rings. In these and the present cases, a concerted process which
requires an in-line attack through a trigonal bipyramidal TS
with leaving and entering groups at the apical position cannot
occur, leaving the only possible pathway to be a two step one
which would be clearly evident if isomerization of 6a/6b could
be demonstrated. Phosphonates are generally at least 10 times
more susceptible to nucleophilic attack than their correspond-
ing phosphates24,25 (130–300 fold faster in this work with aryl
phenylphosphonates vs. methoxy aryl phosphates vide supra) and
4-catalyzed intramolecular attack of the 2-hydroxypropyl oxygen
on the central P of phosphate diesters is 1000 to 5000 times faster
than direct nucleophilic attack of coordinated methoxide.14–17,18
Thus, it is difficult to envision that a similar attack cannot occur in
phosphonates 6a/6b to give a 5-coordinate intermediate, although
isomerization of these species via a cyclic ester as was seen with
the diesters 1j/1j¢ is precluded. A proposed mechanism by which
phosphonates 6a and 6b might undergo isomerization is via a suite
of pseudo-rotating phosphoranes 10a,b and 11a,b as in Scheme 3.
the intramolecular cyclization, and thus should occur independent
of whether the 2-hydroxypropyl group is present. The fact that the
kcat for cleavage of the leaving group from 6a lies on the line of
max
the Brønsted plot constructed for the O-aryl phenylphosphonates
(8) suggests that all these phenylphosphonate esters react by a
common mechanism that probably involves a concerted attack of
Zn(II) coordinated methoxide on the P. This is similar to one of
the mechanisms that was proposed for cleavage of aryl methyl
phosphate diester DNA models by 4.17 That the rate constant for
the cleavage of 6b lies considerably below this line likely results
from a steric effect in the displacement of a secondary alcoholate
relative to a primary one.14b
Conclusions
An observation that 6a ↔ 6b isomerization occurred during
the slow cleavage of these phosphonates would provide pow-
erful evidence for the existence of 5-coordinate phosphorane
intermediates, and thus lend credence to the possibility that
such intermediates could occur during the cleavage of phosphate
diesters 1a–k. However, no observed isomerization does not
provide as convincing evidence for the absence of phosphorane
intermediates. Such intermediates could be formed but their
lifetime is too short, or they are too conformationally restricted
when bound to the catalyst, to allow the pseudorotations required
for isomerization. It was noted,11 in a recent report of a man-
made catalyst promoting the isomerization of 3¢5¢-UpU to 2¢5¢-
UpU concurrent with cleavage of the former, that “enzymes or
ribozymes that catalyze RNA cleavage do not appear to catalyze
isomerization as well, but presumably in these cases, the confines of
the active site even more firmly direct the reaction toward cleavage
if similar phosphoranes are involved”.
Scheme 3 Postulated process by which isomerization of 6a and 6b might
occur. Equatorial substituents on phosphoranes identified by dashed
triangle.
On the other hand, the lack of isomerization of 6a/6b and the
previous data14b are in full accord with the simplest explanation of
a concerted process for the catalytic cleavage of 1a–k.
From X-ray crystallographic structure considerations of the
14a
18b
Zn(II)2
and Cu(II)2
complexes of the 1,3-bis-N1-(1,5,9-
triazacyclododecyl)propane ligand, intramolecular attack of the
hydroxypropyl anion on a doubly Zn(II)-coordinated 6a or 6b
can occur most easily perpendicular to the plane defined by the
Zn(II)-O--P–O--Zn(II) moiety and in line with the P-Ph bond. This
gives phosphoranes 10a or 10b in which the attacking group and
the phenyl substituent occupy apical positions while the two O--
Zn(II) units occupy equatorial positions. Interconversion of 10a
to 10b requires two pseudorotations to form 11a and then 11b
in which each of the oxygens of the 5-membered cycle is in turn
apical to an apical O-Zn(II) group, violating one of the Westheimer
rules.26 The final formation of the isomerized product (6b from 6a
or vice versa) from the process proposed in Scheme 3 requires a
third pseudorotation placing the Ph and departing oxyanion in
apical positions.
An alternative explanation, less likely in our opinion for this
system due to the restrictive geometry of the complex, deems that
the initial attack of the hydroxypropyl oxyanion occurs anti to
one of the O--Zn(II) units, meaning that 6a would directly give 11b
and 6b would give 11a. These would have to interconvert to effect
isomerization again violating a Westheimer rule.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the financial assistance of NSERC and
the Canada Foundation for Innovation. This project also received
support from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency-Joint Science
and Technology Office, Basic and Supporting Science Division,
Grant # HDTRA-08-1-0046.
Notes and references
1 N. H. Williams, B. Takasaki, M. Wall and J. Chin, Acc. Chem. Res.,
1999, 32, 485.
2 G. K. Schroeder, C. Lad, P. Wyman, N. H. Williams and R. Wolfenden,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 4052.
3 H. Yang, P. D. Carr, S. Y. McLoughlin, J. W. Liu, I. Horne, X. Qiu,
C. M. J. Jeffries, R. J. Russell, J. G. Oakeshott and D. L. Ollis, Protein
Eng., 2003, 16, 135.
4 (a) E. E. Kim and H. W. Wyckoff, J. Mol. Biol., 1991, 218, 449; (b) B.
Stec, K. M. Holtz and E. R. Kantrowitz, J. Mol. Biol., 2000, 299, 1303.
5 (a) S. Hansen, L. K. Hansen and E. Hough, J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 231,
870; (b) S. Hansen, L. Kristian, H. Hough and E. Hough, J. Mol. Biol.,
1992, 225, 543; (c) E. Hough, L. K. Hansen, B. Birknes, K. Jynge, S.
Hansen, A. Hordvik, C. Little, E. Dodson and Z. Derewenda, Nature,
1989, 338, 357.
Despite the above considerations, 6a/6b isomerization is not
observed and the only reaction products detected were those of the
cleavage of the O-alkyl substituents, namely 1,2-propanediol and
O-methyl phenylphosphonate. This latter reaction does not involve
6 C. Romier, R. Dominguez, A. Lahm, O. Dahl and D. Suck, Proteins,
1998, 32, 414; A. Volbeda, A. Lahm, F. Sakiyama and D. Suck,
EMBO J., 1991, 10, 1607.
7 P. J. O’Brien and D. Herschlag, Biochemistry, 2001, 40, 5691.
826 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 822–827
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
©