R. Tester et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2560–2563
2563
with different amines.26 The parent structures for this SAR were
compounds 8e and 8l.
As shown in Table 3, replacing the (S)-a-methyl benzyl group
impacted not only CYP3A4 activity, but also enzymatic and cellular
15. Hynes, J., Jr.; Leftheris, K. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 967.
16. Goldstein, D. M.; Gabriel, T. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 1017.
17. Dominguez, C.; Powers, D. A.; Tamayo, N. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2005, 4,
421.
18. Wagner, G.; Laufer, S. Med. Res. Rev. 2006, 26, 1.
19. Luedtke, G. R.; Schinzel, K.; Tan, X.; Tester, R. W.; Nashashibi, I.; Xu, Y.-j.; Dugar,
activity. Of the modifications shown, only a 2-propyl alternative
maintained p38a activity while reducing CYP3A4 activity by up
20. Docking studies were conducted using a high-resolution p38a X-ray structure
of p38 (PDB ID: 1ove). The extra-precision mode of Glide, a ligand-receptor
a
to two orders of magnitude compared to the enzymatic activity.
In the case of parent compound 8l, (S)-2-(1-methoxy)propyl was
also well tolerated.
In summary, high throughput screening identified N-pyridyl
amides as novel inhibitors of p38a. Through subsequent SAR stud-
ies, both enzymatic and cellular activities were optimized (com-
pounds 8e and 8l). Improved enzymatic activity is believed due
to optimal occupation of hydrophobic pockets and introduction
of additional hydrogen bonding interactions. Additional SAR pro-
duced structures with improved CYP profiles. These compounds
(analogs 9a, 10a, and 10c) were targeted as candidates for further
development.
docking tool from Schrodinger, LLC, was used to generate a number of poses for
analogs 3, 8e, and 8l, which were further filtered by visual inspection.
21. Mavunkel, B. J.; Perumattam, J. J.; Tan, X.; Luedtke, G. R.; Lu, Q.; Lim, D.; Kizer,
D.; Dugar, S.; Chakravarty, S.; Xu, Y.-j.; Jung, J.; Liclican, A.; Levy, D. E.; Tabora, J.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1059.
22. The LPS/TNF
a Human Whole Blood Assay was run as described in Mavunkel,
B.; Dugar, S.; Luedtke, G.; Tan, X.; McEnroe, G. U.S. patent 6,696,443, 2004.
23. Davies, S. P.; Reddy, H.; Caivano, M.; Cohen, P. Biochem. J. 2000, 351, 95.
24. Wang, Z.; Canagarajah, B. J.; Boehm, J. C.; Kassisa, S.; Cobb, M. H.; Young, P. R.;
Abdel-Meguid, S.; Adams, J. L.; Goldsmith, E. J. Structure 1998, 6, 1117.
25. Lisnock, J.; Tebben, A.; Frantz, B.; O’Neill, E. A.; Croft, G.; O’Keefe, S. J.; Li, B.;
Hacker, C.; De Laszlo, S.; Smith, A.; Libby, B.; Liverton, N.; Hermes, J.; LoGrasso,
P. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 16573.
26. Tester, R.; Tan, X.; Schinzel, K.; Nashashibi, I.; Luedtke, G. R.; Liang, W.; Jung, J.;
Goehring, R. R.; Dugar, S.; Do, S. US 2006/199821, 2006.
27. CYP3A4 assay procedure: compounds were diluted from DMSO stocks to 40 lM
in cofactors/serial dilution buffer (0.05 M potassium phosphate, 2 mg/mL
NADP+, 2 mg/mL glucose-6-phosphate, 1.3 mg/mL magnesium chloride
hexahydrate, 0.8 U/mL glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase), for example,
References and notes
1. Han, J.; Lee, J.-D.; Bibbs, S. L.; Ulevitch, R. J. Science 1994, 265, 808.
2. Lee, J. C.; Kassis, S.; Kumar, S.; Badger, A.; Adams, J. L. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 82,
389.
3. Foster, M. L.; Halley, F.; Souness, J. E. Drug News Perspect. 2000, 13, 488.
4. Pargellis, C.; Regan, J. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 4, 566.
5. Smith, R. J. Drug Discovery Today 2005, 10, 1598.
2
l
L 10 mM stock into 500
pipette 0.1 mL of cofactors/serial dilution buffer + 0.4% DMSO were dispensed
into the wells in columns 2–12. The diluted test compounds (150 L) or
positive control were added to the desired well in column 1. With
multichannel pipette, 0.05 mL from the wells in column was serially
lL = 40 lM in 0.4% DMSO. With a multichannel
l
a
1
diluted to the wells in columns 2 through 8. The solution was mixed by
pipetting 3–5 times in each well. The remaining 0.05 mL in the wells in column
8 was removed and discarded. A lid was placed on the plate and it was put at
37 °C in an incubator for at least 10 min. With a multichannel pipette, 0.1 mL
enzyme/substrate mix (100 pmol CYP3A4+OR+b5 Supersomes™, 50 mM 7-
benzyloxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)-coumarin, 0.5 M potassium phosphate) was
dispensed to columns 1 through 11. The liquid was dispensed in a stream to
facilitate mixing. The lid was replaced and incubation continued at 37 °C for
6. Badger, A. M.; Bradbeer, J. N.; Votta, B.; Lee, J. C.; Adams, J. L.; Griswold, D. E. J.
Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 279, 1453.
7. Kubota, T.; Miyagishima, M.; Alvarez, R. J.; Kormos, R.; Rosenblum, W. D.;
Demetris, A. J.; Semigran, M. J.; Dec, G. W.; Holubkov, R.; McTiernan, C. F.;
Mann, D. L.; Feldman, A. M.; McNamara, D. M. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2000, 19,
819.
8. Sticherling, M. Drug Discovery Today: Dis. Mech. 2005, 2, 275.
9. Herlaar, E.; Brown, Z. Mol. Med. Today 1999, 5, 439.
10. Lee, J. C.; Kumar, S.; Griswold, D. E.; Underwood, D. C.; Votta, B. J.; Adams, J. L.
Immunopharmacology 2000, 47, 185.
11. Kumar, S.; Boehm, J.; Lee, J. C. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2003, 2, 717.
12. Saklatvala, J. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2004, 4, 372–377.
13. Ashwell, J. D. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 33, 1447.
30 min. With
a miltichannel pipette, 0.075 mL of STOP solution (80%
acetonitrile/20% 0.5 M tris base) was dispensed to all wells. Dispense the
liquid in a stream to facilitate mixing. The enzyme/substrate mix (0.1 mL) was
dispensed to the wells in column 12 and the plate was scanned with a
fluorescent plate scanner (Perkin Elmer LS50B—excitation filter 409 nM,
emission filter 530 nM).
14. Diller, D. J.; Lin, T. H.; Metzger, A. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2005, 5, 953.