than to the cyclohexyl- or n-butyl-substituted double bond.13
Syn addition of A across the hydroxymethyl-substituted carbon–
carbon double bond occurs from the less-hindered side (d-side)
and b-elimination of Rh(I)–OH immediately follows to give (E)-5.
Table 1 Rh(I)-catalysed addition of aryl- and alkenylboronic acids 2 to
1aa
Entry
2
R
3
Yield/%b
Z/Ec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
m-Tol
3ab
3ac
3ad
3ae
3af
3ag
3ah
3ai
68
77
68
76
68
71
73
61
71
52
68
>95 : 5
>95 : 5
95 : 5
>95 : 5
92 : 8
>95 : 5
>95 : 5
93 : 7d
94 : 6d
89 : 11
90 : 10
p-Tol
(2)
Ph
o-MeO–C6H4
p-MeO–C6H4
p-Br–C6H4
p-MeO2C–C6H4
2-thienyl
3-thienyl
b-styryl
9
10
11
2j
3aj
2k
2l
3ak
3al
In summary, we have developed a rhodium-catalysed addition
reaction of arylboronic acids to allenic alcohols, allowing the
stereoselective formation of vinyl-substituted (Z)-stilbenes. This
catalytic process presents a rare example of d-elimination of Rh(I)–
OH.
(E)-hexenyl
a Reactions conducted on a 0.2 mmol scale. b Isolated yield. c Determined
by 1H NMR. d In the absence of B(OH)3.
Table 2 Rh(I)-catalysed addition of o-tolylboronic acid (2a) to a-allenols
1a
Acknowledgements
Yield/%b Z/Ec
This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research on Priority Areas “Chemistry of Concerto Catalysis”
No. 20037032 form MEXT, Japan.
Entry
1
1
3
46
62
>95 : 5d
Notes and references
‡ Typical procedure: An oven-dried flask was charged with 2a (27.1 mg,
0.20 mmol), B(OH)3 (123.6 mg, 2.0 mmol) and a solution of 1a (29.4 mg,
0.20 mmol) in MeOH (2.0 mL). Then, [Rh(OH)(cod)]2 (2.3 mg, 5.0 mmol)
was added and the flask was flushed with argon. After stirring at room
temperature for 3 h, the reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (10
mL) and passed through a pad of basic silica gel (Fuji Silysia Chemical
Ltd., NH-DM1020). The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure
and the residue was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography
(hexane–ethyl acetate 50 : 1) to give the product 3aa as a colorless oil
(31.6 mg, 0.14 mmol, 71%, Z/E = 98 : 2).
2
91 : 9d
3
4
1d Ar = p-Cl–C6H4
1e Ar = p-MeO–C6H4 3ea
3da
68
61
>95 : 5
86 : 14
1 For reviews, see: (a) K. Fagnou and M. Lautens, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
169; (b) T. Hayashi and K. Yamasaki, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 2829; (c) T.
Miura and M. Murakami, Chem. Commun., 2007, 217; (d) S. W. Youn,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 2597.
2 (a) T. Hayashi, M. Takahashi, Y. Takaya and M. Ogasawara, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5052; (b) P. Zhao, C. D. Incarvito and J. F.
Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 1876.
a The reaction conditions were the same as those in Table 1. b Isolated yield.
c Determined by 1H NMR. d Using 2.5 equiv. of PhB(OH)2 for 24 h.
The use of other allenic alcohols 1 was also examined in
the rhodium-catalysed addition reaction of 2a (Table 2). Trisub-
stituted allenic alcohol 1b reacted to produce 3ba with high
stereoselectivity, albeit in low yield (Z/E = >95 : 5, entry 1).
Dimethyl-substituted substrate 1c was also converted to the
product 3ca in 62% yield (Z/E = 91 : 9, entry 2). Both chloro
and methoxy substituents were tolerated on the aryl substituent
of 1 (entries 3 and 4). The chloro-substituted allenic alcohol 1d
exhibited a higher stereoselectivity than the methoxy-substituted
allenic alcohol 1e.
For comparison, the reaction was carried out using alkyl-
substituted allenic alcohols 4. Much to our surprise, (E)-isomers 5
having the opposite stereochemistry were predominantly formed
(eqn (2)). The inversion of the stereochemistry is explained by
assuming that o-tolylrhodium(I) species A prefers addition to
the hydroxymethyl-substituted carbon–carbon double bond rather
3 (a) M. Lautens, C. Dockendorff, K. Fagnou and A. Malicki, Org.
Lett., 2002, 4, 1311; (b) L. Navarre, S. Darses and J.-P. Geneˆt, Chem.
Commun., 2004, 1108; (c) L. Dong, Y.-J. Xu, L.-F. Cun, X. Cui, A.-Q.
Mi, Y.-Z. Jiang and L.-Z. Gong, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 4285; (d) B. P.
Machin, M. Ballantine, J. Mandel, N. Blanchard and W. Tam, J. Org.
Chem., 2009, 74, 7261.
4 (a) M. Murakami and H. Igawa, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2002, 85, 4182; (b) T.
Miura, M. Shimada and M. Murakami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
1094; (c) T. Miura, T. Sasaki, H. Nakazawa and M. Murakami, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 1390; (d) T. Miura, T. Sasaki, T. Harumashi and
M. Murakami, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 2516; (e) T. Miura, M.
Shimada, S. Ku, T. Tamai and M. Murakami, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2007, 46, 7101.
5 T. Miura, Y. Takahashi and M. Murakami, Chem. Commun., 2007,
595.
6 For other synthetic methods of vinyl-substituted (Z)-stilbenes, see:
(a) K. K. Wang, C. Liu, Y. G. Gu, F. N. Burnett and P. D. Sattsangi,
J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 1914; (b) N. Chinkov, S. Majumdar and I.
Marek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 13258; (c) L. Shao and M. Shi,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2005, 3, 1828.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4074–4076 | 4075
©