Mendeleev Commun., 2013, 23, 215–216
compounds whose configuration was determined by XRD.10,11
In turn, this specifies the regioselectivity in the formation of
target products 4a–e.
However, the possible intermediates were never detected. One
should take into account that alkylation of Biginelli compounds
with dibromoethane18 or haloacetic acids19 under mild conditions
initially gives a product of substitution at the sulfur atom, which
then undergoes intramolecular cyclization at the N(1) atom.18
Therefore, in our case it can be assumed that initially the reac-
tion in the presence of TEA affords intermediate 3 with the most
energeticallypreferablesystemofconjugatedbonds[C(4)=N(3)],
whose stabilization is favoured by the carboxy moiety, which
leads to individual isomers 4a–e.
The data derived from NMR studies were ultimately confirmed
by XRD data for compound 4c.‡ The general view of compound
4c is shown in Figure 1. The benzothiazole moiety is planar, while
the dihydropyrimidine ring annelated with it deviates from a
planar structure towards a boat conformation [the N(1) and C(4)
atoms deviate from the plane]. In agreement with the prediction
based on NMR data, the methoxyphenyl substituent occupies an
axial position. It is rotated almost perpendicularly relative to the
plane of the tricyclic moiety [the interplanar angle is 82.46(2)°],
whereas the pseudo-torsional angle H(4)C(4)C(6)H(6) is 47°,
which corresponds to the closest approach of the hydrogen atoms.
The most interesting feature in the process we studied is that
the rare for thioamides sequential intramolecular SNAr reac-
tions12,13 readily occur. This can be explained by the Smiles
rearrangement.14–16 In reactions between BNPN and mono- or
bifunctional O-, N-, S-nucleophiles, the reactive bromine atom
was replaced first, usually to stall on monosubstitution products.17
In order to study the regularities of the reaction of substrate 1
with bifunctional pyrimidine S,N-nucleophiles 2a–e in detail,
monitoring of the process was attempted by NMR spectroscopy.
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2013.07.012.
References
1 C. O. Kappe, Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 6937.
2 Suresh and J. S. Sandhu, ARKIVOC, 2012, i, 66.
3 S. V. Vdovina and V. A. Mamedov, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2008, 77, 1017
(Usp. Khim., 2008, 77, 1091).
4 M. M. Van der Walt, G. Terre’Blanche, A. C. U. Lourens, A. Petzer and
J. P. Petzer, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2012, 22, 7367.
5 A. A. Pavlenko, Kh. S. Shikhaliev, A. Yu. Potapov and D. V. Krylsky,
Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., 2005, 41, 689 (Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin.,
2005, 796).
6 L. Nagarapu, H. K. Gaikwad, J. D. Palem, R. Venkatesh, R. Bantu and
B. Srid, Synth. Commun., 2013, 43, 93.
N(1)
S(1)
C(9A)
C(1)
7 K.-C. Liu and L.-Y. Hsu, Arch. Pharm., 1987, 320, 569.
8 S. I. Filimonov, Zh. V. Chirkova, I. G. Abramov, S. I. Firgang, G. A.
Stashina and K. Yu. Suponitsky, Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 46.
9 I. G. Abramov and S. I. Filimonov, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Khim.
Khim. Tekhnol., 2011, 54, 3 (in Russian).
C(10A)
C(2)
C(9)
C(8)
O(3)
C(3')
N(5)
C(5A)
C(6)
C(3)
C(1')
C(2')
C(4)
C(19)
N(4)
C(12)
C(7)
10 D.-H. Wu, Y.-H. Zhang and Z.-F. Li, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E, 2009,
O(2)
C(11)
C(16)
E65, o1733.
C(18)
N(3)
11 P. Zhao, R. Shangguan, H. Wang, Y. Qing and F. Jian, Spectrochim.
Acta, Part A, 2009, 72, 61.
12 A. V. Smirnov, I. G. Abramov and S. A. Ivanovskii, Heterocycles, 2001,
C(13)
C(14)
O(1)
C(15)
55, 1161.
13 I. G. Abramov, A. V. Smirnov, L. S. Kalandadze, N. P. Gerasimova,
N. A. Nozhnin and V. N. Sakharov, Chem. Heterocycl. Compd., 2005,
41, 238 (Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 2005, 270).
C(17)
14 T. N. Gerasimova and E. F. Kolchina, Russ. Chem. Rev., 1995, 64, 133
(Usp. Khim., 1995, 64, 142).
15 T. R. M. Rauws, C. Biancalani, J. W. De Schutter and B. U. W. Maes,
Figure 1 General view of molecule 4c in representation of atoms by
thermal displacement ellipsoids at 50% probability level.
Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 6958.
16 Y. Zhao, Ya. Wu, J. Jia, D. Zhang and Ch. Ma, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77,
8501.
