C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
1H NMR analysis. Samples of DMOF-N3 were digested and
dissolved in dilute DCl/D2O/DMSO-d6 solution (Figure 1) and then
analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy, which confirmed the formation
of the azide compound by the appearance of new aromatic signals
(7.74-7.85 ppm, m, 3H, ArH). This coincided with the complete
disappearance of the aromatic signals of the amine (7 ppm, d, 1H,
J ) 8.3 Hz; 7.4 ppm, s, 1H; 7.74 ppm, d, 1H, J ) 8.3 Hz), thus
indicating full conversion to the azide form. On the other hand,
the aliphatic moiety was not affected by the reaction (section S3).
DMOF-fun obtained after the one-pot synthesis was characterized
using identical techniques. Here again, the conversion to the final
compound was complete after 24 h. IR analysis revealed the
complete disappearance of the azide stretching band at 2123 cm-1
(section S3). The liquid 1H NMR spectrum of DMOF-fun illustrates
that the corresponding triazole derivative was formed as the unique
product; aromatic shifts of the grafted compound were assigned
by 1H-1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY) experiments (δ ) 7.38,
7.49, 7.93, 8.04, 8.19, 9.15 ppm), and no azido or amino compound
was detected (Figure 1). In addition, positive-mode mass spec-
trometry performed after digestion clearly showed a base peak at
m/z 310 corresponding to the functionalized linker [2-(4-phenyl-
1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)terephthalic acid]. The powder X-ray diffraction
patterns indicated that the two-step reaction proceeded without loss
of long-range order (section S3). We stress that the crystallinity of
the parent DMOF-NH2 is strongly affected by post-treatments such
as solvent removal and/or solvent exchange (section S2).
byproducts such as water, acids, or bases that could damage the
structure by hydrolysis.22 Finally, in contrast to the anhydride
condensation method, which has
a limited grafting yield
(30-50%),23 we have shown that this approach allows complete
functionalization even for a bulky group. This is in line with
molecular modeling results showing weak steric demand (section
S3). Notably, the crystallite sizes of the two MOFs are ∼1 µm
(section S1), whereas Wang et al.11 used DMOF-NH2 crystallites
with diameters of 100 µm. We believe that the accessibility of
reactants to the centers of the crystals arises from the very small
size of the MOF crystallites.
However, this small size comes at the expense of a decrease in
microporous volume. Thanks to the efficiency of the azide
formation, the grafting rate can be controlled by adding pheny-
lacetylene in default with respect to -NH2 functions. For a grafting
rate of 50% on MIL-68(In)-NH2, the surface area decreased only
by 55% (SBET ) 571 m2/g), which is in line with other methods.8
In this study, controlled functionalization was performed with
phenylacetylene as a proof of concept. A systematic study dealing
with the grafting of moieties exhibiting different functions on
diverse amino-MOF platforms will be reported soon. We believe
that this method will allow the design of tailor-made catalysts with
more complex functional groups.
Acknowledgment. We thank A. Camarata for the technical
work, along with IRCELYON and IFP scientific services.
Nitrogen physisorption experiments performed on the parent
DMOF-NH2 and DMOF-fun at 77 K revealed a decreases in the
porous surface area (1320 to 244 m2/g) and the microporous volume
(0.54 to 0.08 cm3/g) due to pore blocking (section S3).
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures, charac-
terization data, and molecular modeling results. This material is
References
(1) (a) Fe´rey, G. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 191. (b) Farrusseng, D.; Aguado,
S.; Pinel, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7502.
(2) Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J.; Rosi, N.; Vodak, D.; Wachter, J.; O’Keefe, M.;
Yaghi, O. M. Science 2002, 295, 469.
(3) Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 376.
(4) Bauer, S.; Serre, C.; Devic, T.; Horcajada, P.; Marrot, J.; Fe´rey, G.; Stock,
N. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 7568.
(5) (a) Yang, C.; Wang, X. P.; Omary, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
15454. (b) Kawano, M.; Kawamichi, T.; Haneda, T.; Kojima, T.; Fujita,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15418.
