asymmetric tactic to access spiro[4H-pyran-3,3′-oxindole]
compounds is particularly promising as well as strongly
desired.
One of the desirable goals in organic chemistry is the
catalytic asymmetric assembly of simple and readily available
precursor molecules into stereochemically complex prod-
ucts.6 In addition, asymmetric organocatalysis has recently
emerged as a promising synthetic tool for the organic
synthesis.7 Therefore, as a continuation of our intense
research on asymmetric organocatalysis8a-c and the prepara-
tion of chiral oxindole derivatives,8d we have recently
become interested in the stereoselective construction of the
spiro[4H-pyran-3,3′-oxindole] motifs. Herein, we will report
the first asymmetric organocatalytic two- and three-compo-
nent reactions via a domino Knoevenagel/Michael/cyclization
sequence that provide a series of spiro[4H-pyran-3,3′-
oxindoles] in excellent yield (up to 99%) with good to
excellent ee values (up to 97% ee) from simple and readily
available starting materials.
Figure 1. Chiral organocatalysts tested in this study.
At the outset of the study, a variety of chiral organocata-
lysts cat. 1-10 (Figure 1) were tested in the selected reaction
of substrates 1c and 2a in 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) at 0
°C, and the results are summarized in Table 1. As shown,
cupreine (CPN),9,10 quinine’s C6′-OH derivative, gave the
best results (92% yield, 85% ee) among these tested
organocatalysts (Table 1, entry 8 vs 1-7 and 9-10). Then,
with CPN as catalyst, the screening of the ratio of substrates
1c to 2a revealed that 5.0 equiv of 2a to 1c was the optimal
ratio (Table 1, entry 11).
Table 1. Screening of Different Chiral Organocatalysts and the
Ratio of Substrates 1c to 2aa
entry
cat.
1c:2a
time (h)
yield (%)b
ee (%)c
Afterward, during the investigation of the protecting
groups on the N1 of isatylidene malononitrile derivatives,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
cat. 1
cat. 2
cat. 3
cat. 4
cat. 5
cat. 6
cat. 7
cat. 8
cat. 9
cat. 10
cat. 8
cat. 8
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:10
1:5
16
16
34
34
34
36
24
12
36
36
16
36
60
94
58
75
88
trace
trace
92
82
90
-2
0
-36
0
-3
nd
nd
85
7
54
86
84
(4) (a) Shanthi, G.; Subbulakshmi, G.; Perumal, P. T. Tetrahedron 2007,
63, 2057. (b) Zhu, S.-L.; Ji, S.-J.; Zhang, Y. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9365.
(c) Gao, S.; Tsai, C. H.; Tseng, C.; Yao, C.-F. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 9143.
(d) Elinson, M. N.; Ilovaisky, A. I.; Dorofeev, A. S.; Merkulova, V. M.;
Stepanov, N. O.; Miloserdov, F. M.; Ogibin, Y. N.; Nikishin, G. I.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 10543. (e) Fotouhi, L.; Heravi, M. M.; Fatehi, A.;
Bakhtiari, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5379. (f) Wang, L.-M.; Jiao, N.;
Qiu, J.; Yu, J.-J.; Liu, J.-Q.; Guo, F.-L.; Liu, Y. Tetrahedron 2010, 66,
339. (g) Shaabani, A.; Samadi, S.; Badri, Z.; Rahmati, A. Catal. Lett. 2005,
104, 39. (h) Shaabani, A.; Samadi, S.; Rahmati, A. Synth. Commun. 2007,
37, 491. (i) Abdolmohammadi, S.; Balalaie, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48,
3299.
10
11
12
92
90
1:2
(5) For selected examples, see: (a) Fensome, A.; Adams, W. R.; Adams,
A. L.; Berrodin, T. J.; Cohen, J.; Huselton, C.; Illenberger, A.; Kern, J. C.;
Hudak, V. A.; Marella, M. A.; Melenski, E. G.; McComas, C. C.; Mugford,
C. A.; Slayden, O. D.; Yudt, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Zhu, Y.; Winneker,
R. C.; Wrobel, J. E. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 1861. (b) Fensome, A.; Bender,
R.; Cohen, J.; Collins, M. A.; Mackner, V. A.; Miller, L. L.; Ullrich, J. W.;
Winneker, R.; Wrobel, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2002, 12, 3487. (c) Bignan, G. C.; Battista, K.; Connolly, P. J.; Orsini,
M. J.; Liu, J.; Middleton, S. A.; Reitz, A. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 5022. (d) Feldman, K. S.; Vidulova, D. B. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
1869. (e) Kawasaki, T.; Ogawa, A.; Takashima, Y.; Sakamoto, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 1591.
a Reactions were performed on a 0.1 mmol scale in 1.0 mL of DCE at
0 °C. b Isolated yield. c Determined by HPLC.
methoxymethyl (MOM-) was superior to H-, Boc-, and Ac-
groups in light of the reactivity and enantioselectivity (Table
2, entries 1-4). Gratifyingly, a subsequent solvent screen
resulted in selection of conditions that significantly increased
the ee value without diminishing the yield (Table 2, entries
3 and 5-9). Further, adding 4 Å molecular sieves (MS) led
to fast reaction (14 h) and a slightly higher ee value of 95%
(Table 1, entry 10). Finally, 0 °C was found to be the most
suitable reaction temperature (Table 2, entries 10-12). In
summary, acetylacetone/isatylidene malononitriles (5/1),
(6) For selected reviews, see: (a) Tietze, L. F.; Evers, T. H.; To¨pken, E.
;Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 903. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Beifuss, U. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 131. (c) Tietze, L. F. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 115.
(7) For selected reviews on asymmetric organocatalysis, see: (a)
Dondoni, A.; Massi, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4638. (b)
Melchiorre, P.; Marigo, M.; Carlone, A.; Bartoli, G. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2008, 47, 6138. (c) Doyle, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. Chem. ReV. 2007,
107, 5713. (d) Connon, S. J. Synlett 2009, 354.
(8) (a) Liao, Y.-H.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Z.-J.; Cun, L.-F.; Zhang, X.-M.;
Yuan, W.-C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20, 2397. (b) Liao, Y.-H.;
Chen, W.-B.; Wu, Z.-J.; Du, X.-L.; Cun, L.-F.; Zhang, X.-M.; Yuan, W.-
C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 827. (c) Zhang, H.; Cun, L.-F.; Zhang,
X.-M.; Yuan, W.-C. Lett. Org. Chem. 2010, 7, 219. (d) Chen, W.-B.; Du,
(9) For a representative review of cupreines and cupreidines as
bifunctional cinchona organocatalysts in asymmetric organocatalysis, see:
Marcelli, T.; van Maarseveen, J. H.; Hiemstra, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 7496.
X.-L.; Cun, L.-F.; Zhang, X.-M.; Yuan, W.-C. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 1441
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 14, 2010
3133