C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
translocated by the SPI-1 T3SS, and maintains CPG2 activity after
secretion. It is important to note that while expression of SopE2-CPG2-
HA using a low copy plasmid provides a convenient readout of the
SPI-1 T3SS, chromosomal expression of SopE2-CPG2 and normaliza-
tion for CPG2 fusion will be required to accurately measure endog-
enous levels of type III protein secretion. Nonetheless, the visible
fluorescence detection of Glu-CyFur uncaging provides a very sensitive
assay for type III protein secretion in bacterial supernatants and infected
cell lysates.
Figure 3. (A and B) S. typhimurium strains were grown with varying doses
of INP0007 for 4 h. SopE2-CPG2-HA secretion and expression were
visualized by western blot and by Glu-CyFur uncaging. (C) T3SS inhibitors.
(D) Dose-dependent inhibition of SopE2-CPG2-HA secretion by T3SS
inhibitors. For all experiments equal volumes of bacterial growth media
were used and comparable bacteria growth was confirmed by measuring
optical density at 600 nm.
CPG2:Glu-CyFur reporter system in measuring differential inhibi-
tory activity of small molecules targeted at T3SSs.
Figure 2. (A) SopE2-CPG2-HA bacterial expression construct. (B) Western
blots for SopE2-CPG2-HA expression from concentrated growth media or
lysates of indicated strains. (C) Change in CyFur fluorescence over 2 h
when 10 µL of growth media from the indicated bacteria strains were added.
(D) Visualization of SopE2-CPG2-HA injection into HeLa cells. Cells were
infected for 30 min with S. typhimurium expressing SopE2-CPG2-HA and
stained with anti-HA antibodies (green) and TOPRO-3 reagent (blue). Scale
bars indicate 10 µm. (E) Glu-CyFur uncaging in S. typhimurium infected
HeLa cell lysates.
The CPG2:Glu-CyFur reporter system provides a robust and
sensitive method for monitoring protein expression and secretion.
This system is complementary and orthogonal to other enzyme
reporter systems such as luciferase and ꢀ-lactamase, making it
potentially useful for dual-imaging applications in the future.4,14
Cell-permeable versions of Glu-CyFur may also be useful for live
cell and in ViVo applications. Importantly, the CPG2:Glu-CyFur
system provides a simple and rapid means of evaluating cellular
factors that influence the secretion of protein toxins and effectors
as well as chemical inhibitors for antibiotic development.
To explore the sensitivity of the SopE2-CPG2-HA:Glu-CyFur
system, we evaluated the activity of reported bacterial T3SS inhibitors
with our assay. Salicylidene acylhydrazides (SAHs) such as INP0007
have been shown to block T3SS activity in several Gram-negative
bacterial pathogens,3 including S. typhimurium.11,12 To evaluate T3SS
inhibitors with the SopE2-CPG2-HA:Glu-CyFur system, S. typhimu-
rium was incubated with INP0007 at increasing concentrations and
SopE2-CPG2-HA secretion was measured. Western blot analysis of
SopE2-CPG2-HA expression and secretion suggests that INP0007
inhibits bacterial effector secretion at 25 µM without affecting protein
expression (Figure 3A). These results are consistent with previous
reports of INP0007 activity on proteins secreted by Salmonella using
coomassie blue staining,11,12 which we also independently confirmed
(Figure S3). Analysis of SopE2-CPG2-HA expression and secretion
measuring Glu-CyFur fluorescence suggests 5 µM of INP0007 already
significantly inhibits the secretion of SopE2 (Figure 3B) without
interfering with protein expression (Figure S4). The inhibitory activity
of INP0007 can also be visualized by the naked eye based on the change
in Glu-CyFur spectral properties after CPG2 uncaging (Figure 3A).
To investigate whether the SopE2-CPG2-HA:CyFur reporter
system could differentially measure the activity of T3SS inhibitors,
we evaluated an INP0007 analogue lacking the dibromophenol
motif (SAH-1, Figure 3C). Interestingly, SAH-1 showed no
inhibitory activity compared to INP0007, which suggests that the
dibromophenol motif of INP0007 is crucial for potent inhibition
of T3SSs (Figure 3D). INP0007 is ∼4 times more potent in blocking
SopE2-CPG2-HA secretion than another reported Gram-negative
bacteria protein secretion inhibitor, 2-imino-5-arylidene-thiazoli-
dinone (IAT),13 with IC50 values of 5.5 and 22.6 µM respectively
(Figure 3D). These experiments highlight the sensitivity of the
Acknowledgment. We thank Andreas J. Baumler (Univ. of Cal.,
Davis) for the ∆inVA strain. J.S.Y. is a postdoctoral fellow of the
Irving Institute Fellowship Program of the Cancer Research
Institute. P.D.D. thanks the Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering/Cornell Tri-
Institutional Program in Chemical Biology. H.C.H. acknowledges
support from Starr Cancer Consortium, Lerner Family, and NBC/
NIH/NIAID (2 U54 AI057158-06).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
supporting figures, and complete refs 7 and 10. This material is available
References
(1) Galan, J. E.; Wolf-Watz, H. Nature 2006, 444, 567.
(2) Haraga, A.; Ohlson, M. B.; Miller, S. I. Nat. ReV. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 53.
(3) Keyser, P.; Elofsson, M.; Rosell, S.; Wolf-Watz, H. J. Intern. Med. 2008,
264, 17.
(4) Ehsani, S.; Rodrigues, C. D.; Enninga, J. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 24.
(5) Hedley, D.; Ogilvie, L.; Springer, C. Nat. ReV. Cancer 2007, 7, 870.
(6) Lord, S. J.; Conley, N. R.; Lee, H. L.; Samuel, R.; Liu, N.; Twieg, R. J.;
Moerner, W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9204.
(7) Lord, S. J.; et al. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 55.
(8) Tsou, L. K.; Zhang, M. M.; Hang, H. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 5055.
(9) Patel, J. C.; Galan, J. E. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 175, 453.
(10) Raffatellu, M.; et al. Cell Host Microbe 2009, 5, 476.
(11) Negrea, A.; Bjur, E.; Ygberg, S. E.; Elofsson, M.; Wolf-Watz, H.; Rhen,
M. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 2867.
(12) Hudson, D. L.; Layton, A. N.; Field, T. R.; Bowen, A. J.; Wolf-Watz, H.;
Elofsson, M.; Stevens, M. P.; Galyov, E. E. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
2007, 51, 2631.
(13) Felise, H. B.; Nguyen, H. V.; Pfuetzner, R. A.; Barry, K. C.; Jackson, S. R.;
Blanc, M. P.; Bronstein, P. A.; Kline, T.; Miller, S. I. Cell Host Microbe
2008, 4, 325.
(14) Weissleder, R.; Pittet, M. J. Nature 2008, 452, 580.
JA102257V
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 24, 2010 8245