However, to the best of our knowledge, the transition-metal-
catalyzed reaction of diazirines has not been reported. Since
diazirine can be converted into a diazo compound or carbene
upon photolysis or thermolysis (eq 1),7 we conceived that
diazirine might replace N-tosylhydrazone in a Pd-catalyzed
cross-coupling reaction. Herein we report the Pd(0)-catalyzed
cross-coupling of diazirines with aryl halides, which affords
substituted olefins in good yields.
Table 1. Reaction Condition Optimization with Pd-Catalyzed
Cross-Coupling of 1a and 2a
entry
cat. (mol %)
t (°C) solvent yield (%)a
1b c
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd(PPh3)4 (5)
90
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
110
110
110
DCE
MeCN
MeCN
THF
CHCl3
NMP
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
DCE
32
27
33
11
,
2b
3b
4b
5b
6b
7b
8e
9e
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Pd2(dba)3(2.5)/Xphos (10)
Xphos (10)
d
–
–
At the outset of this investigation, we explored the Pd-
catalyzed cross-coupling of 3-methyl-3-phenyldiazirine 1a with
p-bromotoluene 2a under oil bath heating conditions. To our
delight, cross-coupling product could indeed be formed, albeit
in low yield, by heating at 90 °C for 4 h (Table 1, entry 1).
The yield could not be further improved regardless of extensive
optimization attempts.8 We observed that the main side product
was styrene, which was derived from diazirine decomposition
through a carbene 1,2-hydrogen shift.4,9 Further optimization
experiments revealed that microwave irradiation could
slightly improve the yield with Pd(PPh3)4 as catalyst (entry
2).10 Switching the catalyst to Pd2(dba)3/Xphos (2-dicyclo-
hexylphosphino-2′,4′,6′-triisopropylbiphenyl) further im-
proved the reaction (entry 3). Since microwave-assisted
reactions are generally affected by solvents, we next at-
tempted to optimize the reaction by examining a series of
solvents, including 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), N-methyl-2-
pyrrolidinone (NMP), THF, and CHCl3 (entries 4-7). DCE
d
37
40
64
78
10e f
11
,
g
–
a Isolated yields. b 1a:2a ) 1.1:1; concentration of 1a is 0.17 mol/L.
c Reaction was heated by an oil bath for 4 h. d Product 3a was not detected.
e Concentration of 1a is 1.0 mol/L. f 1a:2a ) 1.5:1. g 2a remained unchanged
while 1a decomposed to afford a complex mixture.
afforded better results compared with MeCN (entry 7), while
other solvents all gave inferior results (entries 4-6).
Subsequent experiments indicated that higher concentration
and higher reaction temperature could improve the reaction
(entries 8 and 9). Finally, the reaction was found to afford
optimal results by further changing the substrate ratio of 1a
to 2a from 1.1:1 to 1.5:1 (entry 10).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the substrate
scope was examined with a series of diazirines 1a-g and halides
2a-n (Table 2). All the reactions were complete within 10 min
and afforded substituted olefins in moderate to excellent yields.
For the aromatic bromides, the reactions demonstrated high
functional group tolerance. The reaction proceeded smoothly
with ortho-, meta-, and para-substituted aryl bromides (entries
1, 12, and 20). Both electron-donating and -withdrawing groups
of the aryl bromides were tolerated (entries 2-6). Heterocyclic
aryl bromides could be employed in the coupling reaction (entry
7). Highly sterically hindered mesityl bromide (2j) could also
afford the coupling products 3m and 3p in good yields (entries
13 and 18).
(3) For a review, see: Fulton, J. R.; Aggarwal, V. K.; de Vicente, J.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1479.
(4) For reviews, see: (a) Moss, R. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 267,
and references therein. (b) Liu, M. T. H., Ed. Chemistry of Diazirines; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1987.
(5) For selected recent reports, see: (a) Mayer, T.; Maier, M. E. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 4711. (b) Kumar, N. S.; Young, R; N. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2009, 17, 5388. (c) Chee, G.; Yalowich, J. C.; Bodner, A.; Wu, X.;
Hasinoff, B. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 830. (d) Hashimoto, M.;
Furukawa, K.; Tomohiro, T.; Hatanaka, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010, 58,
405.
(6) (a) Albini, A.; Kisch, H. In Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer
Berlin/Heidelberg Press, 1976; Vol. 65, p 5. (b) Chaloner, P. A.; Gary, D.;
Glick, G. D.; Moss, R. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1983, 880. (c)
Avent, A. G.; Benyunes, S. A.; Chaloner, P. A.; Hitchcock, P. B. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1285. (d) Benyunes, S. A.; Chaloner, P. A. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1988, 341, C50. (e) Benyunes, S. A.; Chaloner, P. A.;
Hitchcock, P. B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1491. (f) Avent,
A. G.; Benyunes, S. A.; Chaloner, P. A.; Gotts, N. G.; Hitchcock, P. B.
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1991, 1417. (g) Moss, R. A.; Fede´, J.; Yan,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9878.
Tri- and tetrasubstituted olefins were obtained in good yields
by using the diazirines bearing alkyl substituents other than a
methyl group (entries 16-23). The stereoselectivity of the olefin
products varied depending on the substrates. It was noted that
the reaction of diazirines with ortho-substituted aryl bromides
could afford trisubstituted olefins with high stereoselectivity,
(7) For selected literature, see: (a) Amrich, M. J.; Bell, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 292. (b) Liu, M. T. H.; Ramakrishnan, K. J. Org.
Chem. 1977, 42, 3450. (c) Ammann, J. R.; Subramanian, R.; Sheridan, R. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7592. (d) Nigam, M.; Platz, M. S.; Showalter,
B. M.; Toscano, J. P.; Johnson, R.; Abbot, S. C.; Kirchhof, M. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8055. (e) Reinaldo, M.; Frances, L. C. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 881. (f) Zhang, Y.; Burdzinski, G.; Kubicki, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16134. (g) Zhang, Y.; Vyas, S.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz,
M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 5902.
(11) Typical procedure for the Pd(0)-catalyzed cross-coupling. Aryl halide
(0.6 mmol), diazirine (0.9 mmol), triethylamine (0.9 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (0.015
mmol, 2.5 mol %), XPhos (0.06 mmol, 10 mol %), and dioxane (0.6 mL)
were mixed in a microwave tube. The mixture was stirred at 110 °C for 10
min under microwave conditions (the highest power: 200 W; run time: 2 min;
hold time: 10 min; temperature: 110 °C). Upon the completion of the reaction,
the solution was filtered through a short silica gel column. The solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure, and the crude residue was purified by flash
chromatography on silica gel.
(8) For details, see Supporting Information.
(9) (a) Schaefer, H. F., III Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 288. (b) Nikon,
A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 84
.
(10) For recent reviews on microwave-assisted reactions, see: (a) Kappe,
C. O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6250. (b) Appukkuttan, P.; Van der
Eycken, E. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 1133 and references cited
therein.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010
5581