C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 5a
Using the indium protocol developed by Marshall et al.11a and
S-configured propargylic mesylate 17, the reaction was performed
with high selectivities (anti/syn > 10:1) and provided 13 in good
yields (68%) (Scheme 3). The subsequent standard transformations
established allyl bromide 16.
Scheme 3a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 17, Pd(OAc)2, ·PPh3, InI, THF-HMPA,
68%; (b) TBAF (5% H2O), 83%; (c) TBSOTf, 2,6-lutidine, 99%; (d) PPTS,
MeOH, 65%; (e) CBr4, PPh3, 99%.
Aldehyde 4 was derived from acid 18 through a sequence of
esterification and standard oxazole formation.12 DiBAl-H reduction
established the aldehyde functionality required for the Wittig
olefination with 5.13 The subsequent olefination installed the new
double bond with high selectivity (E/Z > 10:1). At that stage it
proved beneficial to remove the PMB protecting group prior to the
functionalization of the alkyne. For this transformation the pal-
ladium-catalyzed hydrostannylation provided the highest yields and
regioselectivities. Finally, the allylic alcohol was converted to the
corresponding allyl bromide 20 (Scheme 4).
a Reagents and conditions: (a) PBu3, MeCN; (b) KOtBu, toluene, 48%
(over 2 steps); (c) PdCl2(PhCN)2, DMF; (d) HF-pyridine, pyridine, 18%
(over 2 steps).
mischen Industrie for a FONDS-fellowship for T.B. is gratefully
acknowledged. We thank R. Jansen (HZI) for providing an authentic
sample and S. Eichner for HPLC assistance.
Scheme 4a
Supporting Information Available: Spectroscopic and analytical
data as well as experimental procedures for all compounds described
herein. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) (a) Jansen, R.; Irschik, H.; Reichenbach, H.; Ho¨fle, G. Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1997, 8, 1725–1732. (b) Brodmann, T.; Lorenz, M.; Scha¨ckel, R.; Simsek,
S.; Kalesse, M. Synlett 2009, 2, 174–192.
(2) Diestel, R.; Irschik, H.; Jansen, R.; Khalil, M. W.; Reichenbach, H.; Sasse,
F. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 2900–2903.
(3) For cytochalasin D, see: (a) Lin, D. C.; Lin, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1979, 76, 2345–2349. (b) Flanagan, M. D.; Lin, S. J. Biol. Chem. 1980,
255, 835–838. (c) MacLean-Fletcher, S.; Pollard, T. D. Cell 1980, 20, 329–
341. For condramides, see: (d) Kunze, B.; Jansen, R.; Sasse, F.; Ho¨fle, G.;
Reichenbach, H. J. Antibiot. 1995, 48, 1262–1266. (e) Eggert, U.; Diestel,
R.; Sasse, F.; Jansen, R.; Kunze, B.; Kalesse, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 6478–6482. For rizopodin, see: (f) Sasse, F.; Steinmetz, H.; Ho¨fle,
G.; Reichenbach, H. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 741–748.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) SerOMe•HCl, EDC•HCl, HOBT, i-Pr2NEt,
78%; (b) DAST, CH2Cl2; (c) DBU, BrCCl3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C; (d) DiBAl-H,
toluene, 70% 3 steps; (e) PBu3, MeCN; (f) KOtBu, toluene, 91% (over 2
steps); (g) DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O, 63%; (h) (i) Bu3SnH, (PPh3)2PdCl2; (ii) I2,
THF, 67%; (j) (i) MsCl, Et3N; (ii) LiBr, THF, 82%.
(4) Janssen, D.; Albert, D.; Jansen, R.; Mu¨ller, R.; Kalesse, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4898–4901.
With both hemispheres in hand we continued to establish the
E-configured double bond between C25 and C26 using a Wittig
reaction. Without further functional group transformations the
intramolecular Stille14 reaction followed to establish the carbon
framework of chivosazole. The final global deprotection using
buffered HF then completed the total synthesis of chivosazole F
(Scheme 5). The spectroscopic data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS,
optical rotation) were in all respect identical to the data originally
reported by Ho¨fle and co-workers thus confirming the previously
made configurational assignment.
In summary, the first total synthesis of (-)-chivosazole F has
been achieved through a strategy that establishes the delicate
polyene systems using late-stage Wittig reactions and an intramo-
lecular Stille coupling as the pivotal transformations for their
constructions.
(5) (a) Reid, R.; Piagentini, M.; Rodriguez, E.; Ashley, G.; Viswanathan, N.;
Carney, J.; Santi, D. V.; Hutchinson, C. R.; McDaniel, R. Biochemistry
2003, 42, 72–79. (b) Caffrey, P. ChemBioChem 2003, 4, 654–657.
(6) Paterson, I.; Kan, S. B. J.; Gibson, L. J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3724–3727.
(7) Brodmann, T.; Janssen, D.; Sasse, F.; Irschik, H.; Jansen, R.; Mu¨ller, R.;
Kalesse, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 5155-5159.
(8) Janssen, D.; Kalesse, M. Synlett 2007, 17, 2667–2670.
(9) Ghosh, A. K.; Wang, Y.; Kim, J. T. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8973–8982.
(10) Mapp, A. K.; Heathcock, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 23–27.
(11) (a) Marshall, J. A.; Eidam, P.; Schenk Eidam, H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71,
4840–4844. (b) Marshall, J. A. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3163–3186.
(12) (a) Williams, D. R.; Brooks, D. A.; Berliner, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 4924–4925. (b) Phillips, A. J.; Uto, Y.; Wipf, P.; Reno, M. J.;
Williams, D. R. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1165–1168.
(13) (a) Tamura, R.; Kato, M.; Saegusa, K.; Kakihana, M.; Oda, D. J. Org.
Chem. 1987, 52, 4121–4124. (b) Tamura, R.; Saegusa, K.; Kakihana, M.;
Oda, D. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2723–2728.
(14) (a) Milstein, D.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 3636–3638.
For reviews, see: (b) Duncton, M. A. J.; Pattenden, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 1235–1246. (c) Pattenden, G.; Sinclair, D. J. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2002, 653, 261–268. (d) Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4442–4489.
Acknowledgment. Generous financial support by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (KA 913/14-1) and the Fonds der Che-
JA107290S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 39, 2010 13611