Article
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, Vol. 53, No. 10 3971
Devices SpectraMax 384 Plus plate reader. Five replicates of each
compound were added at 10 different concentrations ranging
from 100 μM to 5 nM in a 96-well plate. Each plate contained
internal positive (known cytotoxic compound at 100 μM) and
negative (DMSO vehicle) controls for calibration of the percen-
tage of cell death observed in each well, which were used to
construct a dose-response curve and to calculate an IC50 by
fitting the data to a four-parameter logistic curve of the equation
y = (A - D)/[1 þ (x/C)B] þ D.
Acknowledgment. We thank Professor Russell J. Mumper
(University of North Carolina) for the generous gift of HL-60
and HL-60/VCR cell lines, and Professor Timothy Mitchison
(Harvard Medical School) for the generous gift of soluble
bovine brain tubulin. This work was supported by the Uni-
versity of Illinois. B.J.L. acknowledges The American Che-
mical Society, Division of Medicinal Chemistry, for an ACS
MEDI graduate fellowship.
Tubulin Polymerization Assay. Polymerization of tubulin was
monitored by measuring absorbance at 340 nm in a 384-well
plate Molecular Devices Spectramax 384 Plus spectrophoto-
meter (Sunnydale, CA) preheated to 37 °C. To a 0.5 mL
polypropylene tube on ice was added 40 μL of ice-cold
1.25ꢀ BRB-80 buffer (100 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 1.25 mM MgCl2,
1.25 mM EGTA, 1.25 μM GTP (added from 100 mM stock
immediately before use), 6.25% v/v glycerol). To individual
aliquots of buffer was also added DMSO or compound in
DMSO (DMSO 0.6% final in buffer, paclitaxel, and noco-
dazole were used at final concentrations of 10 μM, 8H at 25
and 100 μM). To this solution was rapidly added 10 μL of
15 mg/mL polymerization-competent tubulin in ice-cold
500 mM K-PIPES, pH 6.8, 0.5 mM MgCl2, buffer, which had
been thawed on ice immediately before use. Solutions were mixed
rapidly on ice and then immediately transferred to a 384-well
plate. Final concentrations of reagentsin polymerization reaction
were as follows: 80 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM
EGTA, 1.0 μM GTP, 5% glycerol, 0.5% DMSO, 3 mg/mL
tubulin. Turbidity at 340 nm corresponding to polymerization
was assessed every minute for 60 min.
Laser Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy. For laser fluores-
cence confocal microscopy, HeLa cells were grown on nitric
acid-washed no. 1 coverslips overnight in a 5% CO2 incubator h
at 37 °C. Compound in DMSO or DMSO vehicle alone (0.2%
DMSO final) was added to the cells at 40% or 70% confluency
and further incubated for 6 h (70% confluent cells) or 16 h (40%
confluent cells). Cells were washed briefly with BRB-80 and
fixed for 10 min with 0.5% glutaraldehyde in BRB-80, then
permeabilized for 15 min in 1% Triton X-100 in PBS. After
washing three times in PBS, pH 8.0, unreacted aldehydes were
reduced with three 7 min incubations of 1 mg/mL NaBH4
dissolved in PBS, pH 8, immediately before use. Cells were given
three rinses with a solution of 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, pH 8.0
(PBST), and blocked 20 min in 10% goat serum. FITC-
conjugated anti-R-tubulin was added at a 1:100 dilution in
10% goat serum, and the cells were incubated for 1 h, then
washed 3 ꢀ 10 min in PBST. Goat antimouse IgG/Alexa-Fluor
488 conjugate was diluted 1:200 in 10% goat serum and
incubated with cells for 1 h, then washed three times with PBST.
Cells were incubated in PBS containing 10 μg/mL propidium
iodide and 1 μg/mL RNase A for 15 min, washed twice with
PBS, once with H2O, and mounted onto microscope slides using
8 μL of Vectashield mounting medium and sealed with colorless
nail polish.45 Samples were visualized immediately on a Zeiss
LSM 510 laser scanning confocal microscope, 63ꢀ oil DIC
objective, 1.4 NA. Wide-field images were acquired by moving
the stage to 10-15 random locations on each slide, thereafter
only adjusting the stage in the z-direction to bring a maximal
number of cells into focus.
Supporting Information Available: Additional information on
materials and methods, including protocols for compound
synthesis, NMR spectra of all new compounds, and supporting
figures. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Jordan, M. A. Mechanism of action of antitumor drugs that
interact with microtubules and tubulin. Curr. Med. Chem.: Anti-
Cancer Agents 2002, 2, 1–17.
(2) Jordan, M. A.; Wilson, L. Microtubules as a target for anticancer
drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 253–265.
