1162
M. I. EL-GAMAL AND C.-H. OH
O
Ar
H
NH2
N
N
N
N
NO2
H2N
H2N
N
b
a
N
H
H
N
O
N
N
1l,m
6a,b
8a,b
c
H
N
N
H2N
Ar
N
O
1n-r
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) SnCl2.H2O, EtOH, reflux, 4 h; (b) aryl isocyanate, THF, rt, overnight; (c) benzoic acid derivative, HOBt, EDCI, TEA, DMF,
80 ꢀC, 12h.
Biology
Compound 1r was tested against a panel of 40 kinases includ-
ing FMS. The inhibition percentages at 1 mM concentration are
summarised in Table 2. It showed selectivity against FMS kinase
with 81% inhibition. Its inhibition percentages against FLT3
(D835Y) and c-MET kinases were 42% and 40%, respectively. So its
IC50 values against both of them will be in micromolar scale.
Compared with its IC50 values against FMS kinase (30 nM, Table 1),
it can be concluded that compound 1r is more than 33 times
more selective towards FMS than the other kinases. The inhibition
percentages exerted by compound 1r against the other 37 tested
kinases were less than 28%.
Kinase screening results and discussion
Compounds 1a–r were tested in a 10-dose testing mode starting
with 81 mM, threefold serial dilutions, against FMS kinase in a cell-
free enzyme assay. The IC50 values are summarised in Table 1.
Upon comparing the structures and potencies, it was found that
compounds 1c, 1e, and 1g possessing benzamido moiety at pos-
ition 4 of the pyrrolopyridine nucleus were more potent than the
corresponding primary amino analogues 1 l, 1m, and 1o. This can
be due to occupancy of a hydrophobic pocket with that add-
itional benzoyl moiety and/or formation of additional hydrogen
bond by the carbonyl oxygen. On the contrary, the amino ana-
logues 1p and 1r were more potent than the corresponding ben-
zamido derivatives 1j and KIST101029.
The central phenyl ring attached to N1 atom of the pyrrolopyri-
dine nucleus was para-disubstituted in some derivatives or meta-
disubstituted in others. The results showed that para-disubstituted
compounds 1a, 1c, and 1h were more potent than the corre-
sponding meta-disubstituted derivatives 1b, 1d, and 1i. On the
other hand, the meta-disubstituted compounds 1g, 1o, and 1r
showed stronger inhibitory effect against FMS kinase than the
para-disubstituted positional isomers 1f, 1n, and 1p. These differ-
ences in the substitution position can affect proper orientation
and fitting at the active site.
The urea derivatives 1a, 1b, 1e, and 1m were generally more
potent than the corresponding analogues with amide linker 1h,
1i, 1k, and 1q. The urea linker is longer and can be optimal for
best fitting at the binding site. The urea spacer contains also add-
itional NH, compared with the amide. This terminal NH could con-
tribute to stronger affinity by additional hydrogen bonding. Any
or both of these effects can account for stronger enzyme inhib-
ition effect of the urea derivatives.
Upon investigating the terminal aryl ring effect on the activity,
it was found that 30,50-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl and 40-morpho-
lino-30-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl are the best rings in diarylureas and
diarylamides, respectively. These rings may contribute to stronger
affinity with the enzyme. The morpholino moiety is also a polar
ring, which enhances the solvent exposure and aqueous solubility
of the molecule.
Cell-based biological assays of compounds 1r and KIST101029
Due to over-expression of FMS kinase in certain types of tumours
such as ovarian3, prostate4, and breast5–7 cancers, we decided to
test the antiproliferative activity of compound 1r against a panel
of six ovarian, two prostate, and five breast cancer cell lines. It
was also tested against HS 27 fibroblasts in order to investigate
the selectivity indexes. The results were compared with those of
KIST101029 as a reference standard. The IC50 values are pre-
sented in Table 3, and the dose-response curves of compound 1r
are shown in Figure 2.
At 10 mM concentration, compound 1r was more active than
KIST101029 against four ovarian, two prostate, and two breast
than KIST101029 against HS 578 T breast cancer cell line. TGI val-
ues reflect the efficacy of the molecule. Compound 1r was more
efficacious than KIST101029 against MCF7, MDA-MB-231/ATCC,
and HS 578 T breast cancer cell lines. But in general, KIST101029
was more potent than 1r against most of the tested cell lines. The
structural difference, benzamido in KIST101029 compared with
amino in 1r, is responsible for this potency difference. The benza-
mido moiety is more hydrophobic and is expected to allow
greater ability of the molecule to cross the cell membrane to
inside the cell. So the exposure of the intracellular components to
compound KIST101029 is expected to be higher. Furthermore,
the benzamido moiety may form additional interactions with the
receptor site, which can contribute to stronger affinity and
potency. However, the IC50 values of compound 1r were in the
range of 0.15–1.78 mM, which is an excellent range of potency. In
addition, compound 1r has another merit over KIST101029. Its
IC50 value against HS 27 fibroblasts was higher, i.e. greater select-
ivity towards cancer cells than normal cells. Upon dividing its IC50
value against HS 27 fibroblasts by IC50 range over cancer cells, we
find that the selectivity range of compound 1r ranges from 3.21
to 38.13 times towards cancer cells than normal cells.
Among all the tested compounds, 1e and 1r were more potent
than the lead compound KIST101029. Their potencies were 1.6
and 3.2 times, respectively, higher than that of KIST101029.
Compound 1r possessing primary amino, meta-disubstituted cen-
tral phenyl, amide linker, and 40-morpholino-30-(trifluoromethyl)-
phenyl terminal ring was the most potent among this series of
compounds. So we decided to consider it for further biological
investigations.