Organometallics 2010, 29, 6117–6120 6117
DOI: 10.1021/om100660w
Synthesis and Properties of [Cp2Ti(Me)(H2O)][B(C6F5)4]
ꢀ
Alexandre F. Dunlop-Briere and Michael C. Baird*
Department of Chemistry, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
Received July 7, 2010
Summary: Treatment of water-stable Cp2TiMe2 with [Ph3C]-
[B(C6F5)4] (R = CH2CHMe2, CH2CMeCH2Et), prepared
by methyl carbanion abstraction from Cp2ZrMe2 by [Ph3C]-
[B(C6F5)4] in CD2Cl2 to give inter alia the solvent-separated
ion pair [Cp2Zr(Me)(CD2Cl2)][B(C6F5)4], followed by sub-
stitution of CD2Cl2 by the alkene.3a,b Such alkene complexes
are of interest for several reasons: (a) they are alkyl alkene
complexes of a type intermediate in coordination polymer-
ization reactions but never previously observed because of
their high proclivities to migratory insertion, (b) they contain
a novel near η1 mode of alkene coordination, and (c) the
C(1)-C(2) π bonds are sufficiently weak that the dC(Me)R
groups rotate relative to the terminal dCH2 groups.3a,b
Embarking on a similar investigation of the analogous
titanium system, we have utilized the reaction of Cp2TiMe2
with [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] in CD2Cl2 to form mixtures of what
we believe to be the solvent-separated ion pair [Cp2Ti(Me)-
(CD2Cl2)][B(C6F5)4] (I), the contact ion pair [Cp2Ti(Me)-
B(C6F5)4] (II), and, when a deficiency of [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] is
used, the dinuclear species [Cp2Ti(Me)(μ-Me)Ti(Me)Cp2]-
[B(C6F5)4] (III).3c While III was readily identified on the basis
[B(C6F5)4] in CD2Cl2 gives the solvent-separated ion pair
[Cp2Ti(Me)(CD2Cl2)][B(C6F5)4], which reacts rapidly with
water at 205 K to give the corresponding aqua complex
[Cp2Ti(Me)(H2O)][B(C6F5)4]. The latter has been character-
ized by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy at 205 K and is a rare,
possibly unique, example of a complex containing aqua and
methyl ligands within the coordination sphere of a titanium(IV)
complex.
The orange compound Cp2TiMe2 exhibits properties sur-
prisingly different from those of its colorless heavy homo-
logues, Cp2ZrMe2 and Cp2HfMe2. For instance, while the
latter two compounds are thermally stable to at least 80 °C
and are readily manipulated at ambient temperature,1a,b
Cp2TiMe2 can be manipulated at ambient temperature but
is also found to decompose erratically and apparently auto-
catalytically at this temperature.1b,c-f Curiously, Cp2TiMe2
is most fragile when isolated as a solid, frequently turning
black during attempts at purification.1b,c-f It is thus best
stored as THF or toluene solutions, where dilution seems to
prevent autocatalytic decomposition processes that prob-
ably involve radical species.1g-i
Another significant difference between Cp2TiMe2, on one
hand, and Cp2ZrMe2 and Cp2HfMe2 on the other has to do
with their protolytic reactivities. Although Cp2ZrMe2 and
Cp2HfMe2 are very sensitive to water and alcohols, giving
methane and metal products containing oxo, hydroxyl, or
alkoxy ligands,2 the synthesis of Cp2TiMe2 involves meth-
ylation of Cp2TiCl2 with 2 equiv of methyl lithium followed
by hydrolysis, after which workup yields the orange pro-
duct.1b,c-i Thus Cp2TiMe2 is stable to water.
1
of its H NMR spectrum,3c such was not the case with the
two mononuclear species. Noting,3 however, that Cp chemi-
cal shifts in metallocene compounds are generally strongly
influenced by inductive effects,3d,4 we believed it reasonable
to assign the less shielded Cp resonance at δ 6.72 to the
cationic species I and the more shielded Cp resonance at
δ 6.33 to the neutral species II. Similar assignments had been
suggested for the analogous zirconium compounds [Cp2-
ZrMe(solvent)][B(C6F5)4] (solvent=CD2Cl2, C6D5Cl) and
Cp2ZrMeB(C6F5)4,3a,b and thus I was thought to contain a
(3) (a) Vatamanu, M.; Stojcevic, G.; Baird, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 454. (b) Sauriol, F.; Wong, E.; Leung, A. M. H.; Elliott Donaghue,
I.; Baird, M. C.; Wondimagegn, T.; Ziegler, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
