C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
force field, as implemented in the Scigress Explorer 7.7 program.
Barnard et al.14 found evidence for the formation of a discrete
sequence of truncated octahedral morphological motifs for gold NPs
over 1.5 nm. The particle formed is therefore described by the
formula Au201[Y-Dt(H2O)2]56 (Figure 2). The Au/Y ratio used was
3.6, corresponding to the mean Au/Gd ratio determined by
ICP-MS.
Visual inspection of a space-filling model (see Figure S4 in the
SI) shows that the spherical shell formed by the Y-Dt chelates is
densely packed. From the simple model, it can be deduced that the
thickness of the spherical shell is 1.3 ( 0.3 nm, corresponding in
this particular case roughly to the radius of the gold core. The total
diameter of the modeled particle is ∼4.9 nm and corresponds to
the mean diameter of the Gd-DtNP measured by DLS.
respectively) (Table S3 in the SI). The results for the transient ZFS
are close to the values found for the Ru-based metallostar
21
{Ru[Gd2bpy-DTTA2(H2O)4]3}4-
,
which is built using the same
chelating unit. However, the amplitude of the static ZFS is ∼30%
lower than that for {Ru[Gd2bpy-DTTA2(H2O)4]3}4-. A global
298
rotational correlation time τR ) 1.2 ns was calculated for Gd-
DtNPs. The dense packing of the Gd-Dt units on the surface of the
NPs makes them very rigid. The absence of internal rotation of the
Gd-chelating units leads to a very good fit, even at high NMR
frequencies (ν g 200 MHz).
In conclusion, we have developed small, stable, water-dispersible,
DTTA thiol-functionalized gold NPs complexed with paramagnetic
gadolinium or diamagnetic yttrium rare-earth ions. Characterizations
using TEM images, DLS, and STEM-EDX analysis indicated a
particle size distribution from 1 to 13 nm. Bulk magnetic suscep-
tibility measurements at high magnetic field showed the absence
of a significant magnetic contribution from the gold core. NMRD
profiles of Gd-DtNP solutions at 25 °C showed very high relax-
ivities with marked relaxivity humps between 10 and 60 MHz,
indicating slow rotational motion.
Thiol-covered gold nanoparticles are known to show magnetic
behavior.11 In view of the goal of creating particles that potentially
can act as MRI contrast agents, any magnetic property of the particle
is of natural interest. We determined the effective magnetic moment
1
(µeff) per gadolinium ion in different dilutions of Gd-DtNP by H
NMR analysis using Evans’ method.15,16 The µeff values of the
solutions obtained from the experimental chemical shifts (Table
S2 in the SI) are in close accordance with the effective magnetic
moment of Gd3+ [µeff(Gd3+) ) 7.94]. No magnetic moment was
detected from 1H NMR shifts of the Y-DtNP solution, even at the
high magnetic field of 18.8 T. The gold core of the NP therefore
does not contribute significantly to the overall magnetic moment
of Gd-DtNPs.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Swiss NSF
and the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-07-JCJC-
0040) and was performed in the frame of the EU COST Action
D38. We thank Prof. Hon. Andre´ Merbach and Dr. Alain Borel
for very helpful discussions and Dr. Marco Cantoni and Anas Mouti
for TEM images and the STEM-EDX experiment.
Supporting Information Available: Tables S1-S3 and Figures
S1-S5. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) McCarthy, J. R.; Weissleder, R. AdV. Drug DeliVery ReV. 2008, 60, 1241–
1251.
(2) Debbage, P.; Jaschke, W. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 130, 845–875.
(3) Caravan, P.; Farrar, C. T.; Frullano, L.; Uppal, R. Contrast Med. Mol.
Imaging 2008, 4, 89–100.
(4) Hainfeld, J. F.; Dilmanian, F. A.; Slatkin, D. N.; Smilowitz, H. M. J. Pharm.
Pharmacol. 2008, 60, 977–985.
(5) Debouttiere, P.-J.; Roux, S.; Vocanson, F.; Billotey, C.; Beuf, O.; Favre-
Reguillon, A.; Lin, Y.; Pellet-Rostaing, S.; Lamartine, R.; Perriat, P.;
Tillement, O. AdV. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2330–2339.
