transmetalation between cyclopropylmethylstannane11 and
indium halide and its radical coupling reaction with R-io-
docarbonyl compounds, although a catalytic trial failed.12
In this communication, we report the GaCl3- or InBr3-
catalyzed cyclopropylmethylation of alkyl chlorides, which
are readily available but less reactive than iodides or
bromides, with cyclopropylmethylstannane (Scheme 1).
Contrary to our previous report, this reaction proceeded by
an ionic mechanism, which apparently enabled the catalytic
coupling. In addition, the generated butenylgallium inter-
mediate was isolated and confirmed by its complexation with
a phosphine ligand.
Table 1. Reaction of 1-Chloro-1-(4-methylphenyl)ethane (2a)
with Cyclopropylmethylstannane 1a
yield (%)b
entry
catalyst
solvent
3a
4a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
none
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
hexane
toluene
MeCN
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
0
81
69
58
59
52
0
57
55
55
73
45
71
0
19
18
19
26
19
0
14
14
15
20
13
21
InBr3
InCl3
InI3
Scheme 1
.
Reactivity of Butenylgallium or Butenylindium
Species
InBr3
InBr3
InBr3
GaCl3
GaBr3
InBr3
InBr3
GaCl3
GaCl3
9
10c
11d
12c
13d
a All entries were carried out at 0 °C for 2 h using 1.0 mmol of 1, 1.0
mmol of 2a, and 0.05 mmol of catalyst. b Determined by 1H NMR. c TEMPO
(0.05 mmol) was added. d Galvinoxyl (0.05 mmol) was added.
First, we chose the reaction of 1-chloro-1-(4-methylphe-
nyl)ethane (2a) with cyclopropylmethylstannane 1 for the
investigation of the catalysts (Table 1).13 No reaction took
place without catalyst loading (entry 1). Use of 5 mol % of
InBr3 in CH2Cl2 effectively promoted the coupling reaction
to afford the cyclopropylmethylated product 3a in 81% yield
along with 19% yield of the ring-opening product 4a (entry
2). Other indium halides, InCl3 or InI3, gave yields lower
than that of InBr3 (entries 3 and 4). Hydrocarbon solvents
such as hexane and toluene were also effective (entries 5
and 6), whereas no reaction was observed in MeCN, perhaps
because the interaction between the indium catalyst and the
substrates was disturbed by its strong coordination ability
(entry 7). In addition, it was found that gallium halide was
also an efficient catalyst (entries 8 and 9). The reactions were
not affected by the addition of a radical inhibitor, such as
TEMPO or galvinoxyl, which had completely disturbed the
reactions with R-haloesters, as previously reported12 (entries
10-13). These data strongly indicated that the reaction
proceeded in an ionic manner. All previous reactions of
organic halides with organoindium species proceed via a
radical mechanism. For example, the reduction by indium
hydride14 and the coupling between R-halocarbonyl com-
pounds with vinyl-, allyl-, or alkynylindium species15 are
both known to be radical reactions.16 Organogallium spe-
cies9,15,17 also reacted with organic halides in a radical
manner. An ionic reaction with organic halides has never
been reported for either the organoindium or the organogal-
lium species, as far as we know.
(9) Usugi, S.; Tsuritani, T.; Yorimitsu, H.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 841–845.
(10) (a) Nozaki, K.; Oshima, K.; Utimoto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 2547–2549. (b) Yorimitsu, H.; Nakamura, T.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima,
K.; Omoto, K.; Fujimoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11041–11047.
(c) Ollivier, C.; Renaud, P. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3415–3434. (d)
Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P.,
Sibi, M. P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 1, Chapter 1.2.
(11) (a) Brown, R. S.; Eaton, D. F.; Hosomi, A.; Traylor, T. G.; Wright,
J. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 66, 249–254. (b) San Filippo, J., Jr.;
Silbermann, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2831–2836. (c) Alnajjar, M. S.;
Smith, G. F.; Kuivila, H. G. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1271–1276. (d) Lucke,
A. J.; Young, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 807–810. (e) Lucke, A. J.;
Young, D. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3579–3583.
We next explored the scope of this system using either
InBr3 or GaCl3 catalyst (Table 2). Various secondary benzylic
chlorides furnished cyclopropylmethylated products in mod-
erate to high yields (entries 1-12).18 In the case of 2c and
2e, which bear two types of chlorine atoms, selective
coupling was achieved at benzylic positions. 3-Chlorocy-
(14) Baba, A.; Shibata, I. Chem. Rec. 2005, 5, 323–335.
(15) Takami, K.; Usugi, S.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Synthesis 2005,
824–839.
(12) Yasuda, M.; Kiyokawa, K.; Osaki, K.; Baba, A. Organometallics
2009, 28, 132–139.
(13) The reaction using unmethylated cyclopropylmethylstannane failed.
An equimolar use of indium halide was required. The reaction of
unmethylated cyclopropylmethylstannane (2 mmol) with benzhydryl chloride
(1 mmol) in the presence of InBr3 (1 mmol) in dichloromethane gave
cyclopropylmethylated product in 58% yield (ring-opening product, 28%
yield).
(16) A halogen substitution reaction using alkylindium species toward
haloalkenes was reported, see: Nomura, R.; Miyazaki, S.-i.; Matsuda, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2738–2740.
(17) A gallium hydride also reacts with organic halides in a radical
manner, see: Mikami, S.; Fujita, K.; Nakamura, T.; Yorimitsu, H.;
Shinokubo, H.; Matsubara, S.; Oshima, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1853–1855
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 7, 2010
1521