a larger band gap and more planarity improved by the bridging
nitrogen atom. Once the free path for electrons along the whole
molecular sweeping by the threshold voltages, the more planarity
of carbazole moieties can prevent the charge from going back to
the initial state even after the application of the reverse bias, thus
the ON state of the device can be sustained. TPA units exhibit
easier oxidizability of the nitrogen center, and transportability of
positive charge centers via the radical cation species.56 For Al/PI
(TPABD-BTFBPDA)/ITO devices, the ON state of the device
cannot be sustained due to the limited delocalization of charges
on the triphenylamine substituted biphenyl moieties.28 The PI
(TPABD-BTFBPDA) relaxes to the initial conformation after
the removal of the applied electric field for a short period of time.
The dihedral angles between the ring moieties reduce to the
original state, and, also, the potential barriers of back charge
transfer disappear. Hence, the back charge transfer occurs from
the phthalimide to TPA (reset to the OFF state) and confirms
the bistable switching behavior. This characteristic is similar
to the rapid decay of photocurrent in aromatic PIs, resulting
from the back electron transfer or the germinating recombina-
tion process57,58 after the irradiation had been turned off.
Moreover, the calculated dipole moment of CzBD-BTFBPDA is
only 3.55 D while that of TPABD-BTFBPDA is 2.05 D, indi-
cating that the polarity of the PI(TPABD-BTFBPDA) is not
strong enough to retain the charge transfer state, thus accounting
for the short retention time of the ON state. Also, a lower
HOMO level of CzBD-BTFBPDA than TPABD-BTFBPDA
results in a higher turn-on voltage of the former.
Notes and references
1 Q. Ling, D. Liaw, C. Zhu, D. Chan, E. Kang and K. Neoh, Prog.
Polym. Sci., 2008, 33, 917.
2 T. Driscoll, H.-T. Kim, B.-G. Chae, B.-J. Kim, Y.-W. Lee,
N. M. Jokerst, S. Palit, D. R. Smith, M. Di Ventra and
D. N. Basov, Science, 2009, 325, 1518.
3 T. J. Lee, C.-W. Chang, S. G. Hahm, K. Kim, S. Park, D. M. Kim,
J. Kim, W.-S. Kwon, G.-S. Liou and M. Ree, Nanotechnology,
2009, 20, 135204.
4 S. Moller, C. Perlov, W. Jackson, C. Taussig and S. R. Forrest,
Nature, 2003, 426, 166.
5 S. Tal, B. Blumer-Ganon, M. Kapon and Y. Eichen, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2005, 127, 9848.
6 Q.-D. Ling, F.-C. Chang, Y. Song, C.-X. Zhu, D.-J. Liaw,
D. S.-H. Chan, E.-T. Kang and K.-G. Neoh, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 8732.
7 J. Hu, Y. Li, Z. Ji, G. Jiang, L. Yang, W. Hu, H. Gao, L. Jiang,
Y. Wen, Y. Song and D. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 3530.
8 D. M. Kim, S. Park, T. J. Lee, S. G. Hahm, K. Kim, J. C. Kim,
W. Kwon and M. Ree, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 11713.
9 K. Kim, S. Park, S. G. Hahm, T. J. Lee, D. M. Kim, J. C. Kim,
W. Kwon, Y. G. Ko and M. Ree, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 9143.
10 S. L. Lim, N.-J. Li, J.-M. Lu, Q.-D. Ling, C. X. Zhu, E.-T. Kang and
K. G. Neoh, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2009, 1, 60.
11 C.-L. Liu, J.-C. Hsu, W.-C. Chen, K. Sugiyama and A. Hirao, ACS
Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2009, 1, 1974.
12 Y.-L. Liu, K.-L. Wang, G.-S. Huang, C.-X. Zhu, E.-S. Tok,
K.-G. Neoh and E.-T. Kang, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 3391.
13 N.-H. You, C.-C. Chueh, C.-L. Liu, M. Ueda and W.-C. Chen,
Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 4456.
14 T. Kuorosawa, C.-C. Chueh, C.-L. Liu, T. Higashihara, M. Ueda and
W.-C. Chen, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 1236.
15 H. Li, N. Li, H. Gu, Q. Xu, F. Yan, J. Lu, X. Xia, J. Ge and L. Wang,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 6117.
16 R. J. Tseng, J. X. Huang, J. Ouyang, R. B. Kaner and Y. Yang, Nano
Lett., 2005, 5, 1077.
17 J. H. Jung, J. Y. Jin, I. Lee, T. W. Kim, H. G. Roh and Y. H. Kim,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 2006, 88, 112107.
Conclusions
18 A. Prakash, J. Ouyang, J.-L. Lin and Y. Yang, J. Appl. Phys., 2006,
100, 054309.
