V. Singh et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 3337–3339
3339
Scheme 4. Synthesis of tricyclic intermediate 2.
4. (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. M. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis;
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA: Weinheim, 2006; (b) Ugi, I. Pure Appl.
Chem. 2001, 73, 187.
Thus, the adduct 6 was treated with Zn in the presence of NH4Cl
in aq. MeOH at ambient temperature (ꢀ30 °C) which gave the b-
hydroxyketone 10 in excellent yield (93%) which upon Jones’
oxidation and decarboxylation furnished the keto-lactone 11
(Scheme 4). Catalytic hydrogenation of 11 readily gave the desired
compound 2 which represents the tricyclic core of maoecrystal V.
The structure of all the compounds was clearly revealed from their
spectral data.9
In summary, we have presented an efficient and stereo-selec-
tive route to tricyclic core structure of maoecrystal V from a simple
aromatic precursor. A tandem oxidative dearomatization of appro-
priately appended o-hydroxymethylphenol and intramolecular
5. (a) Liao, C.-C.; Peddinti, R. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 856–866; (b) Magdziak, D.;
Meek, S. J.; Pettus, T. R. R. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1383–1429; (c) Quideau, S.;
Pouysegu, L.; Deffieux, D. Synlett 2008, 467–495; (d) Pouysegu, L.; Deffieux, D.;
Quideau, S. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 2235–2261. and references therein.
6. (a) Berube, A.; Drutu, I.; Wood, J. L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5421–5424; (b) Luo, S.-Y.;
Jang, Y.-I.; Liu, J.-Y.; Chu, C.-S.; Liao, C.-C.; Hung, S.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 8082–8085; (c) Mehta, G.; Maity, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 318–322; (d)
Wenderaski, T. A.; Huang, S.; Pettus, T. R. R. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4104–4109;
(e) Mehta, G.; Sen, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 503–507.
7. (a) Singh, V. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 324–333; (b) Singh, V.; Praveena, G. D.;
Karki, K.; Mobin, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2058–2067; (c) Singh, V.; Sahu, P.
K.; Sahu, B. C.; Mobin, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6092–6104.
8. Singh, V.; Porinchu, M.; Vedantham, P.; Sahu, P. K. Org. Synth. 2005, 81, 171–177.
9. All the compounds were thoroughly characterized with the help of spectral data.
cycloaddition gave
a tricyclic adduct having bridged bicy-
Data for adduct 6: mp 139–140 °C. IR mmax (KBr): 1744, 1731 cmÀ1 1H NMR
.
clo[2.2.2]octanone framework annulated with the lactone ring.
Manipulation of the oxirane ring and the double bond furnished
the desired intermediate. The present methodology constitutes a
nice example of creation of molecular complexity from aromatics
which is an important aspect of synthesis design.3
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.65 (dd, J1 = 8.1 Hz, J2 = 6.9 Hz, 1H) and 5. 84 (d, J = 8.1 Hz,
1H), 4.47 (dd of part of an AB system, JAB = 12.2 Hz, J2 = 6.1 Hz, J3 = 3 Hz, 1H),
4.30 (superimposed dd of part of an AB system, JAB = 12.2 Hz, J2 = J3 = 4.5 Hz, 1H),
3.20 (part of an AB system JAB = 6.2 Hz, 1H) and 2.92 (part of AB system partly
merged with another m, JAB = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.06–2.90 (complex, m, 2H), 2.78–2.66
(m, 1H), 2.40–2.32 (merged m, 2H), 2.06–1.74 (complex m, 1H). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3):
d 202.1, 172.2 (CO groups) and 137.4, 132.1 (olefinic
carbons), 65.2, 57.1, 53.5, 51.0, 39.3, 37.8, 26.1, and 24.0 for other carbons.
HRMS (ESI) m/z: 221.0808 (M+H)+; C12H13O4 requires 221.0814.
Acknowledgement
Crystal data: C12H12O4, Mol. Wt. 220.22. Crystal size = 0.23 Â 0.18 Â 0.13 mm.
ꢀ
Space group: Triclinic P, Z = 2, a = 6.5009(5), b = 8.2023 (5), c = 9. 5100 (8) Å,
We are grateful to the Department of Science and Technology
(DST), New Delhi for continued financial support. One of us (P.B.)
is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi for a fellowship. We also thank
DST for the creation of a National Centre for Single Crystal X-ray
diffraction facility.
a
= 102. 097(6), b = 97.030(7),
volume = 490.33 (6) Å3, T = 150(2) K,
collected/unique 3382/1723, [R(int) = 0.0258], final
R1 = 0.0404, wR2 = 0.1144. indices all data = R1 = 0.0499, wR2 = 0.1183.
c
= 93.250 (6)°. Dc: 1.492 mg/m3, crystal
c
= 0.71073 Å F (000) = 232. Reflections
indices [I >2 (I)],
R
r
R
Crystallographic data has been deposited with Cambridge Crystallographic
data Centre, CCDC No. 771301. Copy of the data can be obtained, free of charge,
Data for compound 11: mp 92–93 °C. IR mmax (KBr): 1731, 1715 cmÀ1 1H NMR
.
References and notes
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d 6.63 (dd, J1 = 8 Hz, J2 = 7 Hz, 1H), 5.73 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 4.46–
4.40 (complex m, 1H), 4.28–4.20 (complex m, 1H), 3.14–3.08 (br m, 1H), 2.98 (t
of d, J1 = 15 Hz, J2 = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.30–2.22 (complex m, 1H), 2.20–2.16 (m, 2H),
2.06–1.88 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 207.9, 172.9, 140.0, 130.5, 65.5,
50.8, 38.8, 38.4, 31.7, 27.8, 26.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: 193.0861 (M+H)+; C11H13O3
requires 193.0865.
1. Li, S.-H.; Wang, J.; Niu, X.-M.; Zhang, H.-J.; Sun, H.-D.; Li, M.-L.; Tian, Q.-E.; Lu, Y.;
Zhang, Q.-T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4327–4330.
2. (a) Gong, J.; Lin, G.; Li, C.-H.; Yang, Z. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4770–4773; (b) Krawczuk,
P. J.; Schone, N.; Baran, P. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4774–4776; (c) Peng, F.; Yu, M.;
Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6586–6587; (d) Nicolaou, K. C.; Dong,
L.; Deng, L.; Talbot, A. C.; Chen, D. Y.-K. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 70–72.
3. (a) Chanon, M.; Baron, R.; Baralotto, C.; Julliard, M.; Hendrickson, J. B. Synthesis
1998, 1559–15583; (b) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259–
281; (c) Corey, E. J.; Cheng, X.-M. The Logic of Chemical Synthesis; John Wiley and
Sons: New York, 1989.
Data for compound 2: mp 104–105 °C. IR mmax (KBr): 1742, 1723 cmÀ1 1H NMR
.
(400 MHz, CDCl3): d 4.40–4.29 (m, 1H), 4.15–4.00 (m, 1H), 2.85–2.80 (m, 1H),
2.74–2.70 (m, 1H), 2.50–2.20 (m, 4H), 2.00–1.60 (m, 5H), 1.45–1.30 (m, 1H). 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 212.2, 173.7, 65.4, 44.3, 43.5, 38.4, 29.3, 27.2, 26.4,
25.94, 25.90. HRMS (ESI) m/z: 195.1022 (M+H)+; C11H15O3 requires 195.1021.