N. Kawatsuki et al. / Polymer 51 (2010) 2849e2856
2855
the fabrication conditions and optical properties of polarization
gratings of P1-P3 films when the maximum diffraction efficiency
was obtained. The n values were calculated by the theoretical
consideration using the value of the diffraction efficiency [35b]. It
shows that the energy required for fabricating satisfactory gratings
of P1 and P2 films was much lower than for P3 films because of the
low exposure energy required for the effective molecular reor-
Acknowledgments
D
This work was partially supported by a grant-in-aid of Scien-
tific Research in Priority Areas “New Frontiers in Photochromism
(No. 471)” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology (MEXT), and a grant-in-aid of Scientific Research
B (No. 21350129) and S (No. 21225006) from the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science.
ientation. Additionally, the
Dn values generated were similar to
those estimated from the uniaxially molecular-reoriented films for
all the gratings, since polarization holography induced the efficient
molecular reorientation. Furthermore, due to its larger Dn values of
Appendix. Supplementary material
reoriented P1 film, the diffraction efficiency was the highest among
P1-P3 films.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
To evaluate the resolution of the polarization gratings, the
influence of the grating constant on the polarization holography
was investigated [41]. Fig. 10 plots the induced birefringence at
632.8 nm of P1 and P3 films for various grating constant, where the
References
[1] (a) Shibaev VP, Kostromin SG, Ivanov SA. In: Shibaev VP, editor. Polymers as
electroactive and photooptical media. Berlin: Springer; 1996. p. 37e110;
(b) MacArdle CB. In: MacArdle CB, editor. Applied photochromic polymer
systems. New York: Blackie; 1991. p. 1e30;
(c) Krongauz V. In: MacArdle CB, editor. Applied photochromic polymer
systems. New York: Blackie; 1991. p. p121e73.
[2] (a) Ichimura K. Chem Rev 2000;100:1847e73;
induced
Dn was normalized at a maximum value. As the grating
constant becomes larger, the induced birefringence also becomes
larger until it is approximately saturated at a grating constant of
11 mm in both materials. It seems that the resolution of P1 might be
lower than that of P3, when the grating constant was small.
Because P1 contains elongated and rigid mesogenic side groups,
thermally enhanced reorientation process possesses a limitation for
the sufficient periodical molecular orientation.
One of the features of the polarization gratings is the
conversion of the polarization of the diffracted beams. Fig. 11aed
show polar-plots of the 0th and ꢃfirst-order diffracted laser
beams for P1 polarization gratings, which represent the optical
(b) Natansohn A, Rochon P. Chem Rev 2002;102:4139e76;
(c) Ikeda TJ. Mater Chem 2003;13:2037e57.
[3] O’Neill M, Kelly SM. J Phys D Appl Phys 2000;33:R67e84.
[4] Seki T. In: Nalwa HS, editor. Handbook of photochemistry and photobiology,
vol. 2. Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Sci Publishers; 2003. p. 435e65.
[5] (a) Anderle K, Birenheide R, Eich M, Wendrorff JH. Makromol Chem Rapid
Commun 1989;10:477e83;
(b) Shi Y, Steier WH, Yu L, Chen M, Dalton LR. Appl Phys Lett 1991;59:2935e7.
[6] Kawatsuki N, Ono H. In: Nalwa HS, editor. Organic electronics and photonics,
vol. 2. Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Sci Publishers; 2007. p. 301e44.
[7] Schadt M, Schmitt K, Kozinkov V, Chigrinov V. Jpn
1992;31:2155e64.
[8] Schadt M, Seiberle H, Schuster A. Nature 1994;381:212e5.
[9] Gibbons WM, Shannon PJ, Sun ST, Swetlin BJ. Nature 1991;351:49e50.
[10] (a) Wu Y, Demachi Y, Tsustusmi O, Kanazawa A, Hisono T, Ikeda T. Macro-
molecules 1998;31:4457e63;
(b) Wu Y, Demachi Y, Tsustusmi O, Kanazawa A, Hisono T, Ikeda T. Macro-
molecules 1998;31:1104e8.
[11] Han M, Ichimura K. Macromolecules 2001;34:90e8.
[12] Natansohm A, Rochon P, Pézolet M, Audet P, Brown D, To S. Macromolecules
1994;27:2580e5.
[13] (a) Kawatsuki N, Takatsuka H, Yamamoto T, Sangen O. J Polym Sci Part
A Polym Chem 1998;36:1521e6;
(b) Kawatsuki N, Ono H, Takatsuka H, Yamamoto T, Sangen O. Macromole-
cules 1997;30:6680e2.
