DFT calculations on compound 1 and its H+ and F-
adducts at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory provide insight
into the nature of fluorescence in each of these emissive
states. Calculations indicate that the donor and acceptor
chromophores make the largest contributions to the HOMO
and LUMO, respectively, consistent with through-space p(N)
r p(B) charge transfer as the lowest-energy emission
pathway. However, once the p orbital on boron is blocked
using fluoride, the lowest energy transition of [1·F]- becomes
a charge transfer from the (F)BMes2-phenyl (HOMO) to the
naphthyl (LUMO), producing blue fluorescence. If instead
the filled p orbital on nitrogen is blocked using acid, the
lowest energy transition of [1·H]+ is from the BMes2phenyl-
naph (HOMO) to the phenyl-naph (LUMO), producing
purple fluorescence with some charge transfer character. The
trend of the emission energy observed for these species
agrees with that of the calculated HOMO-LUMO gap
shown in Figure 3.
Figure 2. Normalized fluorescent emission spectra of 1 and its acid
and fluoride adducts. Inset: Photographs of the corresponding
solutions at 10-5 M in CH2Cl2, λex ) 365 nm.
the dialkylamine as well as the close donor-acceptor spacing
imposed by the naphthyl linker.
When tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) is added to
a solution of 1, the emission color is observed to rapidly
switch from green to sky blue with similar quantum
efficiency (λmax ) 469 nm, Φ ) 0.42). This is accompanied
by an increase in intensity of the strong 333 nm band in the
UV-visible spectrum of 1, likely due to a reduction in the
CT contributions of this transition and increase in π-π*
character, improving the overall overlap between participat-
ing MOs. Approximately 20 equiv of fluoride are required
to achieve complete color switching, a higher level than in
the case of most organoboranes but comparable to similar
sterically congested materials reported previously,4,6 corre-
sponding to a binding constant K of (1.7 ( 0.5) × 104 M-1.
1H and 19F NMR titrations of 1 with TBAF indicate the
quantitative conversion of 1 to [1·F]- without intermediates.
While the selectivity of dimesitylboranes for fluoride ions
over Cl-, Br-, and others is well documented, these
compounds are well-known to be responsive to cyanide ions
as well.7 Titration with tetraethylammonium cyanide (TEACN)
in CH2Cl2 thus triggers a similar fluorescent spectral change
to that induced by F- (λmax ) 466 nm, K ) (1.6 ( 0.5) ×
104 M-1). As the response to both anions is similar, further
detailed studies will focus on fluoride as a trigger for
fluorescent change here.
Figure 3.
HOMO-LUMO diagrams of 1, [1·F]-, and [1·H]+.
Remarkably, the fluorescent responses to both acid and
fluoride in this system are fully reversible by applying the
opposite trigger. Despite possessing receptor sites for both
ions, the compound exists instead as free 1 when treated with
both stimuli, and the green fluorescence is preserved.
Similarly, after treatment of 1 with excess acid or fluoride,
the CT emission can be restored by titration with the other
trigger (Figure 4b and 4d). No sample degradation is
observed in either case, and these processes can be cycled
several times in either direction without loss of fluorescent
intensity. These results are in constrast with previous studies,
in which it was shown that protonation of a proximal tertiary
amine could promote hydrolysis of an adjacent triarylborane.9
The removal of fluoride ions from triarylboranes using protic
acids including water has been reported previously.10
1H and 19F NMR titrations of [1·F]- with acid or [1·H]+
with fluoride provide insight into these processes. While
Conversely, addition of a strong acid (HBF4 or HBArF )
4
to a CH2Cl2 solution of 1 results in quantitative protonation
after addition of ∼1.5 equiv of acid, switching the emission
color of the sample to bright purple (λmax ) 398 nm). This
is accompanied by a large increase in the quantum yield of
the sample (Φ ) ∼1.0), which is consistent with other
triarylboron compounds conjugated to highly electron-rich
π-systems.6,8 As with [1·F]-, NMR data indicate clean
formation of [1·H]+ on addition of acid.
(6) Zhao, S.-B.; Wucher, P.; Hudson, Z. M.; McCormick, T. M.; Liu,
X.-Y.; Wang, S.; Feng, X.-D.; Lu, Z.-H. Organometallics 2008, 27, 6446
.
(9) Broomsgrove, A. E. J.; Addy, D. A.; Di Paolo, A.; Morgan, I. R.;
Bresner, C.; Chislett, V.; Fallis, I. A.; Thompson, A. L.; Vidovic, D.;
Aldridge, S. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 157.
(7) (a) Wade, C. R.; Gabba¨ı, F. P. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 49, 714. (b) Chiu,
C.-W.; Gabbaï, F. P. Dalton Trans. 2008, 814. (c) Hudnall, T. W.; Gabbaï,
F. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11978. (d) Broomsgrove, A. E. J.; Addy,
D. A.; Bresner, C.; Fallis, I. A.; Thompson, A. L.; Aldridge, S. Chem.sEur.
J. 2008, 14, 7525.
(10) (a) Sun, Y.; Ross, N.; Zhao, S.-B.; Huszarik, K.; Jia, W.-L.; Wang,
R.-Y.; Macartney, D.; Wang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7510. (b)
Yamaguchi, S.; Akiyama, S.; Tamao, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
11372.
(8) Wang, N.; Hudson, Z. M.; Wang, S. Organometallics 2010, 29, 4007
.
302
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011