19 L. Li, Q.-D. Ling, S.-L. Lim, Y.-P. Tan, C. Zhu, D. S. H. Chan,
E.-T. Kang and K.-G. Neoh, Org. Electron., 2007, 8, 401.
20 Y. Yang, J. Ouyang, L. Ma, R. J. H. Tseng and C. W. Chu, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2006, 16, 1001.
21 S. P. Kim, T. H. Lee, D. U. Lee, E. K. Kim, H. M. Koo, W. J. Cho
and Y. H. Kim, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 2008, 47, 4996.
22 D. U. Lee, S. P. Kim, T. H. Lee, E. E. Kim, H. M. Koo, W. J. Cho and
Y. H. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc., 2008, 53, 327.
23 S. P. Kim, T. H. Lee, D. U. Lee, E. K. Kim, H. M. Koo, W. J. Cho
and Y. H. Kim, Curr. Appl. Phys., 2009, 9, S43.
The facile functionalization of the pendent group of the PI unit
may offer an opportunity to reduce the chain interactions,
thereby improving the electric, optoelectronic, and photonic
properties of the resulting polymers. In this study, PI(CzBD-
BTFBPDA) and PI(TPABD-BTFBPDA) containing carbazole
and triphenylamine pendent groups were prepared by respective
reaction of 2,20-bis[4-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)phenyl]-4,40-biphenyl
diamine (CzBD) and 2,20-bis[4-(diphenylamino)phenyl]-
4,40-biphenyl diamine (TPABD) reacting with 20-bis[40-(300,400,500-
trifluorophenyl)phenyl]-4,40,5,50-biphenyltetracarboxylic
di-
24 H. M. Koo, W. J. Cho, D. U. Lee, S. P. Kim and E. K. Kim, J.
Electroceram., 2009, 23, 150.
anhydride (BTFBPDA) under two steps. The memory devices
with the configuration of Al/PI(CzBD-BTFBPDA)/ITO showed
nonvolatile memory characteristics with low turn-on threshold
voltages around ꢃ2.7 V, while Al/PI(CzBD-BTFBPDA)/ITO
devices presented flash memory behavior with low turn-on and
turn-off threshold voltages at ꢁ1.6 and +2.2 V, respectively.
Both of the devices exhibited high ON/OFF current ratios
around 106 and long retention times of 104 s even in the ambient
atmosphere. The different turn-on threshold voltages apparently
resulted from the two different low-lying HOMO energy levels.
The theoretical analysis suggested that the charge transfer
mechanism could be used to explain the memory characteristics.
The relatively higher dipole moments of the carbazole-containing
PI compared to the triphenylamine-based PI provided a stable
charge transfer complex for the WORM memory devices. The
present study suggests that these new carbazole and triphenyl-
amine-containing PIs have potential applications for memory
devices.
25 D. U. Lee, S. J. Han, K. B. Seo, E. K. Kim, J. W. Shin, W. J. Cho and
Y. H. Kim, Superlattices Microstruct., 2009, 46, 176.
26 F. Li, T. W. Kim, W. Dong and Y. H. Kim, Thin Solid Films, 2009,
517, 3916.
27 Q.-D. Ling, D.-J. Liaw, E. Y.-H. Teo, C. Zhu, D. S.-H. Chan,
E.-T. Kang and K.-G. Neoh, Polymer, 2007, 48, 5182.
28 Y.-L. Liu, Q.-D. Ling, E.-T. Kang, K.-G. Neoh, D.-J. Liaw,
K.-L. Wang, W.-T. Liou, C.-X. Zhu and D. S.-H. Chan, J. Appl.
Phys., 2009, 105, 044501.
29 Q. S. Liu, K. J. Jiang, L. H. Wang, Y. Q. Wen, J. X. Wang, Y. Ma and
Y. L. Song, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2010, 96, 213305.
30 G. S. Liou, S. H. Hsiao, N. K. Huang and Y. L. Yang,
Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 5337.
31 M.-H. Lai, J.-H. Tsai, C.-C. Chueh, C.-F. Wang and W.-C. Chen,
Macromol. Chem. Phys., 2010, 211, 2017.
32 B. Liu, W.-L. Yu, Y.-H. Lai and W. Huang, Chem. Mater., 2001, 13,
1984.
33 S. G. Hahm, S. Choi, S.-H. Hong, T. J. Lee, S. Park, D. M. Kim,
W.-S. Kwon, K. Kim, O. Kim and M. Ree, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2008, 18, 3276.
34 G. Tian, D. Wu, S. Qi, Z. Wu and X. Wang, Macromol. Rapid
Commun., 2011, 32, 384.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 15643–15654 | 15653