(6) Alric, C.; Taleb, J.; Le Duc, G.; Mandon, C.; Billotey, C.; Le Meur-Herland,
A.; Brochard, T.; Vocanson, F.; Janier, M.; Perriat, P.; Roux, S.; Tillement,
O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5908–5915.
(7) Park, J.-A.; Reddy, P. A. N.; Kim, H.-K.; Kim, I.-S.; Kim, G.-C.; Chang,
Y.; Kim, T.-J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 6135–6137.
(8) Carmeli, I.; Leitus, G.; Naaman, R.; Reich, S.; Vager, Z. J. Chem. Phys.
2003, 118, 10372–10375.
(9) De La Fuente, J. M.; Alca´ntara, D.; Eaton, P.; Crespo, P.; Rojas, T. C.;
Ferna´ndez, A.; Hernando, A.; Penade´s, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110,
13021–13028.
(10) Guerrero, E.; Rojas, T. C.; Multigner, M.; Crespo, P.; Munoz-Marquez,
M. A.; Garcia, M. A.; Hernando, A.; Fernandez, A. Acta Mater. 2007, 55,
1723–1730.
Figure 3. 1H NMRD profile for Gd-DtNPs at 298 K and the fit using the
modified Florence approach.
The nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion (NMRD) profiles of
Gd-DtNP were measured at 25 °C (Figure 3). Both Gd-DtNP
batches led to very similar relaxivities (r1). A very high relaxivity
maximum of ∼60 mM-1 s-1 at 30 MHz was found, corresponding
to a relaxation enhancement per NP of more than 3000 mM-1 s-1
.
Tillement6 and Kim7 both used ligands chelating several Gd3+ ions,
leading to lower relaxivities but higher relaxation enhancements
per NP. Various theoretical approaches have been developed to
analyze NMRD profiles of gadolinium compounds.17 We used the
approach of Bertini et al.18 and Kruk et al.,19 which has been
implemented in the software package developed in Florence and
is called the “modified Florence method”.20 This method is well-
(11) Garitaonandia, J. S.; Insausti, M.; Goikolea, E.; Suzuki, M.; Cashion, J. D.;
Kawamura, N.; Ohsawa, H.; De Muro, I. G.; Suzuki, K.; Plazaola, F.; Rojo,
T. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 661–667.
(12) Crespo, P.; Guerrero, E.; Mu´noz-Ma´rquez, M. A.; Hernando, A.; Ferna´ndez,
A. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2008, 44, 2768–2771.
(13) Moriggi, L.; Cannizzo, C.; Prestinari, C.; Berrie`re, F.; Helm, L. Inorg. Chem.
2008, 47, 8357–8366.
(14) Barnard, A. S.; Curtiss, L. A. ChemPhysChem 2006, 7, 1544–1553.
(15) Evans, D. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 2003–2005.
(16) Evans, D. F.; Fazakerley, G. V.; Phillips, R. F. J. Chem. Soc. A 1971,
1931–1934.
suited for fitting the experimental NMRD profiles for slowly rotating
(17) Kowalewski, J.; Kruk, D.; Parigi, G. AdV. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 57, 41–104.
(18) Bertini, I.; Kowalewski, J.; Luchinat, C.; Nilsson, T.; Parigi, G. J. Chem.
Phys. 1999, 111, 5795–5807.
7
complexes of gadolinium(III), an S )
/ ion characterized by
2
relatively low static zero-field splitting (ZFS).
(19) Kruk, D.; Nilsson, T.; Kowalewski, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3,
4907–4917.
The data fitting was performed by fixing most of the parameters
to values typical for Gd complexes with the DTTA chelating
unit. The four parameters fitted were the overall rotational correla-
tion time (τR298), the correlation time for the transient ZFS (τv298),
and the amplitudes of the transient and static ZFS (∆t2 and ∆s2,
(20) Bertini, I.; Galas, O.; Luchinat, C.; Parigi, G. J. Magn. Reson. 1995, 113A,
151–158.
(21) Moriggi, L.; Aebischer, A.; Cannizzo, C.; Sour, A.; Borel, A.; Bu¨nzli, J. C.;
Helm, L. Dalton Trans. 2009, 2088–2095.
JA904094T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 31, 2009 10829