We have recently reported the syntheses and properties of
the methyl alkene complexes [Cp2Zr(Me)(CH2dCMeR)]-
ꢀ
48, 3342. (c) Sauriol, F.; Sonnenberg, J. F.; Chadder, S. J.; Dunlop-Briere,
A. F.; Baird, M. C.; Budzelaar, P. H. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13357.
(d) Reviewers have expressed the opinion that the arguments for the
identification of I and II are not compelling, suggesting that one of them
might be Cp2TiMeCl,3d a potential product of degradation in the solvent,
CD2Cl2, or (unspecified) dinuclear species containing bridging anions. We
find, however, that the Cp and methyl resonances of Cp2TiMeCl are observed
at δ 6.23 and 0.65, respectively, and thus this compound is clearly not present
in our reaction mixtures. A reasonable dinuclear candidate might be
[Cp2TiMe]2(μ-O), but this compound would exhibit Cp and Me resonances
at δ 5.82 and 0.52, respectively,3e-i and clearly is also not present. Other
unacceptable potential candidates are [Cp2TiCl]2(μ-O),3g for which the Cp
resonance would be observed at δ 6.30 albeit unaccompanied by a methyl
resonance, and Cp2TiMeOTiClCp2, for which the Cp resonances would be
observed at δ 5.98 and 6.14, the methyl resonance at δ 0.67.3g Thus all
suggested alternative identifications of I or II are not observed. Beachell,
H. C.; Butter, S. A. Inorg. Chem. 1965, 4, 1133. (e) Surer, H.; Claude, S.;
Jacot-Guillarmod, A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1978, 61, 2956. (f) Hughes, D. L.;
Payack, J. F.; Cai, D.; Verhoeven, T. R.; Reider, P. J. Organometallics 1996,
15, 663. (g) Huffman, M.; Payack, J. PCT Int. Appl. WO 2000024748
A1 20000504, 2000. (h) Berget, P. E.; Schore, N. E. Organometallics 2006,
25, 552. (i) Berget, P. E.; Schore, N. E. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2398.
(4) Gray, D. R.; Brubaker, C. H. Inorg. Chem. 1971, 10, 2143.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: bairdmc@chem.queensu.ca.
(1) (a) Samuel, E.; Rausch, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6263.
(b) Alt, H. G.; Di Sanzo, F. P.; Rausch, M. D.; Uden, P. C. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1976, 107, 257. (c) Clauss, K.; Bestian, H. Justus Liebigs Ann.
Chem. 1962, 654, 8. (d) Erskine, G. J.; Wilson, D. A.; McCowan, J. D.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1976, 114, 119. (e) Erskine, G. J.; Hartgerink, J.;
Weinberg, E. L.; McCowan, J. D. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 170, 51. (f)
Razuvaev, G. A.; Mar'in, V. P.; Andrianov, Y. A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979,
174, 67. (g) Razuvaev, G. A.; Mar'in, V. P.; Drushkov, O. N.; Vyshinskaya,
L. I. J. Organomet. Chem. 1982, 231, 125. (h) Li, H.; Neckers, D. C. Can. J.
Chem. 2003, 81, 758. (i) Dollinger, L. M.; Ndakala, A. J.; Hashemzadeh, M.;
Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Martinez, I.; Arcari, J. T.; Galluzzo, D. J.; Howell, A. R.;
Rheingold, A. L.; Figuero, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7074. (j) Payack,
J. F.; Hughes, D. L.; Cai, D.; Cottrell, I. F.; Verhoeven, T. R. Organic
Syntheses; Collect. 2004; Vol. 10, p 355.
(2) (a) Wailes, P. C.; Weigold, H.; Bell, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1972,
34, 155. (b) Fronczek, F. R.; Baker, E. C.; Sharp, P. R.; Raymond, K. N.; Alt,
H. G.; Rausch, M. D. Inorg. Chem. 1976, 15, 2284, and references therein.
(c) Yakelis, N. A.; Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3579, and
references therein.
r
2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/15/2010
pubs.acs.org/Organometallics