Macromolecules
Article
where, μ is the dipole moment, C is the concentration (1 mol/
m3), εTHF and nTHF, are the measured permittivity and refractive
index of the solvent (THF), ε∞ is the high frequency limit of
the dielectric permittivity (obtained from the measured
refractive index as ε∞=n2), ε0 is the permittivity of vacuum,
kB is Boltzmann’s constant and NA is Avogandro’s number.
From the fit to eq4, assuming that all ions form pairs, we obtain
dipole moments in the range from 60 to 70 D for 2 and in the
range from 30 to 40 D for 10 and 11. These are reasonable
values in accord with the degree of ion dissociation discussed
earlier. For example, in 2 the dipole moment of an ion pair (μ =
e(r+ + r−)) is estimated as 74 D, and this values is in good
agreement with the experimental values since the majority of
ions are associated (Figure 6). In the larger phosphonium ions
the measured dipole momentunder the assumption that all
ions form pairsis below the calculated one for paired ions
(∼180 D in 11) since in this case most ions are dissociated
(Figure 6).
with potential applications in catalytic processes. Despite a high
degree of ion dissociation the effect of increasing cation size on
dc-conductivity is only moderate. The latter reflects the balance
between ion dissociation, which is promoted by the bulky ions,
and charge transport, which is inhibited by the large ions.
Finally, the effect of ion valency is to increase the characteristic
escape length.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Synthesis and DOSY-NMR and dielectric spectroscopy. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
Because of ion association, the diffusion coefficients
measured by DOSY-NMR (Dexp) at 298 K (Table S1,
Supporting Information) are not the diffusion coefficients of
the free ions but represent some average of the fully dissociated
and paired states.15 This is shown in Figure 8 that compares the
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
Financial support by DFG Priority Program SPP 1355, SFP
1459, and the SFB 635 is acknowledged. The current work was
supported by the Research unit on Dynamics and Thermody-
namics of the UoI cofinanced by the European Union and the
Greek state under NSRF 2007-2013 (Region of Epirus, call 18).
This work was cofinanced by the E.U. European Social Fund
and the Greek Ministry of Development GSRT in the
framework of the program THALIS.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Morrison, I. D. Colloid Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1993, 71,
1−37.
(2) Parent, M. E.; Yang, J.; Jeon, Y.; Toney, M. F.; Zhou, Z.-L.;
Henzer, D. Langmuir 2011, 27, 11845.
(3) van der Hoeven, P. H. C.; Lyklema, J. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
1992, 42, 205−277.
(4) Klinkenberg, A.; der Minne, J. L. Electrostatics in the Petroleum
Industry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1958.
Figure 8. Measured (T = 298 K) DOSY-NMR diffusion coefficients
for the anion (D−) (red symbols) and the cation (D+) (blue symbols)
plotted as a function of the cation size. Calculated anion (red) and
cation (blue) diffusion coefficients corresponding to unassociated ions.
(5) Bjerrum, N. Kgl. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat.-fys. Medd. 1926, 7, 1.
(6) Krossing, I.; Raabe, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2066.
(7) Barbarich, T. J.; Handy, S. T.; Miller, S. M.; Anderson, O. P.;
Grieco, P. A.; Strauss, S. H. Organometallics 1996, 15, 3776.
(8) Chen, E. Y.-X.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1391.
(9) Raabe, I.; Wagner, K.; Guttsche, K.; Wang, M.; Gratzel, M.;
̈
measured diffusion coefficients (symbols) for the different
anion sizes/generations at 298 K with the calculated ones (from
the Stokes−Einstein relation, Di = kBT/6πηri) (lines)
corresponding to unassociated ions. For the larger cations,
the measured and calculated diffusion coefficients are in
reasonable agreement, since the degree of ion association is
low. For the smaller cations, however, the NMR diffusion
coefficients underestimate/overestimate the respective cation/
anion diffusion coefficients with regard to the free ions as a
result of the stronger ion association.
Santiso-Quinones, G.; Krossing, I. Chem.Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1966.
̃
(10) Stewart, M. P.; Paradee, L. M.; Raabe, I.; Trapp, N.; Slattery, J.
S.; Krossing, I.; Geiger, W. E. J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 1091.
(11) Geiger, W. E.; Barrier
(12) Krossing, I.; Reisinger, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2721.
(13) Bosmann, A.; Francio, G.; Janssen, E.; Solinas, M.; Leitner, W.;
Wasserscheid, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2697.
̀
e, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1030.
̀
̈
(14) Turp, D.; Wagner, M.; Enkelmann, V.; Mullen, K. Angew. Chem.,
̈
̈
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4962−4965.
(15) Mpoukouvalas, K.; Turp, D.; Wagner, M.; Mullen, K.; Butt, H.-
J.; Floudas, G. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 5801−5806.
(16) Moritz, R.; Baumgarten, M.; Mullen, K. Manuscript in
̈
̈
̈
IV. CONCLUSIONS
preparation.
The synthesis of extremely large, bulky, and stable cations and
anions resulted in molecularly defined ions that provide a route
toward the goal of truly noncoordinating ions in solvents of low
polarity. Employing a large borate anion and by systematically
varying the size of the cation we approached the theoretical
Bjerrum length. This procedure results in superweak cations
(17) Broandband Dielectric Spectroscopy; Kremer, F., Schonhals, A.,
̈
Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2003.
(18) Floudas, G. Dielectric Spectroscopy. In Polymer Science: A
Comprehensive Reference; Matyjaszewski, K., Moller, M., Eds.; Elsevier
̈
BV: Amsterdam, 2012; Vol. 2.32, pp 825−845.
(19) Dyre, J. C. J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 64, 2456−2468.
E
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma402137x | Macromolecules XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX