Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Strained Cyclooctyne Phosphoramidite
reported.13-15 While most of these methods have their merits,
they are not generally applicable due to limitations such as
lack of selectivity and incomplete reactions.
The nucleic acid fragments, resulting from this approach,
are provided with dibenzocyclooctynol function at the 5′ end,
allowing cycloaddition with azides to give oligonucleotide
conjugates having intact primary and secondary structure.
Phosphoramidite 5 was designed as a suitable and easily
accessible phosphitylating reagent.
The advent of the Cu(I)-catalyzed16,17 Huisgen [3 + 2]
cycloaddition between an alkyne and an azide, commonly
referred to as the “click” reaction, enables the selective
formation of a specific triazole product in an aqueous and
otherwise complex chemical environment. In recent years,
DNA fragments have been conjugated to oligopeptides,
oligosaccharides, and fluorescent dyes in this fashion. In a
postsynthetic approach, oligonucleotides functionalized with
either an alkyne or an azide are conjugated with comple-
mentary functionalized molecules after standard automated
DNA synthesis and ensuing removal of the protecting
groups.18 In this approach, alkyne or azide functionalities
are appended to nucleobases, the ribose, or the terminal
phosphate of the synthetic DNA fragments.19 Alkyne func-
tions are more often incorporated in DNA fragments, as
azides are usually incompatible with the phosphoramidite
chemistry applied in the solid-phase synthesis of oligonucle-
otides. The necessity to use a Cu(I)-stabilizing ligand20 and
oxygen-free conditions to increase the cycloaddition rate and
to minimize the degradation of DNA has shifted the attention
to the development of Cu-free click reactions. This aim
corresponds with the new metal-free bioorthogonal reactions
developed in the field of chemical biology and involves the
reaction of strained cycloalkynes with azides,21-23 the
reaction of strained alkenes with tetrazines,24a,b the reaction
of oxabornadienes with alkynes,25 and a strategy based on a
photoreaction-mediated liberation of a strained alkyne for
ensuing click ligation.26 Recent methodologies to nucleic acid
conjugates apply the nitrile oxide-norbornene27 click chem-
istry and the Diels-Alder reaction.28a,b As part of a pro-
gram29 to design and evaluate nucleic acid conjugates, we
became interested in the bioconjugation procedure of the
group of Boons,23 in which 4-dibenzocyclooctynols are
applied for the visualization of metabolically labeled gly-
coconjugates. Dibenzocyclooctynols are easily synthesized
and react rapidly with azides. We envisaged that derivati-
zation of dibenzocyclooctynol and ensuing conversion into
a phosphoroamidite would afford a phosphitylation agent
applicable for automated solid-phase nucleic acid synthesis.
Previously described cyclooctynol 130 (Scheme 1) was
treated with p-nitrophenyl chloroformate. The resulting
carbonate 2 was used without further purification to react
with 2 equiv of TBDPS-protected aminohexanol,31 furnishing
3 in near quantitative yield. TBAF-mediated removal of the
TBDPS group of 3 and subsequent phosphitylation of the
(9) Yan, H.; Tram, K. Glycoconjugate J. 2007, 24, 107–123
(10) Nakagawa, O.; Ming, X.; Huang, L.; Juliano, R. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2010, 132, 8848–8849
(11) Lo¨nnberg, H. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009, 20, 1065–1094
(12) Juliano, R.; Alam, R.; Dixit, V.; Kang, H. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008,
36, 4158–4178
(13) Lu, K.; Duan, Q-. P.; Ma, L.; Zhao, D-. X. Bioconjugate Chem.
2010, 21, 187–202
.
.
.
.
.
(14) Singh, Y.; Murat, P.; Defrancq, E. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2010, 39, 2054–
2070
.
(15) Singh, Y.; Spinelli, N.; Defrancq, E. Curr. Org. Chem. 2008, 12,
263–290
(16) Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 3057–3064
(17) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599
.
.
.
(18) Gramlich, P. M. E.; Wirges, C. T.; Manetto, A.; Carell, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8350–8358.
(19) Finn, M. G.; Fokin, V. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2010, 39, 1388–1405.
(20) Chan, T. R.; Hilgraf, R.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 2853–2855.
(21) Agard, N. J.; Prescher, J. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 15046–15047
(22) Jewett, J. C.; Sletten, E. M.; Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 3688–3690
(23) Ning, X.; Guo, J.; Wolfert, M. A.; Boons, G-.J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2253–2255
.
.
.
(24) (a) Blackman, M. L.; Royzen, M.; Fox, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 13518–13519. (b) Devaraj, N. K.; Weissleder, R.; Hilderbrand,
S. A. Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 2297
.
(25) van Berkel, S. S.; Dirks, A. J.; Meeuwissen, S. A.; Pingen, D. L. L.;
Boerman, O. C.; Laverman, P.; van Delft, F. L.; Cornelissen, J. J. L. M.;
Rutjes, F. P. J. T. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1805–1815.
(26) Song, W.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Lin, Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
9654–9655.
(27) Gutsmiedl, K.; Wirges, C. T.; Ehmke, V.; Carell, T. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 2405–2408.
(28) (a) Schoch, J.; Wiessler, M.; Jaschke, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 8846–8847. (b) Marchan, V.; Ortega, S.; Pulido, D.; Pedroso, E.;
Grandas, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, e24.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010
5487