1490
Z. Rankovic et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1488–1490
of up to 10 lM. However, poor chemical and plasma stability (hu-
man and rat t1/2 <5 min) which proved to be intrinsic to this chem-
otype prevented further progression of compounds in this series.
LCMS studies identified the nitrile hydrolysis to corresponding pri-
mary amide as the major route of degradation in plasma.
In summary, a novel non-peptidic dioxo-triazine seriesof cathep-
sin K inhibitors was identified from HTS. Potent and highly selective
inhibitors were identified, that is, compound 24 displayed IC50 val-
ues of 17 nM in catK and >10,000 nM in catL, catB and catS assays.
Intrinsically poor chemical and plasma stability precluded further
progression of this series. However, the discovery of new S2 pocket
bindinggroups as well as the SAR and biostructural informationgen-
erated around this chemotype proved invaluable in the design of no-
vel cathepsin K inhibitors with excellent pharamacokinetic profile,
as we describe in the following article in this issue.
Acknowledgements
Figure 1. Co-crystal structure of dioxo-triazine 24 with cathepsin K (2 Å resolution;
PDB entry 3KWB). The 3-CF3-phenyl group is bound to the hydrophobic S2 pocket,
whereas the propyl-pyperidine interacts with the enzyme prime side largely
exposed to solvent. The core N1 atom forms a hydrogen bond with the conserved
water in the S1 pocket (key interactions with water molecules are indicated with
dashed yellow lines).
We thank Han Kok and Wim Koot for running fermentors to
produce CatK protein.
References and notes
(IC50 = 1000 nM), further extension of the linker proved not to be
beneficial for cathepsin K potency (22, IC50 = 4460 nM). Most grati-
fyingly, incorporation of dimethylamine group led to a 20-fold in-
crease in potency (23, IC50 = 100 nM). Another fivefold improve
ment was achieved by replacing the dimethylamine with a piperi-
dine group in 24 (IC50 = 17 nM). The n-propyl spacer was found to
be optimal, as demonstrated by around 8–10-fold loss in potency
of ethyl-linked analogues 25 and 26. More polar amines such as mor-
pholine 27 displayed uniformly lower potency in comparison to 24.
Interestingly, combinations of the best R and R1 groups were not
additive. For example, in contrast to the profound effect observed in
the 3-CF3-phenyl series, incorporation of an amine group into cyclo-
heptyl 13 or 3-isopropy-phenyl 6 analogues was either deleterious
(28–30)11 or neutral (31) with respect to catK potency.
Considering the structural novelty of this chemotype we were
pleased to be able to obtain a high resolution X-ray structure of
inhibitor 24 bound in the active site of cathepsin K (Fig. 1). The struc-
ture showed that a covalent thioamidate bond is formed between
the nitrile and Cys25, similarly to previously reported aliphatic ni-
trile inhibitors (PDB structure 2F7D). C5 Carbonyl group of the di-
oxo-triazine core forms a hydrogen bond with an extensive water
network in the prime side, whilst the other carbonyl moiety is ex-
posed to solvent. A conserved water molecule in the S1 pocket forms
a bridge between the NH of Gly 66 and a N1 atom of the dioxo-tri-
azine core. The aryl ring binds into the unprime side of the active site,
with the CF3 group deeply buried into the hydrophobic S2 pocket,
formed by the side chains of Tyr67, Met68, Ala134, Ala163 and
Leu209 (papain numbering). The S2 pocket, the only true binding
pocket within a relatively shallow active site of cathepsin K, is the
primary determinant of enzyme specificity which favours small
hydrophobic groups.5 This could rationalise the observed preference
for small hydrophobic aryl or cyclic aliphatic rings in N2 position of
the dioxo-triazine core (Table 1). The propyl-piperidine moiety
binds in the prime side, and makes a number of hydrophobic con-
tacts in the S20/S30, as well as an interaction with a conserved water
in the S10 pocket. The piperidine amino group is at 3.9 Å distance to a
conserved water in S10 pocket, indicating possibility of a weak
interaction.
