trifluoroborate salts,11 trialkoxy or trihydroxyborate salts,12
diethanolamine adducts,13 sterically bulky boronic esters,14
and boroxines.15 Important advances with 2-heterocyclic
silanolates have also recently been reported.16 However, it
remains a challenge to develop air-stable and chemically pure
2-pyridyl building blocks.17
We recently reported that 2-heterocyclic N-methylimino-
diacetic acid (MIDA) boronates can serve as stable and
highly effective surrogates for a wide range of unstable
2-heterocyclic boronic acids under “slow-release” cross-
coupling conditions.3e We also discovered that 2-pyridyl
MIDA boronate 1a is the first air-stable 2-pyridyl borane
that can be isolated in chemically pure form and is a very
convenient cross-coupling partner under modified slow-
release conditions.3e However, our preliminary synthesis of
this building block was cumbersome, low yielding, and not
scalable.3e Given the broad potential utility of 2-heterocyclic
MIDA boronates for many diverse applications,4-9 we
pursued a practical, scalable, and general method for their
synthesis. Building on the surprising discovery that 2-pyridyl
MIDA boronate 1a is stable in anhydrous DMSO even at
130 °C, we herein report that a broad range of 2-pyridyl
and other challenging-to-access heterocyclic MIDA boronates
can be prepared from the corresponding readily available
bromides via a new method involving direct transligation of
trialkoxyborate salts with MIDA at elevated temperatures
(Figure 1).
Figure 1. New method that provides access to a wide range of
2-pyridyl and other difficult-to-access MIDA boronates from the
corresponding readily available bromides.
Lithium triisopropyl 2-pyridyl borate18 3 is known to be
a useful intermediate for preparing other boronic acid
surrogates10,13 and for cross-coupling with a range of aryl
halides.12a In preliminary studies, however, we were only
able to achieve a low yield of 1a from 3.3e For example, the
dropwise addition of a freshly prepared THF solution of 3
to a stirred suspension of MIDA in DMSO at 55 °C over
1 h (Figure 2A) resulted in a very low (∼10%) and poorly
reproducible yield of 1a (Figure 2B). A major byproduct
observed in this reaction was pyridine, suggesting that
protodeborylation of the notoriously labile 2-pyridyl-boron
bond was a predominant competing pathway.
(11) (a) Molander, G. A.; Ellis, N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 275–286.
(b) Darses, S.; Genet, J. P. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 288–325. (c) Stefani,
H. A.; Cella, R.; Vieira, A. S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3623–3658. (d)
Molander, G. A.; Biolatto, B. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4302–4314. (e)
Molander, G. A.; Canturk, B.; Kennedy, L. E. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
973–980.
(12) (a) Billingsley, K. L.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 4695–4698. (b) Yamamoto, Y.; Takizawa, M.; Yu, X. -Q.; Miyaura,
N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 928–931. (c) Cammidge, A. N.;
Goddard, V. H. M.; Gopee, H.; Harrison, N. L.; Hughes, D. L.; Schubert,
C. J.; Sutton, B. M.; Watts, G. L.; Whitehead, A. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
4071–4074. (d) O’Neill, B. T.; Yohannes, D.; Bundesmann, M. W.; Arnold,
E. P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4201–4204. (e) Sindkhedkar, M. D.; Mulla, H. R.;
Wurth, M. A.; Cammers-Goodwin, A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2991–2996.
(f) Fernando, S. R. L.; Maharoof, U. S. M.; Deshayes, K. D.; Kinstle, T. H.;
Ogawa, M. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5783–5790.
(13) (a) N-Phenyldiethanolamine 2-pyridylboronate is prepared as a
structurally undefined complex containing variable quantities of isopropyl
and N-phenyldiethanolamine groups and a stoichiometric quantity of lithium:
Hodgson, P. B.; Salingue, F. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 685–687. (b)
Jones, N. A.; Antoon, J. W.; Bowie, A. L.; Borak, J. B.; Stevens, E. P.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2007, 44, 363–367. (c) Solid-supported diethanolamine
adducts: Gravel, M.; Thompson, K. A.; Zak, M.; Be´rube´, C.; Hall, D. G. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3–15. (d) A solid-supported diethanolamine-bound
2-pyridyl reagent has also been reported: Gros, P.; Doudouh, A.; Fort, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6239–6241.
Figure 2. (A) Method for the preparation of 2-pyridyl MIDA
boronate 1a from 2a via the intermediacy of triisopropoxyborate
1
salt 3. (B) Yield of 1a (via H NMR, average of two runs) as a
function of the internal reaction temperature.
With the goal of minimizing this side reaction, we initially
explored a wide range of complexation conditions involving
milder temperatures. However, as shown in Figure 2B,
reducing the temperature always resulted in even lower yields
of 1a. Prompting us to reverse our approach, we discovered
in parallel studies that 1a is surprisingly stable in hot DMSO.
For example, heating a solution of 1a in d6-DMSO at 130
°C for one hour caused no change in the 1H NMR spectrum
(see Supporting Information (SI)), which suggested that the
undesired protodeborylation observed in the transligation
(14) (a) Yang, D. X.; Colletti, S. L.; Wu, K.; Song, M.; Li, G. Y.; Shen,
H. C. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 381–384. (c) Deng, J. Z.; Paone, D. V.; Ginnetti,
A. T.; Kurihara, H.; Dreher, S. D.; Weissman, S. A.; Stauffer, S. R.; Burgey,
C. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 345–347.
(15) (a) Perkins, J. R.; Carter, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3290–
3291. (b) Kerins, F.; O’Shea, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4968–4971.
(c) Cioffi, C. L.; Spencer, W. T.; Richards, J. J.; Herr, R. J. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 2210–2212.
(16) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Smith, R. C.; Chang, W. T.; Muhuhi, J. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3104–3118. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Baird, J. D.;
Regens, C. S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1440–1455. (c) Denmark, S. E.;
Baird, J. D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 793–795.
(17) 2-Pyridyl stannanes represent stable and effective alternatives, but
these reagents suffer from substantial toxicity: (a) Bailey, T. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 4407–4410. (b) Cragg, S. T. Patty’s Toxicology; Bingham,
E., Cohrssen, B., Powell, C. H., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2001.
(18) Mikhailov, B. M.; Kozminskaya, T. K. IzV. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Ser.
Khim. 1959, 76, 1866–67.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2315