Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
R2 = 4-FC6H4) in 75% yield (entry 1, Table 1). To our delight,
using (S)-tBuPHOX (L1; Figure 1)[21] as a ligand switched the
reaction pathway completely, affording 2a exclusively in 65%
yield with excellent enantioselectivity (e.r. 97/3, entry 2,
respectively), but in diminished yields (entries 4–5, Table 1).
The influence of the diboron reagents on the reaction
outcome was subsequently probed (entries 6–7, Table 1) and
tetrahydroxydiboron was found to reach an optimum, afford-
ing 2a in 90% yield with an e.r. of
93:7.[22] Carrying out the reaction at
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.
808C and with 2 equiv of H2O
slightly increased the enantioselec-
tivity to 95:5 (entries 8–9, Table 1).
Strikingly, using the electron-defi-
cient PHOX-type ligand (S)-L2
Entry
Ligand
Diboron
Base
Solvent
T [8C]
Yield 2a [%][c]
e.r.[d]
(Figure 1) shut the reaction down
completely (entry 10, Table 1).
Other bidentate ligands such as
BINAP (L3; Figure 1) and SEG-
PHOS (L4; Figure 1) gave inferior
results (entries 11–12, Table 1). No
reaction was observed when elec-
tron-rich and conformationally
rigid bisphospholane L5 and mono-
dentate phosphoramidite ligand L6
were used (entries 13–14, Table 1;
Figure 1). Further screening of the
solvents and Pd sources (entries 15–
19, Table 1) did not improve the
yield or the enantioselectivity of the
reaction. Finally, optimum condi-
tions were defined as follows:
1[b]
2[b]
3[b]
4[b]
5[b]
6[b]
7[b]
8[b]
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18[f]
19[g]
PPh3
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L1
L1
L1
L1
L1
B2Pin2
B2Pin2
B2Pin2
B2Pin2
B2Pin2
DABCO
DABCO
DIPEA
TMG
DBU
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
MeCN
toluene
THF
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
75 (3a)
65
trace
40[e]
45
60
90
88
90
N.R.
70
42
N.R.
N.R.
46
N.D.
70
–
97:3
–
95:5
96:4
93:7
93:7
95:5
95:5
–
73.5:26.5
46.5:23.5
–
–
95:5
–
Cat2B2
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
DABCO
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
B2(OH)4
DMF
MeCN
MeCN
55:45
94.5:5.5
95:5
87
88
PdCl2(MeCN)2/L1
as
catalyst,
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), PdCl2(MeCN)2 (0.1 equiv), ligand (0.2 equiv), base (4.0 equiv),
diboron (2.0 equiv), H2O (2.0 equiv), solvent (2.0 mL, 0.05m) in a sealed tube at 808C for 14 h; [b] H2O
(6.0 equiv) was used; [c] yields of isolated products; [d] determined by chiral supercritical fluid
chromatography; [e] compound 3a was isolated in 27% yield; [f] with Pd(OAc)2; [g] with Pd2(dba)3
(dba=bis(dibenzylideneacetone)). Key: B2Pin2 =bis(pinacolato)diboron,
Cat2B2 =bis(catecolato)diboron, DABCO=1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, DBU=1,8-diazabicyclo-
[5,4,0]undec-7-ene, TMG=1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine, MeCN=acetonitrile, THF=tetrahydrofuran,
DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide, N.R.=no reaction, N.D.=none detected.
DABCO as base, and the couple
B2(OH)4/H2O as a hydride donor in
MeCN at 808C (entry 9, Table 1).
With the optimum conditions in
hand (entry 9, Table 1), the general-
ity of the asymmetric reductive
Heck reaction was subsequently
investigated (Scheme 2). The Ca
aromatic substituent bearing an
electron donating or withdrawing group located at different
positions (ortho, meta, para) were well-tolerated to afford
3-methyl 3-aryl substituted oxindoles (2a–2h) in high yields
with excellent enantioselectivities. Alkyl substituents at the
Ca position, including those functionalized with CH2OMe
and CH2NBnTs, were compatible leading to the correspond-
ing oxindoles (2i–2k) in good yields with slightly diminished
e.r. values. Notably, in the case of benzyl substituted
acetanilide 1j, the alternative process involving Heck/intra-
molecular CH-functionalization leading to spirooxindole did
not take place.[23] The reductive Heck reaction of N-benzyl
acetanilide 1l proceeded efficiently to provide 2l in 86%
yield with an e.r. of 95.5:4.5. As the N-benzyl is readily
removed, it constitutes a route to N-unsubstituted oxindoles.
Finally, the effect of substituents on the benzene ring of the
aniline moiety was investigated. Once again, the electronic
effect remained minimal and the desired products
2m–s bearing different substituents (Me, Ph, OMe, Cl, F)
were obtained in good yields with high enantioselectivities.
The reaction was successfully applied to the synthesis of
6,7-benzoxindole 2t (86%, e.r. 96.5:3.5) and 4,5-benzoxindole
Figure 1. Structures of ligands.
Table 1). The structure of the base was found to play an
important role in the selective conversion of 1a to 2a. Thus,
replacing DABCO with Hꢀnigꢁs base (N,N-diisopropylethyl-
amine or DIPEA), a widely used hydride source in reductive
Heck reactions (entry 3, Table 1), produced only a trace
amount of 2a. Using other bases such as TMG and DBU
afforded 2a with high enantioselectivities (95:5 and 96:4,
2
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!