peri-functionalization approach utilizing trialkylsilylethynyl
groups has been widely used to develop organic electronic
materials.11 The improved solubility, stability, and induced
π-stacking of pentacene derivatives have paved the way for
the synthesis of stable and soluble higher acenes.12 However,
in order to stabilize these highly reactive materials, signifi-
cantly bulkier substituents had to be used to prevent
Diels-Alder reaction between the alkyne substituent of one
molecule and the reactive acene chromophore of another.13
Hence bulky tri-tert-butylsiliylethynyl (TTBS) groups were
used to stabilize hexacene, whereas for heptacene, a larger
tris(trimethylsilyl)silylethynyl (TTMSS) substituent had to
be employed. In a recent report, Wudl and co-workers have
reported the synthesis of a stable tetraphenyl heptacene
derivative using a tri-isopropylsilylethynyl substituent. The
phenyl groups are effective in preventing the aromatic cores
from reacting with each other or with the alkyne, and as a
result the smaller alkyne substituent could be used.14
Photoxidation of the aromatic core was reported to be the
major decomposition process for this heptacene derivative.
Although TTBS hexacene exhibits reasonable stability in
solution, the poor solubility in solvents such as toluene and
chlorobenzene has prevented the measurement of its transport
properties in organic thin film transistors (OTFTs). A major
objective of the present work is to facilitate study of these
materials by improving the solubility and π-stacking of these
peri-functionalized hexacenes by changing the alkyl substit-
uents on silicon. Concurrently, we planned to study the
decomposition pathways of these molecules, both in solution
and the solid state, to gain a better understanding of reactivity
for the design of effective functionalization strategies.
For our studies, we surveyed a variety of branched alkyl-
or cycloalkyl-substituted silyl acetylene substituents, such
as tri-isobutylsilylethynyl (TIBS), tricyclopentylsilylethynyl
(TCPS), tricyclohexylsilylethynyl (TCHS), and TTMSS.
6,15-Hexacenequinone (1) was converted to a series of
diethynyl diols (2) by treatment with excess acetylide. The
resulting diols were then converted to the desired hexacenes
by treatment with a saturated solution of tin(II) chloride in
10% HCl. Purification of the crude hexacenes by silica gel
chromatography followed by recrystallization gave dark
green hexacene crystals in yields ranging from 8% to 36%,
depending on the substituent. Compared to phenyl-substituted
hexacenes,10a these materials exhibit significant persistence
both in solution and the solid state. These materials showed
higher solubility than the TTBS derivative, and all of them
could be prepared as 1 wt % solutions in toluene.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 6,15-Bis(trialkylsilylethynyl)hexacene
(3b) exhibited a two-dimensional π-stacking motif with a
close contact of 3.42 Å between the aromatic faces (Figure
1). By changing the substituent to the smaller TIBS group
(3a) the π-stacking motif changed to a one-dimensional
sandwich herringbone packing, and larger TCHS or TTMSS
substituents (3c) or (3d) led to one-dimensional π-stacked
arrangements with close contacts of 3.3 and 3.36 Å respec-
tively (Figure 1). The change in packing motif with the size
of the trialkylsilyl substituent is in accordance with the
functionalization model developed for controlling π-stacking
in pentacene.11a All of these hexacene derivatives exhibit
significant bending of alkyne substituents (CAr-Csp-Csp
≈
176-178° and Csp-Csp-Si ≈ 169-179°) induced by crystal
packing effects. However, the distortion is not as dramatic
as seen with TTBS hexacene (CAr-Csp-Csp ≈ 176° and 173°
and Csp-Csp-Si ) 169° and 174°) and is typical of alkynes
having large substituents.11a,12,13 Another important observa-
tion is the twisting of the acene core (torsion angle 13.4°)
of TCHS hexacene (3c) in comparison to all other derivatives
(<5°), which likely arises to alleviate strain in crystal packing
due to the bulky cyclohexyl substituents.
Our study of the decomposition pathways of hexacenes
began during the recrystallization of TIBS hexacene 3a under
ambient laboratory lighting, where a small amount of yellow
crystals formed along with the green hexacene. Single-crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis of this byproduct showed that this
compound was a symmetrical dimer formed between the
reactive C7 and C14 carbons of two hexacene molecules (4,
Figure 2). Unlike the two dimer products proposed for TIPS
pentacene decomposition,15 only the centrosymmetric dimer
product was observed, as the planosymmetric product is
significantly more sterically hindered.
The dark green crystals of these compounds obtained from
recrystallization were suitable for single-crystal X-ray dif-
fraction analysis. Like TTBS hexacene,12 TCPS hexacene
(11) (a) Anthony, J. E.; Eaton, D. L.; Parkin, S. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4,
15. (b) Miao, S.; Smith, M. D.; Bunz, U. H. F. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 757. (c)
Tang, M. L.; Reichardt, A. D.; Siegrist, T.; Mannsfeld, S. C. B.; Bao, Z.
Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 4669.
(12) Payne, M. M.; Parkin, S. R.; Anthony, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 8028.
When pure crystals of TIBS hexacene were kept in air in
the dark, they slowly (∼1 month) turned from crystalline
(13) Payne, M. M.; Odom, S. A.; Parkin, S. R.; Anthony, J. E. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 3325.
(14) Chun, D.; Cheng, Y.; Wudl, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
8380.
(15) Coppo, P.; Yeates, S. G. AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 3001.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
2061