C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
Collectively, these observations suggest that the chemistry
depicted in Scheme 1 is operative. Analysis of the 19F NMR spectra
indicated that the coordinated B(C6F5)3 in compound 3 is labile in
solution.12 Thus, the equilibrium between 3 and 2/B(C6F5)3 is rapid
and provides a source of free borane to activate the Et3SiH present
via 4, as previously reported.8 The fact that neither 3 nor 2 was
detected in the reaction mixture in the presence of silane implies
that B-H bond addition of 1 to CO2 is the rate-limiting step.
Consequently, the overall rate of silane consumption showed a
zeroth-order concentration dependence over four half-lives (∼240
min) when the reaction was monitored at 56 °C by 1H NMR
spectroscopy (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). As
the silane concentration decreased, the concentration of CH4
increased at a rate one-quarter that of silane consumption while
[1] remained constant, as expected. Once 2 was generated, the
reaction with B(C6F5)3-activated silane 4 was rapid and eventually
produced CH4 and (Et3Si)2O (as shown in Scheme 1) via well-
documented B(C6F5)3-mediated transformations.13
In accord with this postulate, the reaction of a 2:1 mixture of 2
and B(C6F5)3 (in equilibrium with 3) with Et3SiH (1.2 equiv vs 2)
at room temperature instantly afforded (Et3SiO)2CH2 (57%) along
with starting material (42%) and trace amounts of Et3SiOCH3 and
CH4, suggesting that the triethylsilylformate intermediate is highly
reactive toward 4. Therefore, its production from 2 is critical. Here,
the involvement of a silylium cation to react with anionic 2 greatly
enhances its conversion rate in comparison with that for the
reduction of 2 with further equivalents of anionic 1.7 In other words,
silylium ion transfer to the formate moiety of 2 from 4 is
Coulombically favored over hydride transfer from 1 and occurs
under much milder conditions.7 The reaction of 4 with 2 gives
highly reactive HCO2SiEt3 but also regenerates 1 for rate-limiting
activation of CO2.
B(C6F5)3 with CO2 in the presence of silane (Scheme 2). In the
absence of Et3SiH, ion pair 5 was generated and could be
characterized by X-ray crystallography.11 As with other complexes
of this type,5,6 CO2 activation is reversible, and small quantities of
free borane are accessible to added silane, which rapidly converts
5 into the triethylsilyl carbamate and 1, which in turn becomes
available for catalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4 as in Scheme 1.
In summary, ammonium borate 1 and B(C6F5)3 act in tandem to
catalytically convert CO2 to CH4 using triethylsilane as the reductant.
The rate-limiting step involves transfer of hydride from 1 to CO2,
suggesting that a more nucleophilic hydridoborate might improve the
rate of conversion. However, use of the less Lewis acidic borane B(4-
C6F4H)314 resulted in a kinetic profile essentially identical to that
obtained for B(C6F5)3 (Figure S3). Ongoing work will explore a range
of boranes, amines, and sacrificial reductants aimed at increasing the
turnover frequencies on the basis of the mechanistic details uncovered
through these detailed spectroscopic studies.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
A.B. thanks the German Research Foundation (DFG) for a
postdoctoral fellowship.
Compound 3 was generated separately by treatment of solutions
of 2 with B(C6F5)3 and was isolated by slow hexane diffusion into
the reaction mixture at -30 °C. Its solid-state structure was
elucidated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and an ORTEP
diagram is shown in Figure 1 along with selected metrical data
implying that the negative charge is delocalized over the bridging
formate and flanking borane fragments. This compound was
proposed by Ashley et al.7 as an intermediate in the conversion of
2 to [H3COB(C6F5)3]-[TMPH]+ that accepts hydride from 1; here
it serves as a reservoir of borane catalyst for hydrosilylation of 2
and subsequent intermediates.
Supporting Information Available: Crystallographic data for 3 and
5 (CIF), additional experimental and spectroscopic details, and complete
ref 1a. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) (a) Arakawa, H.; et al. Chem. ReV 2001, 101, 953–996. (b) Aresta, M.;
Dibenedetto, A. Dalton Trans. 2007, 2975–2992. (c) Jessop, P. G.; Joo´,
F.; Tai, C.-C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2004, 248, 2425–2442. (d) Sakakura, T.;
Choi, J.-C.; Yasuda, H. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 2365–2387.
(2) (a) Kayaki, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Ikariya, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 4194–4197. (b) Gu, L.; Zhang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 914–
915. (c) Nair, V.; Varghese, V.; Paul, R. R.; Jose, A.; Sinu, C. R.; Menon,
R. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2653–2655.
(3) Riduan, S. N.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, J. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
3322–3325.
(4) Stephan, D. W.; Erker, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 46–76.
(5) Mo¨mming, C. M.; Otten, E.; Kehr, G.; Fro¨hlich, R.; Grimme, S.; Stephan,
D. W.; Erker, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6643–6646.
(6) Me´nard, G.; Stephan, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1796–1797.
(7) Ashley, A. E.; Thompson, A. L.; O’Hare, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 9839–9843.
(8) (a) Parks, D. J.; Piers, W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9440–9441. (b)
Parks, D. J.; Blackwell, J. M.; Piers, W. E. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3090–3098.
(9) (a) Blackwell, J. M.; Morrison, D. J.; Piers, W. E. Tetrahedron 2002, 58,
8247–8254. (b) Chojnowski, J.; Rubinsztajn, S.; Cella, J. A.; Fortuniak,
W.; Cypryk, M.; Kurjata, J.; Kazmierski, K. Organometallics 2005, 24,
6077–6084. (c) Thompson, D. B.; Brook, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 32–33.
(10) Sumerin, V.; Schulz, F.; Nieger, M.; Leskela¨, M.; Repo, T.; Rieger, B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6001–6003.
(11) See the Supporting Information for experimental details.
(12) 19F NMR spectra of mixtures of 2 and various amounts of B(C6F5)3 in
C6D5Br exhibited broad resonances consistent with the presence of 2, 3,
and free B(C6F5)3 in rapid equilibrium.
(13) This mechanistic scheme is similar in form to that proposed for a
Zr/B(C6F5)3-based catalytic system for the slow hydrosilation of CO2. See:
Matsuo, T.; Kawaguchi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12362–12363.
(14) Ullrich, M.; Lough, A. J.; Stephan, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
52–53.
Figure 1. ORTEP plot for 3 (50% thermal displacement ellipsoids).
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C1-O1, 1.256(3); C1-O2,
1.268(3); O1-B1, 1.587(3); O2-B2, 1.584(3); O1-C1-O2, 120.2(2); O1/
2-C1-H, 119.9. The largest deviation from the least-squares plane through
atoms B1, O1, C1, O2, and B2 is 0.015 Å for O1.
The above experiments were performed with isolated 1, but this
can be bypassed simply through the use of a 2:1 mixture of TMP/
JA105320C
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 31, 2010 10661