulin, I. A.; Bagrov, V. V.; Abilev, S. K.; Lyubimova,
I. K. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001, 50, 1439–1445.
(23) (a) For an early review on this type of reaction, see: Huisgen, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1963, 2, 565–598. (b) For a recent application of this
chemistry, see: Gutsmiedl, K.; Wirges, C. T.; Ehmke, V.; Carell, T. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 2405–2408.
In some situations, washing away unbound fluorescent labeling
reagents is difficult or impossible. Such cases include whole animal
imaging experiments, real-time imaging of cultured cells, and
situations in which the biomolecular targets are intracellular. We
reasoned that BARAC’s superior sensitivity, the consequence of
its kinetics and low nonspecific background reactivity, would allow
for use of low labeling concentrations that eliminate the need for
washing steps. Cells were cultured as before but labeled with 250
nM BARAC-Fluor for 30 min at rt. Without washing away excess
reagent we imaged the cells (Figure 3I-P) and observed clear
labeling above background. BARAC is therefore a promising
(24) The half-life for the reaction of equimolar amounts of BARAC with benzyl
azide at 10 mM is ∼45 s at rt. The half-life of the potential background
reaction of 2 mM BARAC with 5 mM glutathione in CD3CN/D2O (1:2)
was 24 h at rt.
(25) Laughlin, S. T.; Bertozzi, C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106,
12–17.
JA100014Q
9
3690 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 11, 2010