Ridge-Tile-like Complexes
A R T I C L E S
mization can be a serious issue; a noticeable epimerization on
storage has already been reported for 4.3
The configurational stability of the enantiomers of 1, 2, and
3 is hopefully related to the strength of the coordination of the
nickel with the nitrogen of the imine and/or the nickel with the
nitrogen of the tertiary amine. The three structures under study
and the diastereomeric pair 4 all include relatively basic tertiary
amines. Therefore, the configurational stability should be high
enough to permit a separation of the corresponding enantiomers
using liquid chromatography with a chiral stationary phase.
Screening of various CSPs (see the Supporting Information)
showed that the (S,S)-Whelk-O1 column from Regis was
sufficiently efficient in separating the enantiomers of compounds
1, 2, and 3 as well as the diastereomers of 4 using a mobile
phase composed of a mixture of hexane and an alcohol (EtOH
or 2-PrOH): hexane/EtOH (1:1 v:v) for 1, hexane/2-PrOH (8:2
v/v) for 2, and pure EtOH for 3. The peaks of the two
enantiomers were consistently sharp with baseline separation
yielding good resolution values: 2.55 for 1, 4.52 for 2, and 3.53
for 3. The chromatograms did not show any plateau, a diagnostic
for exchange between the enantiomers on the column.6 The
configurational stability of the enantiomers at room temperature
was further confirmed during the check of their optical purity
after semipreparative separation and careful evaporation of the
solvent. Online CD detection at 390 nm showed that the first
eluted enantiomers for compounds 1, 2, and 3 all gave a (+)
CD390 sign. The CD390 sign of the first eluted diastereomer (less
stable minor-4) of 4 is (-), indicative of a possible inversion
of elution order between the diastereomers of 4 and the
enantiomers of 1, 2, and 3 on the Whelk column. ECD and
VCD spectrocopies (see below) prove that the first eluted
diastereomer (less stable minor-4) of 4 has an opposite joining-
edge absolute configuration to the first eluted enantiomers in
the series 1, 2, 3. These results show once again that liquid
chromatography with chiral stationary phases is a very powerful
method to separate enantiomers or diastereomers, but they also
show that chiral HPLC cannot be used safely to assign the
absolute configuration based upon elution order alone even on
a given chiral stationary phase.7 Semipreparative separations
Figure 2. Absolute configuration nomenclature and selected enantiomer
structures from the X-ray data of racemic 1, 2, and 3. The dotted lines
were added to highlight the roof-tile shape of the edge-sharing square planar
binuclear complexes of Ni(II).
reaction still await more comprehensive studies, this result
strongly supports the in situ formation of the intermediates 8
and 8′ (Scheme 2b), which can undergo further homo- or
heterodimerization leading to symmetric or scrambled products.
The racemic products 1 and 3 were selected for this study
and purified to analytical purity via column chromatography.
The structures of compounds 1, 2, and 3 were confirmed by
single crystal X-ray analysis.
Resolution of Enantiomers. The X-ray data of compounds 1,
2, and 3 showed that two enantiomers are observed in the solid
state. While the X-ray data provide useful starting geometries
of the enantiomers, which were used for further structure
optimization, they do not shed light on the configurational
stability of this type of chiral compound in solution. Figure 2
defines the absolute configuration nomenclature and illustrates
the enantiomers (P)-1, (P)-2, and (P)-3 as they appeared in the
X-ray data. (Note: In the absence of established rules for the
absolute stereochemistry nomenclature in this type of metal
complex, it was now considered far more convenient and
straightforward to use axial chirality with the chirality axis
represented by the edge shared by the two square planar
complexes. Unfortunately, this is an inverse nomenclature for
the (M) and (P) forms as compared to the previous article, which
was based upon helical chirality for the diastereomers of
compound 4. In the current Article and the Supporting Informa-
tion, the X-ray structures of the assigned forms are reported to
illustrate the absolute configuration without ambiguity.)
(5) For some recent semi-preparative separations of metal complexes on
chiral support, see: (a) Norel, L.; Rudolph, M.; Vanthuyne, N.;
Williams, J. A. G.; Lescop, C.; Roussel, C.; Autschbach, J.; Crassous,
J.; Reau, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 99–102. (b) Setsune,
J.-I.; Tsukajima, A.; Okasaki, N.; Lintuluoto, J. M.; Lintuluoto, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 771–775. (c) Lai, R.; Chanon, F.;
Roussel, C.; Sanz, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Daran, J.-C. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2008, 693, 23–32. (d) Rang, A.; Engeser, M.; Maier, N. M.;
Nieger, M.; Lindner, W.; Schalley, C. A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2008, 14,
3855–3859. (e) Sun, P.; Krishnan, A.; Yadav, A.; Singh, S.; Mac-
Donnell, F. M.; Armstrong, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 10312–
10320. (f) Warnke, M. M.; Cotton, F. A.; Armstrong, D. W. Chirality
2007, 19, 179–183. (g) Chen, X.; Okamoto, Y.; Yano, T.; Otsuki, J.
J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 713–716. (h) Lassen, P. R.; Guy, L.; Karame,
I.; Roisnel, T.; Vanthuyne, N.; Roussel, C.; Cao, X.; Lombardi, R.;
Crassous, J.; Freedman, T. B.; Nafie, L. A. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45,
10230–10239. (i) Paisner, S. N.; Bergman, R. G. J. Organomet. Chem.
2001, 621, 242–245. (j) Ciclosi, M.; Lloret, J.; Estevan, F.; Lahuerta,
P.; Sanau, M.; Pe´rez-Prieto, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6742–
6744.
To study the unique chiroptical properties and assign the
absolute configurations of the enantiomers with intact chirality,
they need to be isolated. Provided the racemization of the
isolated enantiomer is limited or nonexistent,4,5 the method of
choice for the enantiomer resolution of compounds 1, 2, and 3
is HPLC with chiral stationary phases (CSP). However, race-
(6) For exchange processes on the chiral column, see: (a) Schurig, V.
J. Chromatogr., A 2009, 1216, 1723–1736. (b) Wolf, C. Chem. Soc.
ReV. 2005, 34, 595–608. (c) Trapp, O. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 189–
198. (d) Trapp, O. Chirality 2006, 18, 489–497. (e) Vanthuyne, N.;
Andreoli, F.; Fernandez, S.; Roman, M.; Roussel, C. Lett. Org. Chem.
2005, 2, 433–443. (f) Roussel, C.; Vanthuyne, N.; Bouchekara, M.;
Djafri, A.; Elguero, J.; Alkorta, I. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 403–411.
(7) Review: Roussel, C.; Del Rio, A.; Pierrot-Sanders, J.; Piras, P.;
Vanthuyne, N. J. Chromatogr., A 2004, 1037, 311–3.
(4) Piras, P.; Roussel, C. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2008, 46, 839–847.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 30, 2010 10479