C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Acknowledgment. Financial support from the NSF (CHE-
0924410) and the DFG are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Dr.
D. Borchardt (UCR) for EPR assistance.
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental details,
including the electrochemical study, absolute energies, and optimized
geometries of 2+•, and X-ray crystallographic data for 2, 2+•, and 3 in
CIF format. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
Figure 3. EPR spectra of 2+• in (left) a fluorobenzene solution at 298 K
and (right) a frozen solution at 100 K.
References
(1) For reviews, see: (a) Armstrong, A.; Chivers, T.; Boere, R. T. ACS Symp.
Ser. 2006, 917, 66. (b) Marque, S.; Tordo, P. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 250,
43. (c) Power, P. P. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 789. (d) Geoffroy, M. Recent
Res. DeV. Phys. Chem. 1998, 2, 311.
(2) For examples, see: (a) Sasamori, T.; Mieda, E.; Nagahora, N.; Sato, K.;
Shiomi, D.; Takui, Y.; Hosoi, Y.; Furukawa, Y.; Takagi, N.; Nagase, S.;
Tokitoh, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12582. (b) Ndiaye, B.; Bhat, S.;
Jouaiti, A.; Berclaz, T.; Bernardinelli, G.; Geoffroy, M. J. Phys. Chem. A
2006, 110, 9736. (c) Cataldo, L.; Dutan, C.; Misra, S. K.; Loss, S.;
Gru¨tzmacher, H.; Geoffroy, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 3463. (d) Rosa,
P.; Gouverd, C.; Bernardinelli, G.; Berclaz, T.; Geoffroy, M. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2003, 107, 4883. (e) Dutan, C.; Shah, S.; Smith, R. C.; Choua, S.; Berclaz,
T.; Geoffroy, M.; Protasiewicz, J. D. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 6241. (f) Loss,
S.; Magistrato, A.; Cataldo, L.; Hoffmann, S.; Geoffroy, M.; Ro¨thlisberger,
U.; Gru¨tzmacher, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 723. (g) Sasaki, S.;
Murakami, F.; Yoshifuji, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 340.
(3) (a) Hinchley, S. L.; Morrison, C. A.; Rankin, D. W. H.; Macdonald, C. L. B.;
Wiacek, R. J.; Cowley, A. H.; Lappert, M. F.; Gundersen, G.; Clyburne,
J. A. C.; Power, P. P. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2045. (b) Hinchley, S. L.;
Morrison, C. A.; Rankin, D. W. H.; Macdonald, C. L. B.; Wiacek, R. J.;
Voigt, A.; Cowley, A. H.; Lappert, M. F.; Gundersen, G.; Clyburne, J. A. C.;
Power, P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9045. (c) Bezombes, J. P.;
Borisenko, K. B.; Hitchcock, P. B.; Lappert, M. F.; Nycz, J. E.; Rankin,
D. W. H.; Robertson, H. E. Dalton Trans. 2004, 1980.
(4) (a) Scheer, M.; Kuntz, C.; Stubenhofer, M.; Linseis, M.; Winter, R. F.;
Sierka, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2600. (b) Ito, S.; Kikuchi,
M.; Yoshifuji, M.; Arduengo, A. J., III; Konovalova, T. A.; Kispert, L. D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4341. (c) Agarwal, P.; Piro, N. A.; Meyer,
K.; Muller, P.; Cummins, C. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3111.
(d) Armstrong, A.; Chivers, T.; Parvez, M.; Boere, R. T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 502. (e) Back, O.; Donnadieu, B.; Parameswaran, P.;
Frenking, G.; Bertrand, G. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 369.
Figure 4. Spin density for 2+• calculated at the (U)M05-2X/def2-SVP level.
Red surfaces indicate regions of R density excess.
respectively, and are comparable to those observed in the gas-phase
electron diffraction study of I (P-C, 1.85 Å; P-N, 1.62 Å).3
Moreover, the N1-C1 bond distance in 2+• (1.32 Å) is shorter than
that in 2 (1.38 Å), indicating a double bond. Collectively, these
data are in agreement with those expected for a phoshinyl radical
bearing a cationic substituent.
