120
C. Waterman et al. / Phytochemistry 103 (2014) 114–122
larger batches, centrifugation was repeated in order to clear all
solid materials from the supernatant.
the gradient were 95% A and 5% B. The gradient progressed linearly
to 5% A and 95% B over 30 min and then remained isocratic for the
next 8 min. During the following 4 min, the ratio was brought to
initial conditions linearly. An 8 min equilibration interval was
included between subsequent injections. 1H NMR spectra were
recorded in MeOH-d4 on a 500 Varian VNMRS 500 MHz.
Extraction and isolation
Compounds 5 and 8 were extracted from fresh moringa leaves
using a modified approach to previously published methods
(Cheenpracha et al., 2010). Briefly, both were initially extracted
from ground leaves (200 g) in MeOH (400 mL) for 4 h at room
temperature.
The MeOH extract was evaporated to dryness under vacuum
and partitioned in H2O and hexanes (1:1 v/v) three times with
200 mL of each solvent. Equal volumes of EtOAc were then added
to the H2O fraction and partitioned. The EtOAc fraction was dried
down and resuspended in CH3CN–H2O (1:1), sonicated briefly,
Optimization and reproducibility of extraction
MC was prepared in ratios of 1:2, 1:5, and 1:10 (g of fresh
leaves: mL H2O) for optimization of ITC content and percent yield.
Triplicate samples of fresh moringa leaves (8 g) were ground in a
coffee grinder, diluted accordingly in H2O at room temperature,
and mixed for 30 min. For temperature experiments, fresh moringa
leaves (8 g) were ground in a coffee grinder and added to H2O
(40 mL) at 22, 40, 60, 80, and 100 °C as triplicate samples. The mix-
tures were maintained at these temperatures for 30 min in hot
water baths. Following 30 min of incubation, each MC was pre-
pared as described above. Analysis for percent yield (weight of
MC as a percent of starting fresh weight of leaves) and ITC content
was determined.
Once the optimum temperature (22 °C) and dilution factor (1:5)
were established using micro preparations, larger batches of MC
were made using the Vitamix blender (200 g: 1000 mL). Triplicate
samples of MC prepared in this manner from 3 separate batches of
moringa leaves were compared for reproducibility tests.
and filtered through a 0.45 lm filter prior to purification by pre-
parative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Replicate HPLC injections of an aliquot of the EtOAc fraction
(100
lL, 200 mg/mL) were eluted with CH3CN-H2O-TFA
(50:50:0.05) to yield 5 (Rt = 8.2 min) and 8 (Rt = 17.5 min). The elu-
ent of HPLC solvent at these Rt was collected and dried initially by
rotary-evaporation, followed by lyophilization. The compounds ap-
peared as white solids. Compound 8 was scraped and placed on a
petri dish for imaging at 10X magnification (Fig 4 insert). The
chemical purity of isolated ITCs was confirmed by liquid chroma-
tography mass spectrometry (LCMS) and 1H NMR spectroscopic
analyses. Reversed phase HPLC was carried out on a Waters System
consisting of a four channel Waters 616 pump with semi-prepara-
tive pump heads operated by a Waters 600 Controller; Waters
490E Programmable Multiwavelength Detector set to monitor at
222 nm; and Waters 717 Plus Autosampler. Compounds were sep-
arated on a Phenomenex semi-preparative Synergi Hydro column
Compound stability
Triplicate samples (100 mg) of optimized MC were placed at
room temperature (ca.25 °C) and in a 37 °C dark incubator and
subjected to LCMS analysis for quantification of ITCs at 0, 20 and
30 days for room temperature experiments and 0, 18 and 30 days
for 37 °C experiments.
(4
l
M, 250 ꢁ 20 mm, 80 Å) with a mobile phase flow rate of
10 mL/min.
Compound quantification
Characterization of extract
UV peak area of LCMS injections of 5 and 8 (>98% purity) at 3
concentrations (3x) were averaged and used to generate standard
curves to quantify ITC content in MC preparations. 1 lL injections
The optimized MC preparation, prepared at 22 °C H2O using a
ratio 1:5 (w/v) of fresh leaves to H2O was additionally character-
ized for TP content and ORAC. TP content was quantified by the Fo-
lin–Ciocalteu method (Singleton and Rossi, 1965) and sample
absorbance was read at 726 nm against a gallic acid standard
(3ꢁ) of 5 at 20, 100, and 200 ng/
lL dissolved in CH3CN-H2O (1:1)
generated a standard curve (y = 123xꢀ0.098, R2 = 1), and 8 at 10,
50, and 100 ng/lL generated a standard curve (y = 104.32xꢀ
curve. ORAC was determined as lM TE using fluorescein as the
0.098, R2 > 0.99). The content of compounds 6 and 7 were esti-
mated by using the standard curve of 8, but was not included when
total ITC content was calculated.
fluorescent probe and 2,2’-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochlo-
ride (AAPH) as a peroxyl radical generator in a procedure adapted
from previously published methods (Prior et al., 2003).
LCMS analysis was performed using the DionexÒ UltiMate 3000
RSLC ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography system, consisting
of a workstation with DionexÒ Chromeleon v. 6.8 software pack-
age, solvent rack/degasser SRD-3400, pulseless chromatography
pump HPG-3400RS, autosampler WPS-3000RS, column compart-
ment TCC-3000RS, and photodiode array detector DAD-3000RS.
After the photodiode array detector, the eluent flow was guided
to a Varian 1200L (Varian Inc., Palo Alto, CA) triple quadrupole
mass detector with electrospray ionization interface, operating in
the negative ionization mode. The voltage was adjusted to
ꢀ4.5 kV, heated capillary temperature is 280 °C, and sheath gas
(zero grade compressed air) for the negative ionization mode.
The mass detector was used in scanning mode from 65 to 1500
atomic mass units. Data from the Varian 1200L mass detector
was collected, compiled and analyzed using Varian’s MS Worksta-
tion, v. 6.9, SP2. Compounds were separated on a Phenomenex™
Cell culture
All reagents were supplied from Sigma–Aldrich Co. (St. Louis,
MO) unless otherwise noted. RAW 264.7 macrophages (ATCC TIB-
71) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
(DMEM) (Caisson, North Logan, UT) supplemented with 100 U/mL
penicillin, 100 lg/mL streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum.
Cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere
and subcultured by cell scraping. For experiments, RAW cells were
plated at a density of 4 ꢁ 105 cells/mL in 24-well plates. Cells were
incubated overnight (18 h), washed with warm PBS, and replaced
with fresh DMEM media. Cells were pretreated with designated
doses of MC, 5, 8 or vehicle (EtOH–H2O, 1:1, v/v). LPS (1 lg/mL)
was added after 2 h incubation with treatments to elicit inflamma-
tory responses. Cells were treated in duplicate or triplicate. After an
additional 6 h incubation period, media were collected and then
cells were washed with PBS prior to collection in TRIzolÒ Reagent
(Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Samples were stored at ꢀ80 °C
prior to processing.
C8 reversed phase column, size 150 ꢁ 2 mm, particle size 3
lm,
pore size 100 Å. The mobile phase consisted of 2 components:
Solvent A (0.5% ACS grade AcOH in double distilled de-ionized
H2O, pH 3–3.5), and Solvent B (CH3CN). The initial conditions of