1. (a) Bonnick, S. L. Clin. Cornerstone 2006, 8, 28; (b) Rosen, C. J.; Klibanski, A. Am. J.
Med. 2009, 122, 409.
2. Troen, B. R. Drug News Perspect. 2004, 17, 19.
3. Hou, W. S.; Bromme, D.; Zhao, Y.; Mehler, E.; Dushey, C.; Weinstein, H.; Miranda,
C. S.; Fraga, C.; Greig, F.; Carey, J.; Rimoin, D. L.; Desnick, R. J.; Gelb, B. D. J. Clin.
Invest. 1999, 103, 731.
4. Berti, P. J.; Storer, A. C. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 246, 273.
5. (a) Cai, J.; Jamieson, C.; Moir, J.; Rankovic, Z. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2005, 15, 33;
(b) Deal, C. Curr. Opin. Rheum. 2009, 21, 380; (c) Grabowska, U. B.; Chambers, T.
J.; Shiroo, M. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2005, 8, 619.
6. Lark, M. W.; Stroup, G. B.; James, I. E.; Dodds, R. A.; Hwang, S. M.; Blake, S. M.;
Lechowska, B. A.; Hoffman, S. J.; Smith, B. R.; Kapadia, R.; Liang, X.; Erhard, K.;
Ru, Y.; Dong, X.; Marquis, R. W.; Veber, D.; Gowen, M. Bone 2002, 30, 746.
7. (a) Kumar, S.; Dare, L.; Vasko-Moser, J. A.; James, I. E.; Blake, S. M.; Rickard, D. J.;
Hwang, S.-M.; Tomaszek, T.; Yamashita, D. S.; Marquis, R. W.; Oh, H.; Jeong, J.
U.; Veber, D. F.; Gowen, M.; Lark, M. W.; Stroup, G. Bone 2007, 40, 12; (b)
Stroup, G. B.; Lark, M. W.; Veber, D. F.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Blake, S.; Dare, L.;
Erhard, K. F.; Hoffman, S. J.; James, I. E.; Marquis, R. W.; Ru, Y.; Vasko-Moser, J.
A.; Smith, B. R.; Tomaszek, T.; Gowen, M. Bone Min. Res. 2001, 16, 1739.
8. (a) Adami, S.; Supronik, J.; Hala, T.; Brown, J. P.; Garnero, P.; Haemmerle, S.;
Ortmann, C. E.; Bouisset, F.; Trechsel, U. J. Bone Min. Res. 2006, 21, S24; (b) Stoch, S.
A.; Zajic, S.; Stone, J.; Miller, D. L.; Van Dyck, K.; Gutierrez, M. J.; De Decker, M.; Liu,
L.; Liu, Q.; Scott, B. B.; Panebianco, D.; Jin, B.; Duong, L. T.; Gottesdiener, K.;
Wagner, J. A. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 86, 175.
9. Subsequently, two research groups disclosed in the literature structurally
related cathepsin K inhibitors: (a) Altmann, E.; Cowan-Jacob, S. W.; Missbach,
M. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5833; (b) Morley, A. D.; Kenny, P. W.; Burton, B.;
Heald, R. A.; MacFaul, P. A.; Mullett, J.; Page, K.; Porres, S. S.; Ribeiro, L. R.;
Smith, P.; Ward, S.; Wilkinson, T. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1658.
10. Cooper, C. B.; McFarland, J. W.; Blair, K. T.; Fontaine, E. H.; Jones, C. S.; Muzzi, M.
L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 835.
11. Synthesis of the cycloheptyl derivatives 28–30 is shown below:
CN
CN
O
O
i
N
N
HN
N
HN
NH
O
O
32
33
CN
O
N
ii
N
N
R1
O
28-30
Inhibitors in this series were generally found highly selective
over closely related anti targets such as cathepsins B and L, as well
as the less critical cathepsin S. For example, compounds 24–26
were shown inactive in catB, catL and catS assays at concentrations
Reagents and conditions: (i) KHCO3, c-heptylBr, KI, DMSO, 70 °C, 2.5 h; (ii) NaH, R1Br,
KI, DMSO, 70 °C, 1 h.