17 I. G. Abramov, M. V. Dorogov, S. A. Ivanovskii, A. V. Smirnov and
M. B. Abramova, Mendeleev Commun., 2000, 78.
18 C. O. Kappe and P. Roschger, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1989, 26, 55.
19 B. Pan, R. Huang, L. Zheng, C. Chen, S. Han, D. Qub, M. Zhu and
P. Wie, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2011, 46, 819.
Method B. Pyrimidinethione 2a–e (0.01 mol), BNPN 1 (0.01 mol) and
TEA (0.022 mol) were mixed in isopropyl alcohol (20 ml). The mixture
was refluxed for 4–8 h, then cooled. The precipitate that formed was
filtered off and recrystallized from ethanol. The yield is somewhat higher
in this method and the product is well purified by recrystallization, so the
yields are given for method B.
Ethyl 7,8-dicyano-2-methyl-4-phenyl-4H-pyrimido[2,1-b][1,3]benzo-
thiazole-3-carboxylate 4a: yield 67%, mp 218–220°C (decomp.). IR
(n/cm–1): 2232 (CºN), 1684 (C=O), 1605 (C=C), 1588 (Ar), 1243 (C–O–C).
1H NMR, d: 1.21 (t, 3H, Me, J 7.1 Hz), 2.34 (s, 3H, Me), 4.08 (dq, 2H,
CH2, J 7.1 Hz), 6.58 (s, 1H, 4-H), 7.25 (t, 1H, 4'-H, J 7.5 Hz), 7.33 (t, 2H,
3'-H, 5'-H, J 7.5 Hz), 7.51 (d, 2H, 2'-H, 6'-H, J 7.5 Hz), 8.28 (s, 1H, 9-H),
8.47 (s, 1H, 6-H). MS, m/z (%): 400 [M+] (24), 371 [M+ – Et] (27), 327
(72), 323 (100), 295 (42), 249 (29), 225 (44), 184 (24), 128 (19), 115 (15),
77 (18). Found (%): C, 65.85; H, 3.96; N, 13.93. Calc. for C22H16N4O2S
(%): C, 65.99; H, 4.03; N, 13.99.
Ethyl 7,8-dicyano-2-methyl-4-(2-thienyl)-4H-pyrimido[2,1-b][1,3]benzo-
thiazole-3-carboxylate 4d: yield 78%, mp 246–248°C (decomp.). IR
(n/cm–1): 2233 (CºN), 1670 (C=O), 1602 (C=C), 1245 (C–O–C). 1H NMR,
d: 1.23 (t, 3H, Me, J 7.1 Hz), 2.35 (s, 3H, Me), 4.13 (dq, 2H, CH2,
J 7.1 Hz), 6.93 (dd, 1H, 4'-H, J 3.5 Hz, J 5.0 Hz), 6.95 (s, 1H, 4-H), 7.25
(d, 1H, 3'-H, J 3.5 Hz), 7.42 (d, 1H, 5'-H, J 5.0 Hz), 8.50 (s, 1H, 9-H),
8.57 (s, 1H, 6-H). MS, m/z (%): 406 [M+] (38), 377 [M+ – Et] (21), 361
[M+ – OEt] (18), 333 [M+ – COOEt] (72), 250 (15), 225 (18), 184 (30),
101 (28), 58 (100), 42 (51). Found (%): C, 58.98; H, 3.56; N, 13.72. Calc.
for C20H14N4O2S2 (%): C, 59.10; H, 3.47; N, 13.78.
20 S. A. Ivanovskii, M. V. Dorogov, I. G. Abramov and A. V. Smirnov,
RF Patent, 2167855, 2001 (Chem. Abstr., 2002, 137, 124990).
21 E. H. Hu, D. R. Sidler and U.-H. Dolling, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 3454.
Received: 11th March 2013; Com. 13/4084
‡
Crystal data for 4c. Crystals of C23H18N4O3S are monoclinic, space
group P21/n: a = 13.1107(3), b = 10.8298(3) and c = 14.6076(4) Å, b =
= 104.2200(10)°, V = 2010.53(9)Å3, Z = 4, M = 430.47, dcalc = 1.422 g cm–3,
m = 0.196 mm–1. 27642 reflections were collected by a SMART APEX II
CCD diffractometer [l(MoKa) = 0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator,
w-scans, 2q < 62°] at 100 K. The structure was solved by the direct
methods and refined by the full-matrix least-squares procedure in aniso-
tropic approximation. 6399 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0332) were
used in the refinement procedure that converged to wR2 = 0.0937 calcu-
lated on Fh2kl [GOF = 1.020, R1 = 0.0354 calculated on Fhkl using 5308
reflections with I > 2s(I)].
CCDC 923901 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for
this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge
For details, see ‘Notice to Authors’, Mendeleev Commun., Issue 1, 2013.
For characteristics of compounds 4b,c,e, see Online Supplementary
Materials.
– 216 –