C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 3. van’t Hoff plots (a) and Arrhenius plots (b) for the i- f
o-inversion process of 1+ in CDCl3 (green), acetone-d6 (blue), and CD3CN
(red).
enhanced emission of i-isomer was derived from thermal activation
between close levels in fast equilibrium, which is discussed as 1CT
6,7
3
and low-lying CT excited states.
We conclude that the photoprocesses of the two isomers are
different in the identity of the excited state. Control over the
inversion dynamics is important for the development of a photo-
electron transfer system composed of this complex family.
As for the dynamics of inversion, a lower population of the
o-isomer was found in the polar solvent (Figures 3a, S9, and S10).
The molar ratio of the o-isomer at 253 K was 74% in CDCl3, 68%
in acetone-d6, and 65% in CD3CN. This trend was observed across
the full temperature range tested, and the equilibrium constant was
almost temperature-invariant. Because the i- and o-isomers were
similar with respect to the coordination skeleton, the polarity
differences between the complex cations of the two isomers were
expected to be small. Therefore, the isomer ratio was influenced
by the electrostatic effects of the solvated contact ion pair. In less
polar solvents, the i-isomer was destabilized by the approach of
the counteranion to the copper center due to steric effects of the
proximal methyl group. These results suggest that the ratio of the
inversion isomers could be tuned by electrostatic interactions.
The kinetics of the inversion motion was evaluated by simulating
the temperature-dependent 1H NMR spectra in CDCl3, acetone-d6,
and CD3CN (Figures 3b, S11, and S12). The rate constant for the
i- f o- inversion, k, at 293 K was 20 s-1 in CDCl3, 70 s-1 in
acetone-d6, and 120 s-1 in CD3CN. The k value at room temperature
in CD3CN was 1 order of magnitude larger than that in CDCl3,
suggesting that a coordinated solvent molecule promoted ring
inversion by assisting dissociation of the pyrimidine N atoms from
the copper center. The k value varied from 10-6 s-1 (frozen motion)
to 103 s-1 as the temperature and solvent were varied.
Figure 2. Photochemical properties of 1•BF4. (a) UV-vis absorption
spectrum (dotted line) and the steady-state emission spectra using 400 nm
excitation (solid line) of 1+ in acetone at room temperature. (b) Experimental
630 nm emission decay of 1+ in acetone at room temperature (red) and
203 K (purple) excited at 425 nm. Time-resolved emission spectra of 1+ in
acetone at several temperatures for the slower (τ ) 40 ns) component (c)
and the faster (τ ) 2 ns) component (d).
ratio of the i- and o-isomers in acetone remained 3:7 over the
temperature range from 203 to 293 K (Figure S4).
The UV-vis absorption spectrum of 1+ in acetone showed the
characteristic CT absorption bond (λabs ) 378 nm, ꢀ ) 2.7 × 103
M-1 cm-1) of the [Cu(diimine)(diphosphine)]+ family (Figure 2a).
The absence of an absorption around 450 nm and the independence
of the absorption profile on the concentration of 1+ suggested that
the formation of other species, such as [Cu(Mepypm)2]+, was
negligible.6 The steady-state emission spectrum of 1+ in acetone
(Figure 2a) exhibited emission at λem ) 635 nm from the CT state.6
These results indicate that the wavelengths of maximum absorption
and the emission energies of the i- and o-isomers were comparable.
Emission lifetime measurements of 1+ revealed that the decay
curve could be deconvoluted into two components (Figures 2b and
S5). The [Cu(diimine)(diphosphine)]+ family is known to show a
single decay.6,7 Therefore, the two components could be reasonably
assigned to the i- and o-isomers. The faster (τ ) 2 ns) and the
slower (τ ) 40 ns) components were attributed to emission from
the o- and i-isomers, respectively (Figure S5), because introduction
of a bulky substituent into the coordination sphere is known to
elongate the lifetime of the excited state of copper(I) complexes
by inhibiting structural relaxation and/or preventing additional
solvent coordination.6,7 This assignment was further supported by
the similarities between the emission lifetimes of the o-isomer and
[Cu(bpy)(DPEphos)]+ (bpy )2,2′-bipyridine), which does not
contain bulky groups near the metal center (Figure S6). The
emission spectra of two isomers were deconvoluted using time-
dependent spectral measurements. The faster component was
slightly red-shifted relative to the slower component, implying that
the long-lived excited state of the i-isomer has the higher energy
(Figure S7).
In conclusion, a novel two-state conformational isomer system
with an excitation process that was sensitive to the ligand ring
inversion on the copper(I) center was synthesized. The inversion
dynamics largely depended on the temperature and solvent,
suggesting that it may be possible to control the ring inversion
motions. This strategy may be useful in the construction of a single
molecular system for light-energy processing.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid
from MEXT of Japan (20750044, 20245013, and 21108002, area
2107) and the Global COE Program for Chemistry Innovation.
The differences between emission behaviors of these isomers
were clearly reflected in the heat sensitivity. The emission decay
profile showed that the relative intensity of the slower component
decreased upon cooling and became almost negligible at 203 K
(Figure S8). The lifetimes of the two components were almost
temperature-independent, as demonstrated by the best fits of the
decay profiles at each temperature (203-293 K). The deconvoluted
emission spectra of the slower component were blue-shifted and
showed an increase in the emission intensity upon heating (Figure
2c). The emission spectra of the faster component were relatively
insensitive to temperature (Figure 2d). We deduce that the thermally
Supporting Information Available: Materials and methods, crystal
structure data (CIF), and spectral data. This material is available free
References
(1) (a) O’Regan, B.; Gra¨tzel, M. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. (b) Hagfeldt, A.;
Gra¨tzel, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 269–277. (c) Ardo, S.; Meyer, G. J.
Chem. Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 115–164. (d) Hamann, T. W.; Jensen, R. A.;
Martinson, A. B. F.; Ryswyk, H. V.; Hupp, J. T. Energy EnViron. Sci. 2008,
1, 66–78.
(2) (a) Baldo, M. A.; O’Brien, D. F.; You, Y.; Shoustikov, A.; Sibley, S.;
Thompson, M. E.; Forrest, S. R. Nature 1998, 395, 151–154. (b) Baldo,
9
9580 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 28, 2010