Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 817–822 817
DOI:10.1021/cm102077j
Solution-Processable Star-Shaped Molecules with Triphenylamine Core
and Dicyanovinyl Endgroups for Organic Solar Cells†
Jing Zhang,‡,§ Dan Deng,‡,§ Chang He,*,‡ Youjun He,‡ Maojie Zhang,‡,§ Zhi-Guo Zhang,‡
Zhanjun Zhang,§ and Yongfang Li*,‡
‡Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100190, China, and Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
§
Received July 26, 2010. Revised Manuscript Received October 12, 2010
Two new star-shaped D-π-A molecules with triphenylamine (TPA) as core and donor unit,
dicyanovinyl (DCN) as end group and acceptor unit, and 4,40-dihexyl-2,20-bithiophene (bT) or 4,
40-dihexyl-2,20-bithiophene vinylene (bTV) as π bridge, S(TPA-bT-DCN) and S(TPA-bTV-DCN),
were synthesized for the application as donor materials in solution-processed bulk-heterojunction
organic solar cells (OSCs). The two compounds are soluble in common organic solvents, because of
the three-dimensional structure of the TPA unit and the two hexyl side chains on the bithiophene unit.
S(TPA-bTV-DCN) film shows a broad absorption band from 360 to 750 nm. Absorption edge of
S(TPA-bTV-DCN) film is red-shifted by ca. 78 nm than that of S(TPA-bT-DCN) film, benefitted
from the vinylene bridges between TPA and bithiophene units in S(TPA-bTV-DCN). Power
conversion efficiency (PCE) of the solution-processed bulk-heterojunction OSC based on a blend
of S(TPA-bTV-DCN) and [6,6]-phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester (1:2, w/w) reached 3.0% with a
short circuit current density of 7.76 mA/cm2 and an open circuit voltage of 0.88 V, under the
illumination of AM.1.5, 100 mW/cm2. In comparison, PCE of the OSC based on S(TPA-bT-DCN) as
donor is 1.4% under the same experimental conditions. The PCE of 3.0% for S(TPA-bTV-DCN) is
among the top values for the solution-processed molecule-based OSCs reported so far.
1. Introduction
and capability to fabricate flexible devices. For the donor
materials in OSCs, solution-processable conjugated organic
molecules have drawn much attention in recent years2-16
because of the advantages of high purity and definite
molecular weight of the organic small molecules in compar-
ison with the lower purity and molecular weight distribution
of the polymers. Among the soluble organic photovoltaic
molecules, the donor-π conjugated bridge-acceptor
(D-π-A) structured organic compounds have attracted
considerable research interests for their broad absorption in
visible region resulted from the intramolecular charge trans-
fer (ICT) and for their lower HOMO levels tuned by the
acceptor units.6,8-16 For example, Nguyen et al.10 synthe-
sized a D-A organic molecule containing benzofunan-
thiophene as donor unit and diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP)
Bulk heterojunction organic solar cells (OSCs)1 are
composed of a photoactive blend layer of a conjugated
polymer or organic molecule donor and a soluble fullerene
derivative acceptor sandwiched between an indium-tin
oxide (ITO) positive electrode and a low workfunction metal
negative electrode. In comparison with the traditional solar
cells based on inorganic semiconductors, the OSCs possess
the advantages of easy fabrication, low cost, light weight,
† Accepted as part of the “Special Issue on π-Functional Materials”.
*Corresponding author. E-mail: hechang@iccas.ac.cn (C.H.); liyf@iccas.
ac.cn (Y.L.). Fax: 86-10-62559373.
(1) Yu, G.; Gao, J.; Hummelen, J. C.; Wudl, F.; Heeger, A. J. Science
1995, 270, 1789–1791.
(2) Roquet, S.; Cravino, A.; Leriche, P.; Aleveque, O.; Frere, P.;
Roncali, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3459–3466.
(3) Roncali, J.; Leriche, P.; Cravino, A. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 2045–
2060.
(4) Roncali, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1719–1730.
(5) (a) Ma, C.-Q.; Mena-Osteritz, E.; Debaerdemaeker, T.; Wienk,
M. M.; Janssen, R. N. J.; Bauerle, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 1679–1683. (b) Ma, C.-Q.; Fonrodona, M.; Schikora, M. C.;
Wienk, M. M.; Janssen, R. A. J.; Bauerle, P. Adv. Funct. Mater.
2008, 18, 3323–3331.
(6) Sun, M. L.; Wang, L.; Zhu, X. H.; Du, B.; Liu, R.; Yang, W.; Cao,
Y. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2007, 91, 1681–1687.
(7) Sun, X.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Tian, W.; Yu, G.; Qiu, W.;
Chen, S.; Zhu, D. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110, 7702–7707.
(8) Xue, L. L.; He, J. T.; Gu, X.; Yang, Z. F.; Xu, B.; Tian, W. J. J.
Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 12911–12917.
(9) (a) Tamayo, A. B.; Walker, B.; Nguyen, T. Q. J. Phys. Chem. C
2008, 112, 11545–11551.(b) Tamayo, A. B.; Dang, X. D.; Walker,
B.; Seo, J.; Kent, T.; Nguyen, T. Q. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, Art.
No. 103301.
(10) Walker, B.; Tomayo, A. B.; Dang, X. D.; Zalar, P.; Seo, J. H.;
Garcia, A.; Tantiwiwat, M.; Nguyen, T. Q. Adv. Funct. Mater.
2009, 19, 3063–3069.
(11) He, C.; He, Q. G.; Yang, X. D.; Wu, G. L.; Yang, C. H.; Bai, F. L.;
Shuai, Z. G.; Wang, L. X.; Li, Y. F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111,
8661–8666.
(12) He, C.; He, Q. G.; Yi, Y. P.; Wu, G. L.; Bai, F. L.; Shuai, Z. G.; Li,
Y. F. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4085–4090.
(13) Zhao, G. J.; Wu, G. L.; He, C.; Bai, F. Q.; Xi, H. X.; Zhang, H. X.;
Li, Y. F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 2636–2642.
(14) Wu, G. L.; Zhao, G. J.; He, C.; Zhang, J.; He, Q. G.; Chen, X. M.;
Li, Y. F. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 108–113.
(15) Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; He, C.; He, Y. J.; Zhao, G. J.; Li, Y. F.
Macromolecules 2009, 42, 7619–7622.
(16) Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, G. J.; He, C.; Li, Y. F.;
Andersson, M.; Inganas, O.; Zhang, F. L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010,
114, 3701–3706.
r
2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/26/2010
pubs.acs.org/cm