(6) Fischer, R. A.; Woll, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8164.
(7) Wang, Z. Q.; Cohen, S. M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 1315.
(8) Wang, Z. Q.; Cohen, S. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4699.
(9) Wright, A. P.; Davis, M. E. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3589.
(10) (a) Brunel, D. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 27, 329. (b) Brunel,
D.; Blanc, A. C.; Galarneau, A.; Fajula, F. Catal. Today 2002, 73, 139.
(11) Wang, Z. Q.; Tanabe, K. K.; Cohen, S. M. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 296.
(12) Goto, Y.; Sato, H.; Shinkai, S.; Sada, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
14354.
(13) (a) Gadzikwa, T.; Lu, G.; Stern, C. L.; Wilson, S. R.; Hupp, J. T.; Nguyen,
S. T. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5493. (b) Gadzikwa, T.; Farha, O. K.;
Malliakas, C. D.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Hupp, J. T.; Nguyen, S. T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13613.
(14) Savonnet, M.; Bazer-Bachi, D.; Pinel, C.; Lecocq, V.; Bats, N.; Farrusseng,
D. FR Patent 09/05.107, 2009.
(15) Savonnet, M.; Bazer-Bachi, D.; Pinel, C.; Lecocq, V.; Bats, N.; Farrusseng,
D. 2009, FR Patent 09/05.101, 2009.
(16) (a) Kitagawa, S.; Tanaka, D. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 922. (b) Seki, K.
Langmuir 2002, 18, 2441. (c) Kitagawa, S.; Kitaura, R.; Noro, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2334.
(17) Yaghi, O. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Rosi, N. L.; Kim, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Chen,
B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1504.
(18) Barral, K.; Moorhouse, A. D.; Moses, J. E. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1809.
(19) Savonnet, M.; Bazer-Bachi, D.; Pinel, C.; Lecocq, V.; Bats, N.; Farrusseng,
D. FR Patent 09/04.521, 2009.
(20) Savonnet, M.; Bazer-Bachi, D.; Pinel, C.; Lecocq, V.; Bats, N.; Farrusseng,
D. FR Patent 09/05.102, 2009.
(21) Ahnfeldt, T.; Guillou, N.; Gunzelmann, D.; Margiolaki, I.; Loiseau, T.;
Fe´rey, G.; Senker, J.; Stock, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5163.
(22) Savonnet, M.; Aguado, S.; Ravon, U.; Bazer-Bachi, D.; Lecocq, V.; Bats,
N.; Pinel, C.; Farrusseng, D. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1729.
(23) Tanabe, K. K.; Cohen, S. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7424.
Figure 1. Liquid 1H NMR spectra of digested materials: (top) DMOF-
NH2; (middle) DMOF-N3; (bottom) DMOF-fun.
These investigations were also undertaken for the postfunction-
alization of MIL-68(In)-NH2, and the same results were obtained
in terms of grafting rate (>90%), decrease in surface area (1260 to
120 m2/g) and microporous volume (0.48 to 0.03 cm3/g), and
preservation of crystallinity (section S6).
Cycloaddition in azide-functionalized MOFs has recently been
demonstrated for IRMOF-type compounds.12 In this work, we have
shown that direct functionalization from amino-derived MOFs is
possible, provided that the pore cavity is large enough to accom-
modate a C5 ring (section S3). The main advantage of this one-pot
method is the ease of preparing amino-functionalized MOFs. To
the best of our knowledge, five different structures based on
2-aminoterephthalic acid have been reported to date: IRMOF-3,2
MIL-101-NH2,4 CAU-1,21 DMOF-NH2, and MIL-53(Al)-NH2. The
large library of amino acids also opens promising perspectives for
new potential amino-functionalized MOFs as synthetic platforms.
A second advantage is the softness of the method. Indeed, both
reaction steps proceed at room temperature and do not liberate
JA909613E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 13, 2010 4519