1746
Z. Du et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 1745–1747
Table 1
Table 2
Indium-mediated one-pot synthesis of homoallyl esters from aldehydes, acyl
Indium-mediated one-pot synthesis of homoallyl esters from aldehydes, acid
chlorides, and allyl bromidea
anhydrides, and allyl bromidea
O
O
O
In
In
O C R1
Br
O C R2
Br
R1 C Cl
RCHO
+
+
(R2CO)2O
RCHO
+
+
THF
THF
R
R
R1=CH3, C2H5, ph
R2=CH3, C2H5
1a-i
2a-n
Yieldb (%)
Entry
R
R1
Time (min)
Yieldb (%)
Entry
R
R2
Time (min)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ph
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
C2H5
C2H5
C2H5
C2H5
Ph
40
50
50
45
40
35
50
50
80
1a, 87
1b, 89
1c, 87
1d, 90
1e, 90
1f, 92
1g, 91
1h, 92
1i, 51
NPc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3-CH3OC6H4
2-ClC6H4
4-ClC6H4
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
CH3
C2H5
C2H5
C2H5
C2H5
C2H5
50
50
50
50
45
50
65
40
45
50
50
2a, 94
2b, 94
2c, 93
2d, 96
2e, 92
2f, 92
2g, 91
2h, 94
2i, 92
2j, 91
2k, 93
4-ClC6H4
2-ClC6H4
4-CNC6H4
4-CH3C6H4
3-CH3OC6H4
4-CNC6H4
2-ClC6H4
2,4-Cl2C6H3
C6H11
2-CH3OC6H4
4-CNC6H4
2,4-Cl2C6H3
2,4-Cl2C6H3
2-CH3OC6H4
4-CH3C6H4
4-CNC6H4
4-BrC6H4
10
11
C2H5
Ph
120
180
10
11
C6H11
NPc
12
CH3
60
NPc
12
13
CH3
55
55
2l, 92
O
S
O
O
NPc
C2H5
2m, 93
13
Ph
100
a
14
C2H5
55
2n, 91
Reaction conditions: indium 1.0 mmol, ArCHO 1.0 mmol, allyl bromide
S
1.5 mmol, R1COCl 1.2 mmol, THF 2 ml, 40 °C water bath. The reaction was moni-
NRc
NRc
tored by TLC.
15
16
Ph
Ph
60
b
O
Isolated yield.
c
2-ClC6H4
10 h
NP: no pure product was isolated.
a
Reaction conditions: indium 1.0 mmol, ArCHO 1.0 mmol, allyl bromide
1.5 mmol, (R1CO)2O 1.2 mmol, THF 2 ml, 40 °C water bath. The reaction was mon-
itored by TLC.
systems, however, although they reacted and disappeared in long-
er time monitored by TLC, the homoallyl alcohol esters could not
be isolated because the products were very complex and included
several byproducts, such as long chain alkanes, alkyl bromide, and
homoallyl ether(Table 1, entries 10–13). The details are under
investigation.
b
Isolated yield.
NR: almost no reaction was proceeded.
c
excellent yields, short reaction times, no use of catalysts and dehy-
drants, and no separation of intermediates, which might be used in
the scale-up production of homoallyl alcohol esters in related med-
ical synthesis.
Similarly, the reactions of indium-mediated one-pot synthesis
of homoallyl esters were also conducted by using acid anhydride
as acylation reagents. The results are summarized in Table 2. As de-
picted in Table 2, aliphatic acid anhydrides, such as acetic anhy-
dride and propionic anhydride, can react well with various
aromatic aldehydes and ally bromide to form the corresponding
homoally alcohol esters in excellent yields (91–96%) within about
1 h under the above optimized conditions (Table 2, entries 1–11).
With the same to the reaction of acyl chloride, aromatic aldehydes
carrying either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups
could be efficiently converted into the aimed products, and differ-
ent substituents have almost no effect on the result of the reaction.
It is surprising that heterocyclic aromatic aldehydes can also be
converted into the desired products by using aliphatic anhydrides
in excellent yields (Table 2, entries 12–14). In comparison with ali-
phatic acid anhydride, benzoic anhydride almost couldn’t react
even if the reaction time was elongated to 10 h, which might be
due to large steric hindrance (Table 2, entries 15 and 16).
In summary, a new and efficient method for the synthesis of
homoallyl alcohol esters through indium-mediated one-pot three
component tandem reaction of aromatic aldehydes, acylation re-
agents, and allyl bromide in short reaction time in excellent yields
is described. The primary investigation on this reaction shows that
the allylation of aldehydes and the esterification of the aforemen-
tioned in situ-formed homoallyl alcohols are completed simulta-
neously. It is noted that aliphatic aldehydes and heterocyclic
aromatic aldehydes have a lower reactivity than aromatic alde-
hydes, and aromatic acylation reagents have larger steric hin-
drance than that of aliphatic ones. The advantages of this method
include the use of easy to handle, stable nontoxic metal indium,
Acknowledgments
Financial support by Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
20702042), Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials of Gansu Province
(No. zd-06-18) and Yong Teachers Research Foundation of NWNU
(No. NWNU-QN-06-27) is acknowledged.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Marshall, J. A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 31–48.
2. McCluskey, A.; Mayer, D. M.; Young, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5217–5218.
3. Komatsu, N.; Uda, M.; Suzuki, H.; Takahashi, T.; Domae, T.; Wada, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7215–7218.
4. Yadav, J. S.; Subba Reddy, B. V.; Srihari, P. Synlett 2001, 673–675.
5. (a) Wieland, L. C.; Zerth, H. M.; Mohan, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4597–
4600; (b) Anzalone, P. W.; Baru, A. R.; Danielson, E. M.; Hayes, P. D.; Nguyen, M.
P.; Panico, A. F.; Smith, R. C.; Mohan, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2091–2096.
6. Yadav, J. S.; Subba Reddy, B. V.; Vishnumurthy, P.; Chary, Ch. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 5915–5918.
7. Cahiez, G.; Chavant, P. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 7373–7376.
8. (a) Rieke, R. D.; Hanson, M. V. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 1925–1956; (b) Li, C. J.;
Chan, T. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 55, 11149–11176; (c) Nair, V.; Ros, S.; Jayan,
C. N.; Pillai, B. S. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1959–1982.
9. (a) Li, C. J.; Chan, T. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 7017–7020; (b) Hu, L. H.; Ji, S.
J. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 28, 1107–1110.
10. Gregg, B. T.; Golden, K. C.; Quinn, J. F. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3287–3295.