5936 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 13, 2010
Algarra et al.
intermediates because the actual reaction pathway depends
not only on the nature of the proton donor and acceptor but
also on the solvent and the presence and identity of the
counterion.11,12 In spite of the existing chemical analogies
between molybdenum and tungsten, differences arise regard-
ing bonding energies, acidity/basicity, and stability. An
increase in the homolytic M-H dissociation energies in
mononuclear cationic LnM-Hþ complexes when descending
within group 6 has been estimated.13 Relativistic effects are
considered to be the key factor responsible for the stronger
bond in the tungsten complex.
Lledos et al. have compared basicity, hydrogen bonding, and
the mechanism of reaction with acids for two homologues,
Mo(IV) and W(IV) metal hydrides of formula [Cp*M(dppe)-
H3].14 Both experimental and theoretical results show a greater
metal basicity for the tungsten system, although the two com-
pounds are reversibly protonated to yield an identical classical
tetrahydride product, [Cp*M(dppe)H4]þ, without the detection
of a dihydrogen intermediate. Contrary to the molybdenum sys-
tem, a direct proton transfer to the metal assisted by the hydride
ligand has been invoked for the reaction of [Cp*W(dppe)H3]
with acids. Regarding stability, the molybdenum hydride com-
plex loses H2 in coordinating solvents or in the presence of co-
ordinating anions, while its tungsten counterpart is stable under
the same conditions.11 Recent experiments by the same authors
indicate that the reaction of [Mo(CO)Cp*H(PMe3)2] with
methods.17,18 Diphosphine (R,R)-Me-BPE was purchased from
Strem Chemicals. Solvents for synthesis and electrochemical
measurements were dried and degassed by standard methods
before use.
Physical Measurements. Elemental analyses were performed
on an EA 1108 CHNS microanalyzer at the Universidad de La
Laguna. 31P{1H} NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mer-
cury 300 MHz apparatus and were referenced to external 85%
H3PO4. 1H, 13C{1H}, and 1H-13C gHSQC spectra were recorded
on a Varian INOVA 500 MHz apparatus using CD2Cl2 or acetone-
d6 as the solvent. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm from tetra-
methylsilane with the solvent resonance as the internal standard.
IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer System 2000 FT-IR
using KBr pellets. Signal intensities are denoted as s=strong, m=
medium, and w=weak. Electronic absorption spectra were ob-
tained on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda-19 spectrophotometer in
dichloromethane. Circular dichroism measurements were recorded
on a JASCO J-810 spectropolarimeter. Electrospray mass spectra
were recorded with a Quattro LC (quadrupole-hexapole-quad-
rupole) mass spectrometer with an orthogonal Z-spray electro-
spray interface (Micromass, Manchester, U.K.). The cone voltage
was set at 20 V unless otherwise stated using CH3CN as the mobile
phase solvent. Nitrogen was employed as a drying and nebulizing
gas. Isotope experimental patterns were compared with theoretical
patterns obtained using the MassLynx 4.0 program.19
Synthesis. [Mo3S4H3(dmpe)3](BPh4), [1](BPh4). To a green
solution of [Mo3S4Cl3(dmpe)3](BPh4) (0.168 g, 0.130 mmol) in
THF (20 mL) was added an excess of NaBH4 (0.044 g, 1.164
mmol) under nitrogen. The solution color turned purple within
30 min. After the mixture was stirred for 2.5 h, it was taken to dry-
ness, redissolved in CH2Cl2, and filtered in order to eliminate the
excess of NaBH4 and other inorganic salts. Finally, a microcrystal-
line purple solid was obtained by slow diffusion of diethyl ether into
the filtrate (0.124 g, yield: 80%). Found Mo3S4P6C42H71B (%): S,
10.71; C, 42.26; H, 5.93. Requires (%): S, 10.79; C, 42.44; H,
6.02%. RMN 31P{1H}/δ: -144.00 (sept, 1J(P-F) 710.58 Hz),
24.00 (d, 2J(P-P) 15.9 Hz) and 41.12 (d, 2J(P-P) 15.9 Hz).
Et2O HBF4 leads to a dihydrogen complex in tetrahydrofurane
3
and to a classical dihydride in dichloromethane, thus showing
again the important role of the solvent in this kind of reaction.15
An essentially identical mechanism has been found for the
reaction between the Mo(IV) and W(IV) hydrides [Cp2MH2]
with acids.16 For both Mo and W complexes, acid attack occurs
in this case at the hydride site to generate dihydrogen species;
however, for the molybdenum product, the subsequent cleavage
of the dihydrogen ligand yields to the formation of dinuclear
species. Again, the higher instability of the Mo(IV) hydrides in
front of their tungsten homologues is evidenced.
