Since the Hoveyda group reported the first total synthesis
of fluvirucinine B1,3a inspirations of the synthetic community
due to the unique structures and excellent biological activities
of fluvirucins have led to notable endeavors to facilitate their
total synthesis.3,4a
Scheme 2. Stereoselective Synthesis of (E)-Enol TBS Ether 12
Since we reported the first asymmetric total synthesis of
fluvirucinine A1,4a we have been interested in iterative ring-
expansion strategies (Scheme 1) as one of the most efficient
Scheme 1. Retrosynthesis of Fluvirucinine A2
the first ACR as reported.4a Amide enolate induced aza-
Claisen rearrangement of 5, prepared from lactam 6 via direct
stereoselective vinylation, afforded the ring-expanded lactam
7 as a sole product possessing the second requisite stereo-
genic center corresponding to C6 of fluvirucinine A2. The
10-membered lactam 4 was obtained by olefin hydrogenation
of 7 and subsequent Boc-protection. Taking advantage of
our recent protocol via an N,O-acetal TMS ether,6 we could
further provide the requisite allylazacycle 3, in spite of the
ring-opening propensity of medium or macrolactams. The
Boc-protected lactam 4 was partially reduced with DIBAL-
H, and then the resulting N,O-acetal was trapped with
subsequent addition of Py and TMSOTf to give the N,O-
acetal TMS ether 9. Upon BF3OEt2 treatment of N,O-acetal
TMS ether 9, highly stereoselective amidoalkylation was
achieved at a low temperature, and prolonged stirring at room
temperature allowed subsequent Boc-deprotection to give the
allylazacycle 3, with no detectable stereoisomer in high yield.
Expecting a chairlike transition state during the second ACR,
stereoselective (E)-enol ether formation was required to
facilitate the introduction of newly generated stereochemistry
at C3 as desired. Fortunately, silylation of the aldehyde,
obtained by oxidative cleavage of the corresponding R-al-
lylazacycle 10, under mild conditions (TBSCl, DBU, CH2Cl2,
reflux)7,4c resulted in the highly stereoselective formation of
the desired (E)-enol TMS ether 11 in an excellent yield, along
with a negligible amount of the corresponding (Z)-enol TMS
ether (>10:1).
approaches to the synthesis of macrolactam alkaloids. This
prominent ring-expansion strategy would provide (1) rapid
access to a variety of functionalized macrolactam skeletons
without an extra cyclization step, (2) concomitant stereose-
lective elaborations of the requisite stereogenic centers by a
distal asymmetric induction, and (3) entropic and enthalpic
advantages.5 As shown in Scheme 1, our unique strategy
takes full advantage of the initially introduced C10 chiral
center to control the relative stereochemistries of the remain-
ing remote stereogenic centers (C2, C3, and C6) through a
highly ordered ring expansion via an aza-Claisen rearrange-
ment (ACR). In particular, the second ACR (2 f 1) seems
to offer an attractive alternative to the conventional asym-
metric amide aldol reaction for elaboration of C2 and C3
stereogenic centers.
Shown in Scheme 2, our synthesis commenced with
preparation of the 10-membered lactam 4 from lactam 6 by
(3) (a) Houri, A. F.; Xu, Z.; Cogan, D. A.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 2943. (b) Xu, Z.; Johannes, C. W.; Salman, S. S.; Hoveyda,
A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10926. (c) Trost, B. M.; Ceschi, M. A.;
Konig, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 1486. (d) Martin, M.; Mas, G.;
Upri, F.; Vilarrasa, J. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3274; Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1999, 38, 3086. (e) Liang, B.; Negishi, E. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 193. (f)
With a reliable protocol established for the synthesis of
functionalized macrolactams, we turned our attention to the
second ACR. A variety of ACR precursors were investigated
Son, S.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2756
.
(4) (a) Suh, Y.-G.; Kim, S.-A.; Jung, J.-K.; Shin, D.-Y.; Min, K.-H.;
Koo, B.-A.; Kim, H.-S. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3753; Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3545. (b) Suh, Y.-G.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, S.-A.; Jung, J.-K.
Synth. Commun. 1996, 26, 1675. (c) Paek, S.-M.; Kim, N.-J.; Shin, D.;
Jung, J.-K.; Jung, J.-W.; Chang, D.-J.; Moon, H.; Suh, Y.-G. Chem.sEur.
(6) (a) Suh, Y.-G.; Kim, S.-H.; Jung, J.-K.; Shin, D.-Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2002, 43, 3165. (b) Suh, Y.-G.; Shin, D.-Y.; Jung, J.-K.; Kim, S.-H.
Chem. Commun. 2002, 1064. (c) Shin, D.-Y.; Jung, J.-K.; Seo, S.-Y.; Lee,
Y.-S.; Paek, S.-M.; Chung, Y. K.; Shin, D. M.; Suh, Y.-G. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 3635. (d) Jung, J.-W.; Shin, D.-Y.; Seo, S.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Paek, S.-M.;
Jung, J.-K.; Suh, Y.-G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 573.
2010)
.
(7) Taniguchi, Y.; Inanaga, J.; Yamaguchi, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
30. 1981, 54, 3229.
(5) Martin Castro, A. M. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 2939.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
2041