(3) Jordan, M. A.; Wilson, L. Microtubules and actin filaments:
dynamic targets for cancer chemotherapy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
1998, 10, 123–130.
(4) Giannakakou, P.; Sackett, D.; Fojo, T. Tubulin/microtubules: still
a promising target for new chemotherapeutic agents. J. Natl.
Cancer Inst. 2000, 92, 182–183.
(5) Mooberry, S. L.; Weiderhold, K. N.; Dakshanamurthy, S.; Hamel,
E.; Banner, E. J.; Kharlamova, A.; Hempel, J.; Gupton, J. T.;
Brown, M. L. Identification and characterization of a new tubulin-
binding tetrasubstituted brominated pyrrole. Mol. Pharmacol.
2007, 72, 132–140.
(6) Deeken, J. F.; Loscher, W. The blood-brain barrier and cancer:
transporters, treatment, and Trojan horses. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007,
13, 1663–1674.
(7) Dumontet, C.; Duran, G. E.; Steger, K. A.; Beketic-Oreskovic, L.;
Sikic, B. I. Resistance mechanisms in human sarcoma mutants
derived by single-step exposure to paclitaxel (Taxol). Cancer Res.
1996, 56, 1091–1097.
(8) Matesanz, R.; Barasoain, I.; Yang, C. G.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; de Ines,
C.; Coderch, C.; Gago, F.; Barbero, J. J.; Andreu, J. M.; Fang,
W. S.; Diaz, J. F. Optimization of taxane binding to microtubules:
binding affinity dissection and incremental construction of a high-
affinity analog of paclitaxel. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 573–585.
(9) Miller, D. S.; Bauer, B.; Hartz, A. M. S. Modulation of
P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: opportunities to im-
prove central nervous system pharmacotherapy. Pharmacol. Rev.
2008, 60, 196–209.
(10) Pellegrini, F.; Budman, D. R. Review: tubulin function, action of
antitubulin drugs, and new drug development. Cancer Invest. 2005,
23, 264–273.
(11) Rice, A.; Liu, Y.; Michaelis, M. L.; Himes, R. H.; Georg, G. I.;
Audus, K. L. Chemical modification of paclitaxel (Taxol) reduces
P-glycoprotein interactions and increases permeation across the
blood-brain barrier in vitro and in situ. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48,
832–838.
(12) Tong, Y.-G.; Zhang, X.-W.; Geng, M.-Y.; Yue, J.-M.; Xin, X.-L.;
Tian, F.; Shen, X.; Tong, L.-J.; Li, M.-H.; Zhang, C.; Li, W.-H.;
Lin, L.-P.; Ding, J. Pseudolarix acid B, a new tubulin-binding
agent, inhibits angiogenesis by interacting with a novel binding site
on tubulin. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006, 69, 1226–1233.
(13) Mulligan, J. M.; Greene, L. M.; Cloonan, S.; Mc Gee, M. M.;
Onnis, V.; Campiani, G.; Fattorusso, C.; Lawler, M.; Williams,
D. C.; Zisterer, D. M. Identification of tubulin as the molecular
target of proapoptotic pyrrolo-1,5-benzoxazepines. Mol. Pharma-
col. 2006, 70, 60–70.
(14) Beyer, C. F.; Zhang, N.; Hernandez, R.; Vitale, D.; Lucas, J.;
Nguyen, T.; Discafani, C.; Ayral-Kaloustian, S.; Gibbons, J. J.
TTI-237, a novel microtubule-active compound with in vivo anti-
tumor activity. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 2292–2300.
(15) Liberatore, A.-M.; Coulomb, H.; Pons, D.; Dutruel, O.; Kasprzyk,
P. G.; Carlson, M.; Nelson, A. S.; Newman, S. P.; Stengel, C.;
Auvray, P.; Hesry, V.; Foll, B.; Narboux, N.; Morlais, D.; Le
Moing, M.; Bernetiere, S.; Dellile, R.; Camara, J.; Ferrandis, E.;
Bigg, D. C.; Prevost, G. P. IRC-083927 is a new tubulin binder that
inhibits growth of human tumor cells resistant to standard tubulin-
binding agents. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 2426–2434.
In Silico Prediction of Biological Properties. SMILES formu-
las for all new compounds were generated in Chemdraw
(Cambridgesoft Corp., Cambridge, MA). SMILES formulas
for known antimitotics were downloaded from the PubChem
database.46 Values for calculated partition coefficient octanol/
water (ClogP) and topological polar surface area (TPSA) were
calculated using Daylight software (Daylight Chemical Infor-
mation Systems, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) which contains imple-
mentations of ClogP29 (BioByte Corp., Claremont, CA) and
TPSA30 algorithms. Predicted log BB was calculated using the
formula log BB = -0.0148 PSA þ 0.152 ClogP þ 0.139.29