2
RMN 1H/δ: -2.95 (3H hydride, dd, 2J(P-H) 62.8, J(P0-H)
36.5 Hz), 0.40 (9H, CH3, d, 2J(P-H) 8.5 Hz), 1.51 (9H, CH3, d,
2J(P-H) 8.5 Hz), 1.89 (3H, CH2, m,), 2.00 (9H, CH3, d, 2J(P-H)
8.5 Hz), 2.07 (3H, CH2, m), 2.19 (9H, CH3, d, 2J(P-H) 8.5 Hz),
2.51 (3H, CH2, m), 2.60 (3H, CH2, m,). RMN 13C{1H}/δ: 14.71
Despite the precedents above, systematic knowledge on the
kinetics of reaction with acids of transition metal hydrides of
the same stoichiometry for metals within the same group is still
scarce. With the isolation of the [Mo3S4H3(diphosphine)3]þ
cluster salts with two different diphosphines, dmpe or (R,R)-
Me-BPE, the limitation that precluded such systematic study
has been overcome. In this work, we report not only the
isolation of the first Mo3S4 cluster hydrides but also a
complete study on the kinetics of their reaction with acids
(HCl) in dichloromethane. The kinetics of the reaction are
compared with data obtained for their tungsten counterparts.
The study is also extended to the analysis of the phosphine
nature on the reaction kinetics and mechanism.
1
1
(CH3, d, J(C-P) 66.5 Hz), 20.66 (CH3, d, J(C-P) 136.5 Hz),
21.60 (CH3, d, 1J(C-P) 78.0 Hz), 21.82 (CH3, d, 1J(C-P) 62.0 Hz),
28.59 (CH2, m), 28.86 ppm (CH2, m). ESI-MS(CH3CN, 20 V): m/z
(%) 868.9 (100) [Mþ].
[Mo3S4H3((R,R)-Me-BPE)3]Cl ([2]Cl). To a suspension of
[Mo3S4Cl3((R,R)-Me-BPE)3]Cl (0,150 g, 0,112 mmol) in dry
THF (15 mL) was added LiBH4 (0.074 g, 3.398 mmol), and
then the mixture was stirred under a nitrogen atmosphere. After
48 h, the reaction mixture was filtered to remove the excess reducing
agent and inorganic salts formed. Then, solvent was removed under
a vacuum, and the solid was recrystallized from CH2Cl2/ether
mixtures. The resulting solid was washed with water, isopropanol,
and ether to yield 78 mg of the hydride product (yield: 56.4%).
Found Mo3ClS4P6C42H87 (%): C, 41,03; H, 7,15. Requires (%): C,
40,70; H, 6,91%. RMN 31P{1H} (CDCl3, 121 MHz) δ: 59.56 (d,
3P), 86.84 ppm (d, 3P). RMN 1H(CD2Cl2, 300MHz) δ:-2.37 (dd,
3H hydride, 2J(P-H) 36.44, 2J(P0-H) 63.37 Hz). RMN 13C{1H}
(CD2Cl2, 300 MHz) δ: 13.19 (CH3, d), 14.73 (CH3, d), 17.87 (CH3,
d), 18.04 (CH3, d), 24.98 (CH, d), 25.12 (CH, d), 26.03 (CH, d),
26.13 (CH, d), 35.12 (CH2, d), 35.75 (CH2, d), 38.37 (CH2, d), 39.0
Experimental Section
General Remarks. [Mo3S4Cl3(dmpe)3](BPh4) and [Mo3S4Cl3-
((R,R)-Me-BPE)3]Br were prepared according to literature
(11) Besora, M.; Lledos, A.; Maseras, F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 957–966.
(12) Algarra, A. S. G.; Basallote, M. G.; Fernandez-Trujillo, M. J.;
Llusar, R.; Safont, V. S.; Vicent, C. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 5774–5784.
(13) Wang, D. M.; Angelici, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 935–942.
(14) Belkova, N. V.; Besora, M.;Baya, M.; Dub, P. A.; Epstein, L. M.; Lledos,
A.; Poli, R.; Revin, P. O.; Shubina, E. S. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 9921–9934.
(15) Dub, P. A.; Belkova, N. V.; Filippov, O. A.; Daran, J.-C.; Epstein,
L. M.; Lledos, A.; Shubina, E. S.; Poli, R. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 189–201.
(16) Henderson, R. A.; Oglieve, K. E. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993,
3431–3439.
(CH2, d), 40.14 (CH2, d), 41.87 ppm (CH2, d). IR (KBr) cm-1
:
2923 (i), 2862 (i), 1450 (i), 1407 (m), 1369 (m), 1068 (m), 696 (m),
(17) Estevan, F.; Feliz, M.; Llusar, R.; Mata, J. A.; Uriel, S. Polyhedron
2001, 20, 527–535.
(18) Feliz, M.; Guillamon, E.; Llusar, R.; Vicent, C.; Stiriba, S. E.; Perez-
Prieto, J.; Barberis, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1486–1492.
(19) MASSLYNX, 4.0 ed.; Waters Ltd.: Milford, MA, 2005.