7426
K.R. Idzik et al. / Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 7419–7426
Generally, the application of the meta-linkages is rarely
reported. However, in some cases meta-substitution is desired,
mainly due to the better control of the energy gap (Eg). We obtained
poly[1,3,5-tris(aryl)benzene]s with relatively large Eg, which is
required for blue light-emitting materials. In addition, following the
data set resulting from optical and electrochemical measurements,
we conclude, that oligomers containing EDOT groups are much
more stable and probably also better conducting, than thienyl, or
furyl analogues. The hydroxyl substituent has a significant influ-
ence on the electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical properties
of oligoarylbenzenes. In the whole class of these compounds the
decrease of oxidation potential and energy gap is observed. On the
other hand, this substituent enables coupling among particular aryl
arms, which are connected at the meta-position. Thus, this leads
to the improvement of the polymer overall stability and signifi-
cant enhancement of polymer conductivity. The overall analysis
from point of view of chemistry, electrochemistry supported by
spectroscopic methods confirms, that the compounds described in
this paper could be considered as a material for the whole class of
organic–electronic devices.
Scheme 3. Proposed conjugation paths in poly(TOPh) in its oxidized state at approx-
imately −0.3 V.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant of Ministry of Science and
Higher Education NN205106935, by the European Community
from the European Social Fund within the RFSD 2 project, and the
European Union Project SNIB, MTKD-CT-2005-029554.
References
[1] L. Liao, Y. Pang, L. Ding, F.E. Karasz, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 7300.
[2] S.Y. Hong, D.Y. Kim, C.Y. Kim, R. Hoffmann, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 6474.
[3] F. Cherioux, L. Guyard, P. Audebert, Chem. Commun. 20 (1998) 2225.
[4] C. Belot, C. Filiatre, L. Guyard, A. Foissy, M. Knorr, Electrochem. Commun. 7
(2005) 1439.
Fig. 7. UV-Vis spectra performed on polymer films: (—) poly(FPh),
poly(FOPh) and ( ) poly(EPh). (For interpretation of the references to color
in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of the article.)
(
)
[5] X. Sun, Y. Liu, S. Chen, W. Qiu, G. Yu, Y. Ma, T. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Xu, D. Zhu, Adv.
Funct. Mater. 16 (2006) 917.
[6] M.E. Köse, W.J. Mitchell, N. Kopidakis, C.H. Chang, S.E. Shaheen, K. Kim, G.
Rumbles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 14257.
[7] N. Kopidakis, W.J. Mitchell, J. van de Lagemaat, D.S. Ginley, G. Rumbles, S.E.
Shaheen, W.L. Rance, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 103524.
[8] C.J. Xia, X. Fan, J. Locklin, R.C. Advincula, A. Gies, W. Nonidez, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126 (2004) 8735.
[9] C.J. Xia, X. Fan, J. Locklin, R.C. Advincula, Org. Lett. 4 (2002) 2067.
[10] W.J. Mitchell, N. Kopidakis, G. Rumbles, D.S. Ginley, S.E. Shaheen, J. Mater. Chem.
15 (2005) 4518.
[11] F. Cherioux, L. Guyard, Adv. Funct. Mater. 11 (2001) 305.
[12] K. Idzik, J. Soloducho, M. Lapkowski, S. Golba, Electrochim. Acta 53 (2008) 5665.
[13] K.R. Justin-Thomas, J.T. Lin, Y.T. Tao, C.W. Ko, Chem. Mater. 14 (2002) 1354.
[14] S.A. Ponomarenko, S. Kirchmeyer, A. Elschner, B.H. Huisman, A. Karbach, D.
Drechsler, Adv. Funct. Mater. 13 (2003) 591.
[15] R. de Bettignies, Y. Nicolas, P. Blanchard, E. Levillain, J.M. Nunzi, J. Roncali, Adv.
Mater. 15 (2003) 1939.
[16] Y. Nicolas, P. Blanchard, E. Levillain, M. Allain, N. Mercier, J. Roncali, Org. Lett.
6 (2004) 273.
[17] J.M. Tour, A.M. Rawlett, M. Kozaki, Y. Yao, R.C. Jagessar, S.M. Dirk, D.W. Price,
M.A. Reed, C.-W. Zhou, J. Chen, W. Wang, I. Campbell, Chem. Eur. J. 7 (2001)
5118.
[18] M. Kinoshita, Y. Shirota, Chem. Lett. 7 (2001) 614.
[19] S.S. Zhu, T.M. Swager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (1997) 12568.
[20] K.R. Idzik, R. Beckert, S. Golba, P. Ledwon, M. Lapkowski, Tetrahedron Lett. 51
(2010) 2396.
absorption by a polymer in its neutral state, while the second one
arises from its oxidized form. In fact, the oxidized form appears
because polymer does not undergo entirely the de-doping pro-
cess. In the case of poly(FPh) spectra one maximum at 291 nm is
present, while for poly(FOPh) two maxima at 288 nm and 363 nm
are observed. The energy gap values amount to 3.34 eV, 2.8 eV and
2.74 eV for poly(FPh), poly(TPh) and poly(EPh), respectively. Tak-
ing under consideration the polymers with hydroxyl groups, the
value of Eg is lowered significantly achieving 2.73 eV and 2.00 eV for
poly(FOPh) and poly(TOPh), respectively. This may be attributed to
the strong influence of a hydroxyl substituent on the aryl arms, not
only by decreasing the oxidation potential, but also by increasing
the effective conjugation length between the aryl arms. This cou-
pling is present only in polymers and suggests that the conjugation
itself can expand beyond the hydroxyl groups through thiophene
or furan moieties.
4. Conclusion
[21] J. Roncali, Chem. Rev. 92 (1992) 711.
All monomers containing thienyl, furyl and EDOT groups were
successfully synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic meth-
ods. The cyclic voltammetry method was successfully applied,
because all of target compounds are electroactive and undergo
electropolymerization creating thin films directly on the surface
of electrodes.
[22] J. Kontrec, V. Swetlicic, Electrochim. Acta 43 (1997) 589.
[23] C. Song, T. Swager, Macromolecules 38 (2005) 4569.
[24] A.L.P. Cornacchio, J.T. Price, M.C. Jennings, R. McDonald, V.N. Staroverov, N.D.
Jones, J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 530.
[25] T. Sato, K. Hori, M. Fujitsuka, A. Watanabe, O. Ito, K. Tanaka, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 94 (1998) 2355.