The room-temperature EPR spectrum of 2+• in fluorobenzene
displays a doublet of multiplets (g ) 2.007) due to a large hyperfine
coupling constant with the phosphorus nucleus [a(31P) ) 99 G]
and a small constant with one or two nitrogen nuclei [a(14N) ≈ 4
G] (Figure 3, left). The hyperfine coupling constant with P is
comparable to those observed for phosphinyl radicals I3 [a(31P) )
96.3 (Ia) and 91.8 (Ib) G], for which the odd electron resides
predominantly in a 3p(P) valence orbital. The EPR spectrum of
2+• in a frozen fluorobenzene solution at 100 K was also measured
(Figure 3, right) and simulated, allowing the determination of the
principal values of the phosphorus hyperfine coupling tensor [axx(P)
) ayy(P) ) 23 G and azz(P) ) 247 G, with gxx ) gyy ) 2.009 and
gzz ) 2.018]. These values suggest that ∼57 and ∼2% of the
unpaired electron are localized on the 3p and 3s orbitals of
phosphorus, respectively.12 Consistent with these experimental data,
calculations at the (U)M05-2X/def2-SVP level using the NBO
method13 confirmed that the spin density in 2+• is localized mainly
at phosphorus (67%) with small contributions from the nitrogen
atoms (16% for N2 and 10% for N1) (Figure 4).
(5) A radical cation featuring a phosphorus center in a remote position has
been fully characterized. See: Biaso, F.; Cantat, T.; Mezailles, N.; Ricard,
L.; Le Floch, P.; Geoffroy, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7036.
(6) Tumanskii, B.; Sheberla, D.; Molev, G.; Apeloig, Y. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 7408.
(7) (a) Matsumoto, T.; Gabbai, F. P. Organometallics 2009, 28, 4252. (b)
Walton, J. C.; Makhlouf Brahmi, M.; Fensterbank, L.; Lacoˆte, E.; Malacria,
M.; Chu, Q.; Ueng, S.-H.; Solovyev, A.; Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 2350. (c) Ueng, S.-H.; Solovyev, A.; Yuan, X.; Geib, S. J.;
Fensterbank, L.; Lacoˆte, E.; Malacria, M.; Newcomb, M.; Walton, J. C.;
Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11256.
(8) For other examples of highly reactive fragments stabilized by singlet
carbenes, see: (a) Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wei, P.; King, R. B.; Schaefer, H. F.,
III; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Robinson, G. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14970.
(b) Back, O.; Kuchenbeiser, G.; Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5530. (c) Dyker, C. A.; Lavallo, V.; Donnadieu, B.;
Bertrand, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3206. (d) Wang, Y.; Xie,
Y.; Wei, P.; King, R. B.; Schaefer, H. F., III; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Robinson,
G. H. Science 2008, 321, 1069. (e) Masuda, J. D.; Schoeller, W. W.;
Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14180. (f)
Masuda, J. D.; Schoeller, W. W.; Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7052. (g) Sidiropoulos, A.; Jones, C.; Stasch,
A.; Klein, S.; Frenking, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9701. (h)
Abraham, M. Y.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wei, P.; Schaefer, H. F., III; Schleyer,
P. v. R.; Robinson, G. H. Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 432.
To probe chemically the radical behavior of 2+•, excess nBu3SnH
in benzene was added at 25 °C. The color changed immediately
from dark-brown to light-orange. After workup, phosphine 3 was
obtained as a pale-yellow powder (Scheme 1). Notably, the
geometric parameters observed for 3 are very similar to those of
2+• (P-C, 1.84 Å; P-N, 1.68 Å; C-N, 1.31 Å), confirming again
the phosphinyl nature of the latter.
(9) King, R. B.; Sadani, N. D. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem. 1985, 15,
149.
(10) (a) Lavallo, V.; Canac, Y.; Prasang, C.; Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5705. (b) Jazzar, R.; Dewhurst, R. D.; Bourg,
J. B.; Donnadieu, B.; Canac, Y.; Bertrand, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 2899.
(11) It should be noted that 2+• cocrystallizes with various amounts of the
corresponding chlorophosphine, which likely results from the abstraction
of Cl · from residual traces of chlorine-containing reagents used in preceding
steps of the synthesis. For the structure shown in the right panel of Figure
2, 6% chlorophosphine was present.
The stability of phosphinyl radical 2+• is due partly to steric
factors but more importantly to the presence of the cationic
substituent. It prevents the dimerization observed for other phos-
phinyl radicals, such as I, by electrostatic repulsion. With the same
strategy, a variety of novel stable radicals should become accessible.
(12) Morton, J. R.; Preston, K. F. J. Magn. Reson. 1978, 30, 577.
(13) Reed, A. E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. ReV. 1988, 88, 899.
JA1046846
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 30, 2010 10263