[14] Kawatsuki N, Goto K, Kawakami T, Yamamoto T. Macromolecules
2002;35:706e13.
[15] (a) Jackson PO, O’Neill M, Duffy WL, Hindmarsh P, Kelly SM, Owen GJ. Chem
Mater 2001;13:694e703;
(b) Bergmann G, Jackson PO, Hogg JHC, Stirner T, O’Neill M, Duffy WL, et al.
Appl Phys Lett 2005;87:061914.
[16] Trajkovska A, Kim C, Marchall KL, Mourey TH, Chen SH. Macromolecules
2006;39:6983e9.
J Appl Phys
intensity distribution along
a polarization azimuth angle as
polarization states. The characteristics of the fabricated polari-
zation gratings and the first-order diffraction efficiencies are
shown in Fig. 12. For the grating fabricated with OL beams, the
polarization of the diffracted beams was rotated by 90 deg, when
the linearly polarized probe beam was used as plotted in Fig. 11a.
This grating reversed the rotation direction of the ꢃfirst-order
diffracted beams, when the probe beam was circularly polarized
(Fig. 11b). For the grating of fabricated with OC beams, the polar
plot of Fig. 11c shows that the circularly polarized, diffracted
beams with opposite circular rotations are obtained for a linearly
polarized probe beam. Interestingly, when the probe was
R-circularly polarized, only the þfirst order diffraction beam was
observed and the rotation direction was reversed, but the -first
order was invisible, as plotted in Fig. 11d. Furthermore, the
diffraction efficiency of the þfirst order beam was twice that of
a linearly polarized probe beam. These experimental results are
consistent with the theoretical predictions for pure polarization
gratings [33e35].
[17] (a) Xiao S, Lu X, Lu Q, Su B. Macromolecules 2008;41:3884e92;
(b) Xiao S, Lu X, Lu Q. Macromolecules 2007;40:7944e50;
(c) Zhang Q, Bazuin CG, Barret CJ. Chem Mater 2008;20:29e31.
[18] Barachevsky VA. Proc SPIE 1991;1559:184e93.
[19] Kawatsuki N, Kawakami T, Yamamoto T. Adv Mater 2001;13:1337e9.
[20] Kawatsuki N, Matsuyoshi K, Hayashi M, Takatsuka H, Yamamoto T. Chem
Mater 2000;12:1549e55.
4. Conclusion
[21] Gerhard P. In: Demus D, Goodby J, Gray GW, Spiess HW, editors. Handbook of
liquid crystals, vol. 2A. New York: Wiley-VCH; 1998. p. 128e41.
[22] Ye F, Orita A, Yaruba J, Hamada T, Otera J. Chem Lett 2004;33:528e9.
[23] (a) Okano K, Shishido A, Ikeda T. Adv Mater 2006;18:523e7;
A thermally enhanced in-plane molecular reorientation with
large birefringence was investigated in a thin PLCP (P1) film
comprised of a 4-methoxycinnamoyloxy group directly connected
with a bistolane moiety. Based on the axis-selective photoreaction
of the cinnamate groups, the generated in-plane reorientational
(b) Okano K, Tsutsumi O, Shishido A, Ikeda T.
J Am Chem Soc
2006;128:15368e9.
[24] (a) Okano K, Shishido A, Ikeda T. Macromolecules 2006;39:145e52;
(b) Yoneyama S, Yamamoto T, Tsutsumi O, Kanazawa A, Shiono T, Ikeda T.
Macromolecules 2002;35:8751e8.
[25] (a) Shishido A, Ishiguro M, Ikeda T. Chem Lett 2007;36:1146e7;
(b) Ishiguro M, Sato D, Shishido A, Ikeda T. Langmuir 2007;23:332e8.
[26] Yu H, Kobayashi T, Ge Z. Macromol Rapid Commun 2009;30:1725e30.
[27] Kitani Y, Kitamura C, Yoneda A, Kawatsuki N. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst
2005;443:181e9.
order was greater than 0.6, and the birefringence was
D
n ¼ 0.34 at
633 nm. This is the largest n value for thermally enhanced
D
molecular reorientation for materials transparent in the visible
region. In addition, we have demonstrated optical device applica-
tions, such as polarization holography. Due to the larger generated
birefringence, efficient diffraction efficiency was obtained. Further
applications using P1 films for thinner birefringent devices is
currently under investigation.
[28] (a) Kawatsuki N, Fujii Y, Kitamura C, Yoneda A. Chem Lett 2006;35:52e3;
(b) Kawatsuki N, Yamashita A, Fujii Y, Kitamura C, Yoneda A. Macromolecules
2008;41:9715e21.