of carbon-carbon bonds.5 Our particular attention is cur-
rently focused on a special type of geminal bissilyl com-
pounds6 such as 3,3-bissilyl carbonyl and enol derivatives 5
and 6. Despite potentially being attractive synthons, they have
been barely investigated due to the lack of suitable synthetic
methods. We envisioned that a direct and practical entry into
these species might be achieved via the retro-[1,4] Brook
rearrangement of 3-silyl allyloxysilanes 1 (Scheme 1).
Herein, we report the realization of this methodology.
HMPA as cosolvent was also not effective and led to less
than 40% conversion. Delightfully, when s-BuLi was used
instead of t-BuLi, 1a was consumed completely in several
seconds at -78 °C and converted into a new compound after
quenching with 10% aq HCl (Scheme 2). To our surprise,
Scheme 2a
Scheme 1
a a. LDA (1.5 equiv), THF, -78 °C to rt. b. t-BuLi (1.5 equiv), HMPA
(5.0 equiv)/THF, -78 °C. c. s-BuLi (1.5 equiv), HMPA (5.0 equiv)/THF,
-78 °C then 10% aq HCl. d. further hydrolysis during concentration and
chromatography.
this initial formed product appears to be quite stable with
the acidic hydrolysis condition even for several hours, but it
can be converted slowly into the desired aldehyde 5a during
concentration and chromatography on silica gel. Since the
compound has been ruled out to be either retro-[1,2] Brook
rearrangement or 1,3-hydrogen shift products, we presumed
it might be the hydrate 7 generated by hydrolysis of the
lithium enolate intermediate 4.
Given the observed good acid stability of 7, we predicted
basic hydrolysis would be feasible to generate the desired
aldehydes. As expected, quenching the reaction with 10 equiv
of H2O followed by stirring at room temperature for 3 h gave
rise to the aldehyde 5a in 62% yield (Table 1, entry 1). It is
In accordance with Mitchell’s observation, the initial use
of LDA as base proved to be unworkable for the rearrange-
ment of 1a possessing the sterically hindered triethylsilyl
groups. Tomooka’s protocol using t-BuLi with 5.0 equiv of
(2) For studies on the retro-[1,4] Brook rearrangement, see: (a) Evans,
D. A.; Takacs, I. M.; Hurst, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 371. (b)
Rucker, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 4349. (c) Mora, J.; Costa, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 3493. (d) Lautens, M.; Delanghe, P. H. M.;
Goh, J. B.; Zhang, C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3270. (e) Marumoto, S.;
Kuwajima, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9021. (f) Jiang, X. L.; Bailey,
W. F. Organometallics 1995, 14, 5704. (g) Braun, M.; Mahler, H. Liebigs
Ann. 1995, 29. (h) Bures, E.; Spinazze, P. G.; Beese, G.; Hunt, I. R.; Rogers,
C.; Keay, B. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 8741. (i) Bousbaa, J.; Ooms, F.;
Krief, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7625. (j) Gibson, C.; Buck, T.; Walker,
M.; Bru¨eckner, R. Synlett 1998, 201. (k) Kleinfeld, S. H.; Wegelius, E.;
Hoppe, D. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 2413. (l) Comanita, B. M.; Woo,
S.; Fallis, A. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5283. (m) Simpkins, S. M. E.;
Kariuki, B. M.; Arico, C. S.; Cox, L. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3971. (n) Nahm,
M. R.; Xin, L. H.; Potnick, J. R.; Yates, C. M.; White, P. S.; Johnson, J. S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2377. (o) Yamago, S.; Fujita, K.; Miyoshi,
M.; Kotani, M.; Yoshida, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 909. (p) Mori, H.; Matsuo,
T.; Yoshioka, Y.; Katsumura, S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9004. (q) Mori,
Y.; Futamura, Y.; Horisaki, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1091.
(3) (a) Mitchell, T. N.; Schu¨tze, M.; Giebelmann, F. Synlett 1997, 187.
(b) Mitchell, T. N.; Schu¨tze, M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 1285.
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions
entry
HMPA
workup
tempa time yieldb
1
2
3
4
5.0 equiv
1.2 equiv H2O (10 equiv)
0.3 equiv
1.2 equiv
H2O (10 equiv)
rt
rt
rt
50°C
3 h
3 h
3 h
1 h
62%
91%
N.D.
30%
(4) Nakazaki, A.; Nakai, T.; Tomooka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 2235.
(5) For reviews, see: (a) Marek, I.; Normant, J. F. Chem. ReV. 1996,
96, 3241. (b) Marshall, J. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 31. (c) Marek, I. Chem.
ReV. 2000, 100, 2887. (c) For recent advances, see: Shimizu, M.; Kitagawa,
H.; Kurahashi, T.; Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4283. (d)
Hirashita, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Mitsui, K.; Araki, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
3467, and references therein.
H2O (10 equiv)
H2O (10 equiv)
LiOH (3 equiv)/H2O
(20 equiv)
5
1.2 equiv
rt
2 h
75%
a Temperature of the basic hydrolysis step. b Isolated yields after
(6) For studies on geminal bissilyl species, see: (a) Fleming, I.; Floyd,
C. D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 969. (b) Ahlbrecht, H.; Farnung,
W.; Simon, H. Chem. Ber. 1984, 117, 2622. (c) Brook, A. G.; Chrusciel,
J. J. Organometallics 1984, 3, 1317. (d) Klumpp, G. W.; Mierop, A. J. C.;
Vrielink, J. J.; Brugman, A.; Schakel, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107,
6740. (e) Lautens, M.; Ben, R. N.; Delanghe, P. H. M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1994, 33, 2448. (f) Lautens, M.; Delanghe, P. H. M.; Goh, J. B.; Zhang,
C. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4213. (g) Lautens, M.; Ben, R. N.; Delanghe,
P. H. M. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7221. (h) Princet, B.; Anselme, G.; Pornet,
J. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 3326. (i) Princet, B.; Gariglio, H. G.; Pornet,
J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 604, 186. (j) Hodgson, D. M.; Barker, S. F.;
Mace, L. H.; Moran, J. R. Chem. Commun. 2001, 153. (k) Onyeozili, E. N.;
Maleczka, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 6565. (l) Williams, D. R.;
purification by silica gel column chromatography.
noteworthy that despite that Tomooka has emphasized the
importance of a large excess of HMPA for the high
selectivity of retro-[1,4] Brook rearrangement in simple
allyloxysilane systems4 here 1.2 equiv appeared to be
effective enough to facilitate the silyl migration, providing
an even much higher 91% yield (entry 2). However, using a
catalytic amount of HMPA only resulted in the partial retro-
´
Morales-Ramos, A. I.; Williams, C. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4393.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010
5299